Author Topic: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3  (Read 5380 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LostYudite

  • Posts: 758
  • Naaaa'aah-titude
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #250: July 28, 2012, 08:45:08 PM »
She'd still look fine.

She'd be Smurfette.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 36748
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #251: July 28, 2012, 08:45:12 PM »
Phillies taking it in the ass from Mike Minor, freak them

Great analysis SF882.    Spot on ...

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 36748
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #252: July 28, 2012, 08:45:59 PM »

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4742
  • Natitude
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #253: July 28, 2012, 08:47:49 PM »
They call it "disposable income".


Ah as a college student I need that defined for me :lol: I will hopefully be able to afford such things down the road but my income is going towards other things right now :) thankfully tickets on stubhub day of are pretty cheap and I get half off tickets day of the box office with my college ID.

Offline Jordanz Meatballz

  • Posts: 4859
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #254: July 28, 2012, 08:47:58 PM »
Phillies are worthless. At least they're delusional, waste money, and will continue to be non-factors this decade.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 22644
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #255: July 28, 2012, 08:48:10 PM »
He didn't swing!

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91777
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #256: July 28, 2012, 08:48:28 PM »
Bullcrap call, he wasn't close to swinging

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 19179
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #257: July 28, 2012, 08:48:32 PM »
Yep. I've been thinking that it amounts to a trade of Willingham for Corey Brown. If Brown hits, then not such a big loss.

In the tiny sample size I've seen, he reminds me of Curtis Granderson.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 36748
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #258: July 28, 2012, 08:48:59 PM »
Ah as a college student I need that defined for me :lol: I will hopefully be able to afford such things down the road but my income is going towards other things right now :) thankfully tickets on stubhub day of are pretty cheap and I get half off tickets day of the box office with my college ID.

My son's at VCU.   I'm his disposable income.    :P

Offline LostYudite

  • Posts: 758
  • Naaaa'aah-titude
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #259: July 28, 2012, 08:49:23 PM »
Teh SPEEEEEEEEEEEEEED!!!

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 12389
  • Troll So Hard University
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #260: July 28, 2012, 08:49:29 PM »
Great analysis SF882.    Spot on ...

SF should start a blog.

Offline Jordanz Meatballz

  • Posts: 4859
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #261: July 28, 2012, 08:49:39 PM »
Ah as a college student I need that defined for me :lol: I will hopefully be able to afford such things down the road but my income is going towards other things right now :) thankfully tickets on stubhub day of are pretty cheap and I get half off tickets day of the box office with my college ID.

It gets better. Get good grades, practice interviewing, get a good job and waste big bucks on Nats stuff.

Living the dream.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 36748
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #262: July 28, 2012, 08:50:13 PM »
SF should start a blog.

He could call it "freak them".

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 29815
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #263: July 28, 2012, 08:50:16 PM »
The infield dirt is blue also.

I see what you did there.

I miss Vega.

Offline LostYudite

  • Posts: 758
  • Naaaa'aah-titude
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #264: July 28, 2012, 08:50:16 PM »
In the tiny sample size I've seen, he reminds me of Curtis Granderson.

Bullcrap.  In the tiny sample size I've seen, he reminds me of Willie Mays.  :D

Offline welch

  • Posts: 10400
  • Send the Tardis back for Bucky
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #265: July 28, 2012, 08:50:48 PM »
I'd love that. Blue hat, block white W on the road unis.  Blue hat, interlocking DC on the homes.  Probably too late to change the name to Grays because of brand investment, but you could make these the unis and just have "Nats" in place of Grays. And I love th font on both the front and the number.

Senators.

First pro team in Washington was the Nationals. Some time in the 1880's people began to call the team the Senators. The AL team was called the Senators until owners changed the name to Nationals about 1905. Officially Nationals until Calvin Griffith changed the name to Senators in about 1956...one story says that ownership thought it would change fans perception of the team, back in 1905, if they changed the name.

Best I remember, "Senators" was the most popular name for the 2005 team. MLB felt it more appropriate to pick "Nationals".

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 91777
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #266: July 28, 2012, 08:51:21 PM »
quick out galore

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 36748
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #267: July 28, 2012, 08:52:17 PM »
Senators.

First pro team in Washington was the Nationals. Some time in the 1880's people began to call the team the Senators. The AL team was called the Senators until owners changed the name to Nationals about 1905. Officially Nationals until Calvin Griffith changed the name to Senators in about 1956...one story says that ownership thought it would change fans perception of the team, back in 1905, if they changed the name.

Best I remember, "Senators" was the most popular name for the 2005 team. MLB felt it more appropriate to pick "Nationals".

Ya know welch, I enjoy the "stuff" you bring to the board.   Thanks   ..

Offline LostYudite

  • Posts: 758
  • Naaaa'aah-titude
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #268: July 28, 2012, 08:52:57 PM »
Senators.

Best I remember, "Senators" was the most popular name for the 2005 team. MLB felt it more appropriate to pick "Nationals".

I think it was because Texas still owns the copyrights to Senators for MLB, so Teddy would have had to have bought it from the Rangers.  Nationals has the historic roots you point out, without the copyright complications.

Online tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 29815
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #269: July 28, 2012, 08:53:31 PM »


Best I remember, "Senators" was the most popular name for the 2005 team. MLB felt it more appropriate to pick "Nationals".

Rangers owned the name "Senators", it would have cost $ to acquire.  Lerners voted for the cheaper option.    :mg:

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 22644
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #270: July 28, 2012, 08:54:06 PM »
Senators.

First pro team in Washington was the Nationals. Some time in the 1880's people began to call the team the Senators. The AL team was called the Senators until owners changed the name to Nationals about 1905. Officially Nationals until Calvin Griffith changed the name to Senators in about 1956...one story says that ownership thought it would change fans perception of the team, back in 1905, if they changed the name.

Best I remember, "Senators" was the most popular name for the 2005 team. MLB felt it more appropriate to pick "Nationals".


Offline LostYudite

  • Posts: 758
  • Naaaa'aah-titude
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #271: July 28, 2012, 08:54:25 PM »
Rangers owned the name "Senators", it would have cost $ to acquire.  Lerners voted for the cheaper option.    :mg:

WHY U IGNOR ME TERP?

Offline Jordanz Meatballz

  • Posts: 4859
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #272: July 28, 2012, 08:54:37 PM »
Senators is a pretty lame name. Glad they went with Nationals.

Grays jerseys are hot, but I dig the Nats jerseys, too, so it's fine.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 36748
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #273: July 28, 2012, 08:55:12 PM »
Z owns HGH man.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 22644
Re: Nationals @ Brewers, Game 3
« Reply #274: July 28, 2012, 08:55:36 PM »
Rangers owned the name "Senators", it would have cost $ to acquire.  Lerners voted for the cheaper option.    :mg:

But the Lerners weren't in the picture then, were they?  MLBAC?