Author Topic: Nats and the 2012 Non-Waiver Trade deadline watch  (Read 27554 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15528
  • Future

Maybe they're tired of missing wildly every time they try?


Lol this

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33617
  • Lets go to work
:panic:

Come on now... you're propping up post you know are extreme to make it seem as if a majority of people really feel that way. You know that's not the case.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 10965
He only posted one  :panic:. That's a single guy freaking out. Board freakout is multiple :panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic:

Offline Hondo

  • Posts: 603
I think it makes sense to go after a guy like Shields.  He has a club option of 9 mil for next year and 12 mil in 2014.  We get a replacement for Stras this year and Jackson next year, plus we'll net 2 mil in 2013 and upgrade the rotation.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 10965
There's an additional club option for 2014 I believe. What would they want for Shields?

Offline Hondo

  • Posts: 603
Is there any chance Laroche and the Nats simply pick up his 2013 mutual option (10 mil)?

Offline Hondo

  • Posts: 603
you are correct, 12 mil club option for 2014.

There's an additional club option for 2014 I believe. What would they want for Shields?


Offline Smithian

  • Posts: 5489
  • Team America 2014
He only posted one  :panic:. That's a single guy freaking out. Board freakout is multiple :panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic::panic:
:thumbs:

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14715
Is there any chance Laroche and the Nats simply pick up his 2013 mutual option (10 mil)?

Not if LaRoche thinks he can get more than $9 million (10 million - the buyout), then again maybe he wants to chase a ring and thinks this is as good a place as any?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22861
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/07/olney-on-marlins-rays-upton.html

Quote
•The Marlins will be willing to discuss every player on their roster, including Giancarlo Stanton, Josh Johnson and Omar Infante, if they decide to sell, Olney writes.



 :shock:  :az: :az: :az: :az:

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 17997
According to @Ken_Rosenthal #Nationals in on Dempster, Liriano & Greinke as well as CA Ramon Hernandez


Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22861
Oh dear sweet baseball jesus ... if you're there ... please, please let Stanton be tradeable. Please let your servant, Mike Rizzo, open his eyes and give him wisdom and guile to make the trade. Give your precious favored sons, the Lerners, the heart to open their purse strings.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13471
  • In the market for lavish mansions 'n NBA expansion
Wow, if they're willing to trade Stanton they must really be throwing in the towel.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15528
  • Future
I'm going to go ahead and say we don't trade for anybody.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
"They currently are using the tandem of Jesus Flores and Jhonatan Solano, and rank 12th in the NL at the position with a .666 OPS. Flores has thrown out only 4 of 37 runners attempting to steal."

yeah ... need an upgrade.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 22861
If only stolen bases was on the catcher :roll:

Ramos was throwing out a whopping 17% before he went down

Offline PebbleBall

  • Posts: 2671
  • Now that right there is baseball.
Throwing up the Dempster/Greinke smoke screen so Rizzo can sneak in and steal Ramon Hernandez.  I like it.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33617
  • Lets go to work
If only stolen bases was on the catcher :roll:

Ramos was throwing out a whopping 17% before he went down

Which still happens to be better than what Flores is doing. 8)

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 17997
Jayson Stark ‏@jaysonst
An exec of one team talking to the #Cubs said today they're working hard to move Ryan Dempster "by the end of the week."

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16119
  • No Trade Clause
I'd imagine the haul to get Stanton would be preposterous

Still, does it not delight the imagination?

(Kudos if you know what Movie that's from)

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
:lmao: slateman

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
stanton ain't moving

Offline wpa2629

  • Posts: 16119
  • No Trade Clause
What about Shields?

I'm intrigued by him

I think we get a pitcher (if we can make it work) and a catcher would be sweet

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33617
  • Lets go to work
What about Shields?

I'm intrigued by him

I think we get a pitcher (if we can make it work) and a catcher would be sweet

I'd love to get Shields.

Would bolster the rotation for the present and the future.