Author Topic: Washington Redskins thread (2016)  (Read 35620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 44311
  • thanosdidnothingwrong
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #25: January 15, 2016, 08:29:37 PM »
The player you want to get is the player you said this draft is weak in- number 1 receivers with jackson's speed don't slip, especially in a weak draft
You mean like a 5'10" receiver with blazing speed?

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19459
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #26: January 15, 2016, 08:40:35 PM »
You mean like a 5'10" receiver with blazing speed?

Jackson became dominant, so clearly you can grab elite receivers whenever you want, by your logic may as well cut cousins because Brady like talent can be had in the sixth.

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 4109

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19459
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #28: January 19, 2016, 03:48:14 PM »
Quote
“If I could go back, I wouldn’t,” he said of playing football. “I would play baseball. I got drafted by the Cubs in the 14th round [of the 1997 MLB Draft], but I didn’t play baseball because of my parents. They made me go to school. Don’t get me wrong, I love the game of football. But right now, I could still be playing baseball.

umm maybe indy league

Offline imref

  • Posts: 26395
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #29: February 16, 2016, 04:59:17 PM »
The Redskins and Cousins have reportedly broken off contract talks so a franchise tag seems likely.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 56944
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #30: February 16, 2016, 05:13:55 PM »
The Redskins and Cousins have reportedly broken off contract talks so a franchise tag seems likely.

106.7 is reporting that there are multiple reports   ....  some say broken off and another report is they're still talking but far apart.   It's early.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 44311
  • thanosdidnothingwrong
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #31: February 16, 2016, 05:19:37 PM »
OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 56944
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #32: February 16, 2016, 05:26:20 PM »
OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Exactly    :hysterical:

Offline Optics

  • Posts: 9200
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #33: February 16, 2016, 05:40:06 PM »
Negotiation 101.

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11802
  • lol Nats
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #34: February 16, 2016, 06:35:57 PM »
Franchise tag, he'll probably be good next year, he'll want even more money for proving it again. We could probably get him at a discount long-term but I guess that's not happening now.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 44311
  • thanosdidnothingwrong
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #35: February 16, 2016, 09:27:28 PM »
Meh, honestly, no freaks given. Let him negotiate. I think that it was telling that Cousins didn't really come on strong until Jackson came back healthy. Cousins strikes me as a QB that really needs solid weapons around him to be a good QB. He isn't going to make a receiver.

Online Natsinpwc

  • Posts: 11960
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #36: February 26, 2016, 02:44:58 PM »
Funny stuff, from CSN;

"The Redskins drafted linebacker H.B. Blades in 2007. He played for Washington until being cut at the end of training camp in 2011. Now, the team in suing Blades in federal court, according to TMZ.

In the filing, the Redskins claim they paid Blades a $40,000 severance when he was released, but "mistakenly paid an additional $40,000 to Blades on December 27, 2013 as a result of a clerical error."

The team notified their former linebacker of the error, but he would not return the money.

Blades has not been reached for comment."


Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 19041
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #37: February 26, 2016, 03:35:26 PM »
1. Jackson didn't come back healthy. He came back.
2. What QB will be able to do much of anything without at least one deep threat?

Meh, honestly, no freaks given. Let him negotiate. I think that it was telling that Cousins didn't really come on strong until Jackson came back healthy. Cousins strikes me as a QB that really needs solid weapons around him to be a good QB. He isn't going to make a receiver.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 44311
  • thanosdidnothingwrong
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #38: February 26, 2016, 05:23:13 PM »
1. Jackson didn't come back healthy. He came back.
2. What QB will be able to do much of anything without at least one deep threat?


1. Jackson was healthy
2. Very few.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 44311
  • thanosdidnothingwrong
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #39: March 01, 2016, 02:38:37 PM »
Cousins was franchised

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11802
  • lol Nats
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #40: March 09, 2016, 01:05:08 PM »
I like the move to re-sign Foster.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19459

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 44311
  • thanosdidnothingwrong
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #42: March 14, 2016, 03:21:17 PM »
Yea, a moat all around the stadium won't possibly be a problem for all the people who started drinking at 8am.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19459
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #43: March 14, 2016, 03:24:15 PM »
Yea, a moat all around the stadium won't possibly be a problem for all the people who started drinking at 8am.

at least you won't have to worry about lines at the bathroom

Offline imref

  • Posts: 26395
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #44: March 14, 2016, 03:59:15 PM »
at least you won't have to worry about lines at the bathroom

Win

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 14653
  • babble on
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #45: March 14, 2016, 09:29:00 PM »
The people in that rendering are a lot more fit than the lawn chair & 30-pack crowd

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 44311
  • thanosdidnothingwrong
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #46: March 15, 2016, 10:08:30 PM »
Junior coming back

Offline mmzznnxx

  • Posts: 11802
  • lol Nats
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #47: March 17, 2016, 03:19:55 AM »
Redskins re-signed Josh LeRibeus. To which we all ask, "why?"

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3920
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins thread (2016)
« Reply #48: April 07, 2016, 08:01:07 PM »
Redskins re-signed Josh LeRibeus. To which we all ask, "why?"
Cheap depth.