Author Topic: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread  (Read 76184 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 17865
  • #freeclarkson
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3400: January 17, 2013, 08:46:38 PM »
Nats avoid arbitration with Drew Storen, 1/$2.5 million plus another $1 M in performance bonuses.

Does this mean he's a FA after this year?  I assume he's got a few more arbitration years left.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 25083
  • Home of the $400 blender
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3401: January 17, 2013, 08:51:40 PM »
Everyone here should either get laid or eat a bullet. Your choice.

I did both tonight!!!

When you say, "eat a bullet," should that go in the food and how you cook / eat it thread?

Deep fried hollowpoints for everyone!!!

No. I'm not going to use a Battlestar Galactica quote.
Oh your one of those One God believers. Check. NANF :lol:

Check with the Attorney General...he got pretty good walking things into Mejico that never came back...

 :rofl:  :clap: :lmao: :minigunz:

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3402: January 17, 2013, 09:11:30 PM »
Nats avoid arbitration with Drew Storen, 1/$2.5 million plus another $1 M in performance bonuses.

Does this mean he's a FA after this year?  I assume he's got a few more arbitration years left.

No, he's not a FA after the year.  I think he has 3 more years where he is arbitration-eligible.  Unless we agree to a long term deal with him, we'll go through the same thing again next year.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3403: January 17, 2013, 09:11:48 PM »
Nats avoid arbitration with Drew Storen, 1/$2.5 million plus another $1 M in performance bonuses.

Does this mean he's a FA after this year?  I assume he's got a few more arbitration years left.

should be 3 more years after 2013

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3404: January 17, 2013, 09:13:59 PM »
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/storedr01.shtml

This says he's eligible for free agency after the 2016 season.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3405: January 17, 2013, 09:17:37 PM »
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/storedr01.shtml

This says he's eligible for free agency after the 2016 season.


That's what you and I both said

Offline Mr Clean

  • Posts: 2220
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3406: January 17, 2013, 09:21:31 PM »
Does anyone know the deadline for arb eligibles?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37353
  • LAC 8)
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3407: January 17, 2013, 09:38:38 PM »
Check with the Attorney General...he got pretty good walking things into Mejico that never came back...

something something danny espinosa strikes out a lot.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 17865
  • #freeclarkson
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3408: January 17, 2013, 09:48:11 PM »
should be 3 more years after 2013

thanks - that makes sense, so i guess you can buy out one year of arbitration without impacting future years.  Nice pay day for Storen.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun


Offline imref

  • Posts: 17865
  • #freeclarkson
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3411: January 18, 2013, 12:02:56 AM »
And we almost had Cameron last year...

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 18488
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3412: January 18, 2013, 10:07:12 AM »
Check with the Attorney General...he got pretty good walking things into Mejico that never came back...
Oh, some of those things came back.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 18159
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3413: January 18, 2013, 12:25:59 PM »
Rizzo intereview on 106.7 The Fan today:
He expects the On Base Percentage (OBP) to be better in 2013, the fielding to be improved, and we now have more depth in the bullpen with Soriano. That sounds like Clippard and Storen will not be traded.  Rizzo said that all three of them are capable of closing games, but Soriano will be the closer.  Rizzo denied that Lerner demanded his acquisition, talking instead about how reliable Soriano has been. 

One of the reasons Rizzo stated for trading Morse was to give him a chance to play every day during his contract year.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/rafael-soriano-introduced-by-nationals-mike-rizzo-discusses-michael-morse-trade/2013/01/17/af54ef3a-6105-11e2-a389-ee565c81c565_story.html

Offline varoadking

  • Posts: 6715
  • King of Goodness
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3414: January 18, 2013, 12:49:50 PM »

Rizzo's no slave to fashion now, is he?

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 4797
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3415: January 18, 2013, 03:12:37 PM »
I can't believe that the guy we got for Joe Beimel is actually good.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18384
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3416: January 18, 2013, 03:15:06 PM »
Who did we get for him, again?

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 11510
  • Troll So Hard University
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3417: January 18, 2013, 03:22:16 PM »
Mattheus.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 6289
  • Sign all the Cubans
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3418: January 18, 2013, 03:49:41 PM »
Mattheus.

Can't forget Robinson Fabian

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18384
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3419: January 18, 2013, 04:10:21 PM »
Mattheus.
Oh, wow.  That worked out.

Offline NationalHeat

  • Posts: 465
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3420: January 18, 2013, 04:21:14 PM »
No one year deal yet with Zimm to avoid arb? Too optimistic to think they are working on a long term deal?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 25083
  • Home of the $400 blender
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3421: January 18, 2013, 04:58:17 PM »
No one year deal yet with Zimm to avoid arb? Too optimistic to think they are working on a long term deal?
Gotta be willing to spend some money. Who wants to risk it on the TJS test case?

Online blue911

  • Posts: 17050
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3422: January 18, 2013, 05:26:38 PM »
Thorburn has a nice write on Gio's mechanics on BP's website

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28306
  • Hell yes!
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3423: January 18, 2013, 05:42:33 PM »
Oh, wow.  That worked out.

Yeah, but we did lose that guy who was the Biemel fan who had that issue keeping track of his kids.

Offline madj55

  • Posts: 5041
  • The Hype.
Re: 2012/13 Offseason Discussion Thread
« Reply #3424: January 18, 2013, 05:46:28 PM »
I also remember the Julian Tavarez fan we had here