Author Topic: LCS Discussion Thread (2012)  (Read 4397 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Vega

  • Posts: 4581
LCS Discussion Thread (2012)
« Topic Start: October 13, 2012, 01:47:21 AM »
Derp a derp.

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3128
  • BM Punk
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #1: October 13, 2012, 02:53:47 AM »
Hope everyone loses.

Online Vega

  • Posts: 4581
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #2: October 13, 2012, 02:57:54 AM »
I have a bad case of Not Giving A freak Syndrome. (NGAFS.) All of the interesting teams are out. Us, Baltimore, Oakland, and Cinci were all fun teams that were different from the normal teams we see in the playoffs, but they're all gone. Who's left? Boring teams. None of the remaining teams are interesting in any way, and I don't give a freak which of them wins.

Offline BigMeech

  • Posts: 3128
  • BM Punk
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #3: October 13, 2012, 03:00:03 AM »
Same.  I mean, if I HAVE to root for a team It'll be the Giants but I just don't care anymore.  At least I'll be able to watch DEXTER on time on Sunday.

Online Vega

  • Posts: 4581
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #4: October 13, 2012, 03:03:19 AM »
Same.  I mean, if I HAVE to root for a team It'll be the Giants but I just don't care anymore.  At least I'll be able to watch DEXTER on time on Sunday.
I had the Giants making it to the Series in my preseason prediction, (I had them losing to Tampa, which obviously won't happen.) so it'd be cool if they got there, but I don't really care. I do like Hunter Pence though.

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4725
  • Natitude
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #5: October 13, 2012, 10:04:44 AM »
I have a bad case of Not Giving A freak Syndrome. (NGAFS.)

Got to agree. I don't give a crap who wins anymore, the only other teams I wanted to root for were the A's and the O's. Don't think I'll be watching many of the postseason games.

Offline OldChelsea

  • Posts: 5941
  • From the best seat in the house at Nationals Park
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #6: October 13, 2012, 10:43:01 AM »
Should be a pretty good NLCS - features the winners of the last two World Series.

And AM-980 is even carrying Yankees-Tigers game 1 tonight instead of an out-of-market college football match like this past Saturday! (No NLCS tomorrow though - Sundays it's Redskins, Redskins, Redskins on 980, especially with the 16.25 kick-off which means even a goodly chunk of Sunday Night Football will get pre-empted.)

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18213
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #7: October 13, 2012, 12:30:21 PM »
Yeah, as I mentioned in the other thread, I don't even know if I'll watch.  I probably will, but I'm not really feeling it right now.

Offline OldChelsea

  • Posts: 5941
  • From the best seat in the house at Nationals Park
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #8: October 13, 2012, 12:44:52 PM »
Yeah, as I mentioned in the other thread, I don't even know if I'll watch.  I probably will, but I'm not really feeling it right now.

I know the feeling - my interest in a league generally ends once the local side is done for the year...for instance, I generally don't follow the Stanley Cup playoffs once the Caps are done, or the NFL playoffs if the Redskins aren't in.

Right now DC United just need to get a point today to clinch their first playoff berth in five years, and Wizards season is 2 1/2 weeks away. Life goes on.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18213
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #9: October 13, 2012, 12:54:21 PM »
I normally watch the playoffs religiously and am excited for them, but after last night, I'm not there right now.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 11335
  • Troll So Hard University
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #10: October 13, 2012, 01:39:47 PM »
I want the Cards bounced.

Won't be watching, though.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14319
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #11: October 13, 2012, 02:05:40 PM »
I should be rooting for the Tigers to bring a title back to Mike the hitch Ilitch, as well as the crumbling city of Detroit, but I won't be able to get into it.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 6264
  • Sign all the Cubans
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #12: October 13, 2012, 02:30:13 PM »
I want the cards and yanks to get pounded into the ground.  I want to see pictures of Cardinals fans crying after the ruthless beating the Giants are about to give them.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #13: October 13, 2012, 05:00:51 PM »
ARod in the lineup tonight and batting 6th.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41010
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #14: October 13, 2012, 06:36:44 PM »
I want the Cardinals swept because they're holding a position that's undeserved.  They're supposed to be crying in their Busch beer, right now.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14319
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #15: October 13, 2012, 06:49:53 PM »
ARod in the lineup tonight and batting 6th.

I'm a poor excuse for a "Yankee fan" for not knowing this. 8)

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #16: October 13, 2012, 06:50:58 PM »
I'm a poor excuse for a "Yankee fan" for not knowing this. 8)

:lmao:  If you were a yankee fan.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #17: October 13, 2012, 06:51:23 PM »
I want the Cardinals swept because they're holding a position that's undeserved.  They're supposed to be crying in their Busch beer, right now.

They were better than their opponent so I don't see how they are not deserving.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14319
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #18: October 13, 2012, 06:52:33 PM »
:lmao:  If you were a yankee fan.

Hey, some people here think I'm a Yankee fan, and I'd hate to shatter their illusions.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41010
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #19: October 13, 2012, 07:28:33 PM »
They were better than their opponent so I don't see how they are not deserving.

When you're losing 6-0, particularly the way they won, a lot of things had to go right for them.  If one fewer thing goes right, a strike call in the 9th for example, and they lose, they're no longer the better team?

I will give you that they are the more fortunate team.  Literally, fortune favored them.

Online imref

  • Posts: 17566
  • Like my arm slot?
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #20: October 13, 2012, 07:31:00 PM »
it's going to be very very tough to watch the Yankees and Tigers tonight, but I'll remain content by the fact that I'm not watching the Orioles and Tigers.  Today would have been even more painful if Baltimore had moved on.

Online imref

  • Posts: 17566
  • Like my arm slot?
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #21: October 13, 2012, 07:31:25 PM »
I want the Cardinals swept because they're holding a position that's undeserved.  They're supposed to be crying in their Busch beer, right now.

beating us isn't deserving of a NLCS spot?

Online PC

  • Posts: 41010
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #22: October 13, 2012, 07:44:23 PM »
beating us isn't deserving of a NLCS spot?

I think the win was undeserved because of the entire series of events that had to happen for it to take place.

Offline zimm_da_kid

  • Posts: 6264
  • Sign all the Cubans
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #23: October 13, 2012, 07:47:35 PM »
They were better than their opponent so I don't see how they are not deserving.

5 games is not enough time to see who the better team is.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41010
Re: LCS Discussion Thread
« Reply #24: October 13, 2012, 08:25:00 PM »
The Yankees had the 3rd best record in baseball, John Smoltz.  :roll: