Author Topic: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2  (Read 5768 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5736
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #150: July 15, 2017, 10:31:18 PM »
Yunel Escobar could pitch better than this

Soriano's son could pitch better.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #151: July 15, 2017, 10:31:30 PM »
This tryout crap is wearin' me out.



it's the pitching coach

Online KV

  • Posts: 1786
  • Believe!
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #152: July 15, 2017, 10:33:14 PM »
If we traded for Iglesias right now could he come in and pitch for us?😀

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #153: July 15, 2017, 10:34:00 PM »
If we traded for Iglesias right now could he come in and pitch for us?😀

Who would we pinch hit for?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63103
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #154: July 15, 2017, 10:34:06 PM »


Rivero was not garbage here. He's elevated his game but to say he was garbage is bullcrap. And of course you'd scapegoat the pitching coach. :smh:

3.67 ERA his time here. 4.53 in 2016 before he was traded. He was awful. Magically he goes to Pittsburg and he's elite? That's called excellent coaching.

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5736
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #155: July 15, 2017, 10:34:15 PM »
But the Nats have an 8 man pen!

Just don't tell anyone that only three guys can get outs.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29499
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #156: July 15, 2017, 10:34:24 PM »

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #157: July 15, 2017, 10:34:38 PM »
3.67 ERA his time here. 4.53 in 2016 before he was traded. He was awful. Magically he goes to Pittsburg and he's elite? That's called excellent coaching.

I don't think he's in Pittsburg.      :couch:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #158: July 15, 2017, 10:34:55 PM »
a HR here makes this a save situation.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #159: July 15, 2017, 10:35:24 PM »
3.67 ERA his time here. 4.53 in 2016 before he was traded. He was awful. Magically he goes to Pittsburg and he's elite? That's called excellent coaching.



you really are a freaking idiot

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29499
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #160: July 15, 2017, 10:35:28 PM »
3.67 ERA his time here. 4.53 in 2016 before he was traded. He was awful. Magically he goes to Pittsburg and he's elite? That's called excellent coaching.

Right now I'd take some BP arms with a 4.53 ERA...

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #161: July 15, 2017, 10:35:55 PM »
And yunz thought I was BS'ing.

Online varoadking

  • Posts: 29499
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #162: July 15, 2017, 10:35:56 PM »
a HR here makes this a save situation.

 :shock:

Offline Mattionals

  • Posts: 5736
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #163: July 15, 2017, 10:36:11 PM »
3.67 ERA his time here. 4.53 in 2016 before he was traded. He was awful. Magically he goes to Pittsburg and he's elite? That's called excellent coaching.

He has a .182 BABIP this year and a .310 with the Nats last year. ERA is a bogus stat and you know it.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63103
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #164: July 15, 2017, 10:36:11 PM »
I don't think he's in Pittsburg.      :couch:

They can have the "h" back when they get to .500

Online KV

  • Posts: 1786
  • Believe!
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #165: July 15, 2017, 10:36:13 PM »
Unfreakingbelievable

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #166: July 15, 2017, 10:36:24 PM »
This bullpen
         :smh:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #167: July 15, 2017, 10:36:40 PM »
Do we feel a little bad for him? He looked like a deer in the headlights.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #168: July 15, 2017, 10:36:45 PM »
Explain his delivery now Uncle Ray.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #169: July 15, 2017, 10:37:06 PM »
Do we feel a little bad for him? He looked like a deer in the headlights.

He's been up before  ...  ya get one.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63103
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #170: July 15, 2017, 10:37:07 PM »
He has a .182 BABIP this year and a .310 with the Nats last year. ERA is a bogus stat and you know it.

Literally none of his metrics stats are better in DC than in Pitt. They made him a better pitcher, like they have a bunch before.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 63103
  • THE SUMMONER OF THE REVERSE JINX
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #171: July 15, 2017, 10:37:32 PM »
Right now I'd take some BP arms with a 4.53 ERA...

I know, right

Offline stealyerbase

  • Posts: 5398
  • YUMMY! Good for you too!
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #172: July 15, 2017, 10:38:23 PM »
Guess they wanted to give Grace a clean inning....

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #173: July 15, 2017, 10:38:43 PM »
Right now I'd take some BP arms with a 4.53 ERA...

Here they come.

Offline trangert418

  • Posts: 3609
  • Quit Clowning Around
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #174: July 15, 2017, 10:39:03 PM »
Not 100% sure but don't think this is a save situation.....yet....Ah....just looked it up and I am wrong