Author Topic: Division Series Discussion Thread  (Read 6650 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #275: October 10, 2012, 10:57:30 PM »
duke can't be topped for me.

especially during MD basketball's good years.  boy was it fun to play them.

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14320
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #276: October 10, 2012, 10:57:36 PM »
No Giambi and A-ROID and Pettite and Clemens did!

Funny how you ignored my bit about Orioles fans at RFK telling me they were no Nats fans.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33832
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #277: October 10, 2012, 10:58:23 PM »
duke can't be topped for me.

especially during MD basketball's good years.  boy was it fun to play them.

Fun!?!? You're playing 8-5 against them. It's sickening.

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14320
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #278: October 10, 2012, 10:58:48 PM »
I don't think I can explain my hatred of the Yankees. It rivals my hatred of Duke.

They used to be my top 2, now I barely care about them any more (I'm a fatalist with the NCAA, hating Duke has become beyond pointless to me).

Phillies + Penguins = SEETHERAGE

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86602
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #279: October 10, 2012, 10:59:08 PM »
I don't think I can explain my hatred of the Yankees. It rivals my hatred of Duke.
why

Who cares about the Yankees? They aren't even in the same league. There are probably 10 teams I hate more than them including the Orioles, Cardinals, Marlins, Braves, Phillies, Mets, Cubs, etc.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #280: October 10, 2012, 10:59:21 PM »
nats have a brighter future than o's.  i know i had a post at the start of 2011 season saying how i wish the nats could be like them - which was dead wrong - but yeah we're going to be better than the birds for many years.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #281: October 10, 2012, 10:59:34 PM »
No matter who wins the series, these have been great games.  Why can't our series be like that? :?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #282: October 10, 2012, 11:00:49 PM »
No matter who wins the series, these have been great games.  Why can't our series be like that? :?

i would've at least liked to have seen the nats crowd have a chance to get behind the team.  with the exception of the first two outs, there wasn't really anything to get going.

morse crap the bed, if he didn't, who knows maybe we're back in it.  but being down 4-0 in the 2nd inning ... that was terrible.

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14320
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #283: October 10, 2012, 11:01:04 PM »
nats have a brighter future than o's.  i know i had a post at the start of 2011 season saying how i wish the nats could be like them - which was dead wrong - but yeah we're going to be better than the birds for many years.

I want to agree with you, but I never would have expected the Orioles to be this good right now, so I'm not so sure any more.

No matter who wins the series, these have been great games.  Why can't our series be like that? :?

Ugh, too true.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #284: October 10, 2012, 11:01:28 PM »

And I'm sure Tejada and Palmeiro supplied the Yankees with a lot of their PEDs.  Baltimore and New York are fairly close.

No crap. Baltimore was one of the MLB spots where the juice was rampant. It seemed to be the east coast distribution point. The Bay area was the west coast post. Texas was the central spot. And Baltimore was the east coast clubhouse for PED traffic.


Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14320
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #285: October 10, 2012, 11:04:26 PM »
No crap. Baltimore was one of the MLB spots where the juice was rampant. It seemed to be the east coast distribution point. The Bay area was the west coast post. Texas was the central spot. And Baltimore was the east coast clubhouse for PED traffic.



Really?  That would make sense because Tejada came from Oakland (BALCO).  I was just freaking around with CALSGR8, but I love the hypocrisy of an O's fan, who likely cheered Tejada and Palmeiro, nagging about PEDs.

What makes you say Baltimore was a distribution point, as opposed to New York or some other city?  Is it Tejada, or something else?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #286: October 10, 2012, 11:04:36 PM »
Fun!?!? You're playing 8-5 against them. It's sickening.

:lmao:

Why can't our series be like that? :?

I'm really afraid to answer this question Chief.


Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33832
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #287: October 10, 2012, 11:05:06 PM »
Come on Thome. Do something big. My favorite Indian growing up.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #288: October 10, 2012, 11:05:28 PM »
I want to agree with you, but I never would have expected the Orioles to be this good right now, so I'm not so sure any more.

jones is a stud, machado will be good, matusz has to stay in bullpen ... but wieters is overrated, they don't have a 2B, their rotation (as good as it's been, is jumbled), etc.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33832
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #289: October 10, 2012, 11:06:03 PM »
Really?  That would make sense because Tejada came from Oakland (BALCO).  I was just freaking around with CALSGR8, but I love the hypocrisy of an O's fan, who likely cheered Tejada and Palmeiro, nagging about PEDs.

What makes you say Baltimore was a distribution point, as opposed to New York or some other city?  Is it Tejada, or something else?

Bigbie, Segui, etc. etc. all known juicers.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #290: October 10, 2012, 11:06:14 PM »
I'm really afraid to answer this question Chief.

???

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14320
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #291: October 10, 2012, 11:06:19 PM »
Come on Thome. Do something big. My favorite Indian growing up.

Ugh, I hate that I have to root against him.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #292: October 10, 2012, 11:06:58 PM »
Fun!?!? You're playing 8-5 against them. It's sickening.

haha true, but still good rivalry when MD is good.

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14320
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #293: October 10, 2012, 11:07:59 PM »
Bigbie, Segui, etc. etc. all known juicers.

Interesting - didn't know about them.

An O's/Nats (ahem Morse, Boone, LoDuca) fan complaining about the Yankees juicing is like Mao telling Stalin he's too violent. :lmao:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #294: October 10, 2012, 11:08:27 PM »
Really?  That would make sense because Tejada came from Oakland (BALCO).  I was just freaking around with CALSGR8, but I love the hypocrisy of an O's fan, who likely cheered Tejada and Palmeiro, nagging about PEDs.

What makes you say Baltimore was a distribution point, as opposed to New York or some other city?  Is it Tejada, or something else?

Don't forget that Palmeiro came from Texas which had tons of juicers with the likes of Juan Gonzalez (one of the main juicers of the time) and Pudge and the one and only Jose Canseco who came from the Bay area. I forget some of the other names in the birds' clubhouse but there were certainly others (Brady Anderson and David Segui).

Edit: Linty beat me to it. Lindy you're an jerk.  :lol:

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33832
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #295: October 10, 2012, 11:08:37 PM »
Scherzer is absolutely filthy.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #296: October 10, 2012, 11:10:24 PM »
???

I'm afraid to answer it because I may have to admit that they may just be the better team (I don't actually believe that though :lol:).

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14320
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #297: October 10, 2012, 11:10:33 PM »
Scherzer is absolutely filthy.

Wish I could watch, but I can't peel away from the game in NY.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #298: October 10, 2012, 11:10:40 PM »
Scherzer is absolutely filthy.

yeah he's pretty good at baseball

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Division Series Discussion Thread
« Reply #299: October 10, 2012, 11:10:55 PM »
:lmao: