Author Topic: Nationals vs Cubs, Game 1  (Read 12192 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19431
  • Believe!!!
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #125: June 26, 2017, 08:57:22 PM »
Cmon offense, Gio's more than doing his part.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #126: June 26, 2017, 09:01:00 PM »
He's already a god, HoF is window dressing.



:clap:


Seriously good numbers over a 16 year career.  Was he ever connected to PED's?




I don't think so but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he used.

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 29564
  • King of Goodness
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #127: June 26, 2017, 09:01:31 PM »

So who comes in for the 7th...

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #128: June 26, 2017, 09:03:34 PM »
I love me some baseball-reference.com.     Here's his numbers:

Similar Batters

Miguel Cabrera (933.6)
Jeff Bagwell (860.4) *
Larry Walker (860.2)
Jim Rice (849.5) *
Willie Stargell (840.8) *
Billy Williams (840.4) *
Todd Helton (835.8)
Duke Snider (822.7) *
Andres Galarraga (819.2)
Carlos Delgado (817.3)
* - Signifies Hall of Famer

Most Similar by Ages

23. Yasiel Puig (952.4)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
24. Manny Ramirez (945.7)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
25. Willie Mays (937.9) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
26. Willie Mays (938.4) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
27. Willie Mays (942.9) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
28. Manny Ramirez (937.8)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
29. Willie Mays (928.1) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
30. Manny Ramirez (920.8)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
31. Manny Ramirez (914.5)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
32. Duke Snider (900.4) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
33. Duke Snider (880.0) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
34. Duke Snider (878.0) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
35. Gary Sheffield (866.9)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
36. Rafael Palmeiro (888.8)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
* - Signifies Hall of Famer
Vladimir Guerrero's name doesn't appear on this list at all, are there are no headings to indicate what any of these numbers mean.


Offline Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 25972
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #129: June 26, 2017, 09:05:19 PM »
Good luck Bryce with the Yanks or Cubbies or Dodgers.

Offline NatsAllThe Way

  • Posts: 14508
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #130: June 26, 2017, 09:06:05 PM »
Why can't we ever have relievers like this?

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #131: June 26, 2017, 09:07:12 PM »
Vladimir Guerrero's name doesn't appear on this list at all, are there are no headings to indicate what any of these numbers mean.

(Image removed from quote.)

Go with the tao and embrace all the numbers.    You will understand.    It's the company you keep.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #132: June 26, 2017, 09:07:45 PM »
I love me some baseball-reference.com.     Here's his numbers:

Similar Batters

Miguel Cabrera (933.6)
Jeff Bagwell (860.4) *
Larry Walker (860.2)
Jim Rice (849.5) *
Willie Stargell (840.8) *
Billy Williams (840.4) *
Todd Helton (835.8)
Duke Snider (822.7) *
Andres Galarraga (819.2)
Carlos Delgado (817.3)
* - Signifies Hall of Famer

Most Similar by Ages

23. Yasiel Puig (952.4)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
24. Manny Ramirez (945.7)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
25. Willie Mays (937.9) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
26. Willie Mays (938.4) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
27. Willie Mays (942.9) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
28. Manny Ramirez (937.8)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
29. Willie Mays (928.1) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
30. Manny Ramirez (920.8)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
31. Manny Ramirez (914.5)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
32. Duke Snider (900.4) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
33. Duke Snider (880.0) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
34. Duke Snider (878.0) *  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
35. Gary Sheffield (866.9)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
36. Rafael Palmeiro (888.8)  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10
* - Signifies Hall of Famer



Some very impressive players to be compared to.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19431
  • Believe!!!
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #133: June 26, 2017, 09:09:17 PM »
Vladimir Guerrero's name doesn't appear on this list at all, are there are no headings to indicate what any of these numbers mean.

(Image removed from quote.)

I thought the same but didn't want to look stupid asking :lol:

Offline NatsAllThe Way

  • Posts: 14508
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #134: June 26, 2017, 09:09:32 PM »
All the Nats needed to do there was lay off the curve ball.  On that note, game.  Treinen will give up an easy 4 spot.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #135: June 26, 2017, 09:10:31 PM »


Some very impressive players to be compared to.

You get it.    :)     When I see Willie Mays, Duke Snider, Stargell, Williams, etc., you're pretty damned good.

Offline ghostface

  • Posts: 1465
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #136: June 26, 2017, 09:10:45 PM »
this game sucks

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11912
  • lol Nats

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #138: June 26, 2017, 09:12:51 PM »
Treinen's gettin' a lot of work.

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19431
  • Believe!!!
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #139: June 26, 2017, 09:12:57 PM »


I'd love to see your posts if they actually were bad.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #140: June 26, 2017, 09:12:59 PM »
You get it.    :)     When I see Willie Mays, Duke Snider, Stargell, Williams, etc., you're pretty damned good.


There are a few others on that list that put up eye popping numbers. Guerrero was a stud.




Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11912
  • lol Nats
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #141: June 26, 2017, 09:13:20 PM »
Demote him for that alone.

Offline NatsAllThe Way

  • Posts: 14508
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #142: June 26, 2017, 09:14:28 PM »
Awful, inexcusable.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #143: June 26, 2017, 09:14:36 PM »
Get some.

Offline nfotiu

  • Posts: 5045
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #144: June 26, 2017, 09:15:00 PM »
This is a fun article.  As an expos fan, I remember a lot of these stories. 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2686595-vladimir-guerrero-the-2500-signing-with-mismatched-shoes-and-clemente-tools

I have seen him hit more than one bounced pitches to the outfield for doubles.  Always wished he got one out of the park.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #145: June 26, 2017, 09:15:14 PM »
I thought the same but didn't want to look stupid asking :lol:

No reason to worry about looking stupid, when you're the only one in the room who isn't stoned.

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11912
  • lol Nats
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #146: June 26, 2017, 09:15:45 PM »
I'd love to see your posts if they actually were bad.


Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #147: June 26, 2017, 09:15:59 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
No reason to worry about looking stupid, when you're the only one in the room who isn't stoned.


'scuse me while the kiss the sky.


Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 19431
  • Believe!!!
Re: Nationals vs the Stoopid Cubbies, Game 1
« Reply #148: June 26, 2017, 09:16:19 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
No reason to worry about looking stupid, when you're the only one in the room who isn't stoned.


:lmao: