Author Topic: Bernie doing big things  (Read 2016 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 4042
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #25: January 22, 2013, 06:31:43 PM »
MLB needs to get him to piss in a cup.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22904
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #26: January 22, 2013, 08:55:26 PM »
Gotta draw blood to get the Synthetic T

Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 5489
  • Team America 2014
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #27: January 23, 2013, 12:46:38 PM »

Offline DC_Nats

  • Posts: 121
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #28: January 23, 2013, 02:58:13 PM »
My first thought exactly.

Riiiiiight! Because that is the only way someone could possibly gain lean muscle mass.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12573
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #29: January 23, 2013, 03:27:39 PM »
Pretty sure Dibble used to call him Roger "The Body" Bernadina.

He's always this pumped up before Spring training.

My first thought exactly.

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4044
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #30: January 23, 2013, 04:17:52 PM »
Riiiiiight! Because that is the only way someone could possibly gain lean muscle mass.

"Lean muscle mass."     :lmao:

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4044
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #31: January 23, 2013, 04:20:42 PM »
He's always this pumped up before Spring training.

Exactly.

So was Schwarzenegger, Canseco, McGwire, Bonds, etc. etc. etc.

So what is your point . . . ?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22904
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #32: January 23, 2013, 05:17:37 PM »
Riiiiiight! Because that is the only way someone could possibly gain lean muscle mass.

There is nothing lean about arms that big

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12573
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #33: January 23, 2013, 06:08:38 PM »
That if it he were pumped up because of PEDs, it would have been discovered by now? That this picture, for anyone that has paid attention, isn't a surprise, but a yearly reprise? That the guys that you have to suspect of using PEDs are the guys that have no history of being ripped?


Exactly.

So was Schwarzenegger, Canseco, McGwire, Bonds, etc. etc. etc.

So what is your point . . . ?


Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12573
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #34: January 23, 2013, 06:12:19 PM »
Well, it's lean versus fat.
There is nothing lean about arms that big

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22904
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #35: January 23, 2013, 07:10:14 PM »
Well, it's lean versus fat.

Michael Phelps is lean. Shark is not. Shark is jacked.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14723
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #36: January 23, 2013, 07:21:47 PM »
That if it he were pumped up because of PEDs, it would have been discovered by now? That this picture, for anyone that has paid attention, isn't a surprise, but a yearly reprise? That the guys that you have to suspect of using PEDs are the guys that have no history of being ripped?



Mplba just agreed to test for hgh- high profile users be it bonds or Clemmons in baseball or Lance in cycling managed to never test positive

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27836
  • Hell yes!
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #37: January 23, 2013, 07:53:09 PM »
Michael Phelps is lean. Shark is not. Shark is jacked.

Lean muscle mass is lean muscle mass, regardless of the quantity.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12573
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #38: January 23, 2013, 08:25:31 PM »
Shark has more lean body mass (muscle) than Phelps does.
Michael Phelps is lean. Shark is not. Shark is jacked.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22904
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #39: January 23, 2013, 08:38:20 PM »
Yes. That's why his biceps are bigger than his head. Because he's so lean ...

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27836
  • Hell yes!
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #40: January 23, 2013, 09:00:47 PM »

Yes. That's why his biceps are bigger than his head. Because he's so lean ...

Nobody said he was lean, the quote you responded to was:

Riiiiiight! Because that is the only way someone could possibly gain lean muscle mass.


Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4044
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #41: January 24, 2013, 04:12:09 PM »
I am in agreement that there is a difference between “lean muscle mass” = little or no fat content and “lean” meaning an overall thin or skinny body.

But Bernie is neither.

He is pumped up beyond normal human proportions.
And if some people think that that comes strictly from the gym, whether it is the first time or over several years, well, what can I say.
Some people believe in the tooth fairy too, I guess.
:shrug:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22904
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #42: January 24, 2013, 05:52:53 PM »
That's not "lean muscle mass." That is muscle mass.

Lean muscle mass:


vs



Arms are twice as big. Thighs are huge too. It's a sprinter's body with an upper body to match.

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16123
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #43: January 25, 2013, 08:32:35 AM »
Sorry, I'm not convinced

I will need MANY MORE pictures of lean mass as proof

:thumbs:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22904
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #44: January 25, 2013, 08:44:14 PM »
Sorry, I'm not convinced

I will need MANY MORE pictures of lean mass as proof

:thumbs:





Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27836
  • Hell yes!
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #45: January 25, 2013, 09:01:13 PM »
 :shock:


 :lol:

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16123
  • No Trade Clause
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #46: January 25, 2013, 09:11:10 PM »
More More!!

:az:

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22904

Offline Dixon Ward

  • Posts: 1636
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #48: January 26, 2013, 09:53:14 AM »
That's not "lean muscle mass." That is muscle mass.

lean, in this context, is describing the fat content, not the amount of muscle fiber.


Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27836
  • Hell yes!
Re: Bernie doing big things
« Reply #49: January 26, 2013, 11:40:08 AM »
lean, in this context, is describing the fat content, not the amount of muscle fiber.

You're wasting your time, Slate is not noted for conceding anything, facts be damned.