Author Topic: (2012) Wild Card Round Discussion Thread  (Read 5484 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 53833
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #275: October 05, 2012, 08:37:16 PM »
:lmao:  @ Barves

Online ronnynat

  • Posts: 23223
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #276: October 05, 2012, 08:37:45 PM »
Congrats to the Cards. That ump ruined the game, though.

Online RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 17956
  • I'd like to buy a clutch hit, Pat
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #277: October 05, 2012, 08:39:00 PM »
They probably aren't showing the field on TV because there's so much trash on it

Offline Count Walewski

  • Posts: 835
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #278: October 05, 2012, 08:39:06 PM »
What a clusterfreak of a game.

Online monkeyhit

  • Posts: 1545
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #279: October 05, 2012, 08:39:30 PM »
It's why you have to win the division, with this one-game joke of a playoff.


Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15531
  • Future
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #281: October 05, 2012, 08:39:32 PM »
Larry stopped caring.

edit: on the run

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14726
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #282: October 05, 2012, 08:40:48 PM »
Congrats to the Cards. That ump ruined the game, though.

This is bartman,  Jeffery maier bad

Online CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11258
  • Be Loud * Be Proud * Be Positive
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #283: October 05, 2012, 08:41:01 PM »
Yeah.  As the junkies say "They are going to be cised" for this next game!

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13966
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #284: October 05, 2012, 08:42:09 PM »
Now it's time for me to reluctantly root for the Rangers

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 30008
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #285: October 05, 2012, 08:42:15 PM »
Congrats to the Cards. That ump ruined the game, though.

It's why you have to win the division, with this one-game joke of a playoff.

This is bartman,  Jeffery maier bad

Agreed with all of these.

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 30008
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #286: October 05, 2012, 08:42:35 PM »
Even the announcers talking about how bad the 2-3 format is.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 25788
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #287: October 05, 2012, 08:43:48 PM »
Charles Foxtrot

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 53833
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #288: October 05, 2012, 08:43:55 PM »
Looking more and more at the replay, the umpire's confusion seems to have stemmed from the SS calling off the LF. At the point where the SS calls off the LF the umpire raises his arm for the infield fly. Then the SS bails and the ball drops. It's inexcusable for the umpire to allow that to happen.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15531
  • Future
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #289: October 05, 2012, 08:44:02 PM »
Even the announcers talking about how bad the 2-3 format is.

but its a one year thing. but yea its still bad

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 30008
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #290: October 05, 2012, 08:44:32 PM »
but its a one year thing. but yea its still bad

That makes it even worse :lol:

Online CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11258
  • Be Loud * Be Proud * Be Positive
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #291: October 05, 2012, 08:44:37 PM »
Some like it.  Others dont.  I know I dont!

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22911
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #292: October 05, 2012, 08:44:46 PM »
You have to be under it to catch the ball you freaking idiot.

But that has nothing  to do with the call

"An INFIELD FLY is a fair fly ball (not including a line drive nor an attempted bunt) which can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort, when first and second, or first, second and third bases are occupied, before two are out. The pitcher, catcher and any outfielder who stations himself in the infield on the play shall be considered infielders for the purpose of this rule.
When it seems apparent that a batted ball will be an Infield Fly, the umpire shall immediately declare “Infield Fly” for the benefit of the runners"

You don't have to be "under it" when the call is made.

Oh and after watching the replay, he was under it. He had come to a stop and was looking directly up.

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 30008
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #293: October 05, 2012, 08:45:37 PM »
slate, just give it up.  You don't win internet points for being a contrarian.  Everyone's made their feelings known, I don't see any minds being changed here.

Online CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11258
  • Be Loud * Be Proud * Be Positive
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #294: October 05, 2012, 08:45:58 PM »
but its a one year thing. but yea its still bad

Ita only for this year?  Ive beencurious about that!

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 25788
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #295: October 05, 2012, 08:46:15 PM »
But that has nothing  to do with the call

"An INFIELD FLY is a fair fly ball (not including a line drive nor an attempted bunt) which can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort, when first and second, or first, second and third bases are occupied, before two are out. The pitcher, catcher and any outfielder who stations himself in the infield on the play shall be considered infielders for the purpose of this rule.
When it seems apparent that a batted ball will be an Infield Fly, the umpire shall immediately declare “Infield Fly” for the benefit of the runners"

You don't have to be "under it" when the call is made.

Hey!    Where's the beerman?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22911
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #296: October 05, 2012, 08:46:27 PM »
slate, just give it up.  You don't win internet points for being a contrarian.  Everyone's made their feelings known, I don't see any minds being changed here.

Yes, because  rules should be open to "feelings"

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22911
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #297: October 05, 2012, 08:47:28 PM »
Hey, let's talk about it instead of going to the other Wild Card game ....

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15531
  • Future
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #298: October 05, 2012, 08:48:14 PM »
Ita only for this year?  Ive beencurious about that!

Yeah. I forgot where I read it but since Selig introduced the second wild card slot after the schedule was already created, the NLDS had to be switched around a bit.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 25788
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Wild Card Round Discussion Thread
« Reply #299: October 05, 2012, 08:48:22 PM »
Hey, let's talk about it instead of going to the other Wild Card game ....

I'm with ya there.   We'll do it just to PO CAL.   :P