Author Topic: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2  (Read 5751 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67840
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #250: September 17, 2016, 04:24:40 PM »
Getting on base is normally the objective for a hitter

That wasn't aimed at your post. It was aimed at the moron who is doing the game and said that it wasn't like Rendon was trying to tag the runner but that the runner basically fell onto the tag. That doesn't matter. he was still out.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 54802
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #251: September 17, 2016, 04:34:16 PM »
Werth had a long day  ...  pfffffffffffffffffffffffft

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 42545
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #252: September 17, 2016, 04:35:45 PM »
Werth had a long day  ...  pfffffffffffffffffffffffft

FP?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 25583
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #253: September 17, 2016, 11:20:39 PM »
Getting on base is normally the objective for a hitter

Some people still struggle with the basics of baseball. :shrug:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67840
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 2
« Reply #254: September 17, 2016, 11:43:52 PM »
Some people still struggle with the basics of baseball. :shrug:

Read my response you freaking moron. My post had nothing to do with what Slate posted. I was talking about what the commentator was saying.