As a mathematics major, I find it pretty hilarious when people try to argue with numbers. Numbers don't have opinions. As the article points out, different assumptions can change the computations but other assumptions noted actually priced WAR even higher so FG's estimate of $6 million may have even been a bit low. Unless you believe you have some mathematical insight into a better method of calculating WAR values, which I would be happy to discuss with you since I'm looking for a research project, I think arguing with numbers just makes you seem unintelligent with all due respect.