Am I the only one who doesn't see a problem with the ten vote rule? Was there any slam dunk candidate who didn't get in (aside from the steroid guys which is a different argument)? You can say Piazza, but that's a steroid argument as much as anything else. I think Schilling and Mussina are getting screwed, but I think there are a lot of voters who just don't think they belong.
Trammell is being hurt by the 10 vote rule, as is Mussina and Raines. There is practically 0 chance that Trammell will pick up the extra 50% he needs to get in, and he is quite comparable to guys who are in like Larkin and guys who are "first ballot locks" like Jeter. Trammell is also hurt by cutting down the eligibility period from 15 to 10 years.
Delgado not being carried forward is ridiculous. 10 straight years of 30+ homers and no suggestions of PEDs? Off in one ballot? Even if you feel that Jim Rice and Andre Dawson should be out rather than in, they were certainly close enough that they deserved the multiple years of scrutiny they got. Delgado is not going to get that.
Of course, there are debatable candidates like Larry Walker, who I think should be in but others do not. But the 10 vote rule simply has not kept up with the number of eligibles due to expansion, and the combination of the 10 vote rule and the 5% cut off / 75% election threshold, plus the blank and short ballots, results in a backlog and under representation of the free agency era in the HOF.