Author Topic: NFL Thread (2012)  (Read 21727 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 20573
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #450: April 26, 2012, 12:14:58 PM »
Good.

It's useless and no one watches it.


+1

Online blue911

  • Posts: 15556

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3605
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15352
  • Future

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10477
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 29978
  • Very 2014. Wow.
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #455: April 26, 2012, 05:59:25 PM »
YAHTZEE!!!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #456: April 26, 2012, 07:12:53 PM »
Minnesota and Cleveland swapped 1st rounders. It looks like Cleveland will select Trent Richardson 3rd overall.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11170
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #457: April 26, 2012, 07:18:04 PM »
I don't see the point in trading up one single slot.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15352
  • Future
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #458: April 26, 2012, 07:19:05 PM »
I don't see the point in trading up one single slot.

Couldn't the Vikings have just picked someone else? lol

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11170
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #459: April 26, 2012, 07:33:23 PM »
The Browns are colossal idiots.

They gave up a 4th, two 5ths and a 7th to move up one spot, when the Vikings weren't even going to pick Richardson anyway.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33368
  • Lets go to work
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #460: April 26, 2012, 07:45:09 PM »
The Browns are colossal idiots.

They gave up a 4th, two 5ths and a 7th to move up one spot, when the Vikings weren't even going to pick Richardson anyway.

It's to make sure someone doesn't trade to three to take Richardson.

But yes, it was a bad trade.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8025
  • It is what the Nats crave
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #461: April 26, 2012, 07:59:07 PM »
It's to make sure someone doesn't trade to three to take Richardson.

But yes, it was a bad trade.

Cleveland is desperate with an offense that is pretty bad and they need someone who can make a play now and then.   I think the Browns do have a bunch of other picks in this years draft so you make the move to get your man.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5023
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #462: April 26, 2012, 07:59:15 PM »
The Browns are colossal idiots.

They gave up a 4th, two 5ths and a 7th to move up one spot, when the Vikings weren't even going to pick Richardson anyway.

That's why the Browns are the Browns and will always continue to be the Browns.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8025
  • It is what the Nats crave
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #463: April 26, 2012, 08:00:41 PM »
better coverage NFL Network or ESPN?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 13721
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #464: April 26, 2012, 08:06:18 PM »
The Browns are colossal idiots.

They gave up a 4th, two 5ths and a 7th to move up one spot, when the Vikings weren't even going to pick Richardson anyway.


We gave up three 1s and a 2 to move 4 places

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5023
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #465: April 26, 2012, 08:06:22 PM »
better coverage NFL Network or ESPN?

Probably NFL Network, unless you can stomach more Mel Kiper on ESPN.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 48853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #466: April 26, 2012, 08:06:31 PM »
NFL Network.

The reason they made the trade is because Minnesota was pretty much letting them know that if they didn't do it they would trade with Tampa Bay and the bucs would end up with Richardson.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33368
  • Lets go to work
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #467: April 26, 2012, 08:07:36 PM »
The Browns are colossal idiots.

They gave up a 4th, two 5ths and a 7th to move up one spot, when the Vikings weren't even going to pick Richardson anyway.

Only one fifth.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8025
  • It is what the Nats crave
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #468: April 26, 2012, 08:08:38 PM »
Berk and Spidey I'll follow your lead...DirecTv 212 it is

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33368
  • Lets go to work
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #469: April 26, 2012, 08:17:45 PM »
Sadly ESPN is actually out doing the NFL Network in coverage so far.

NFL Network is too many talking heads and way too many graphics on the screen.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23171
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #470: April 26, 2012, 08:30:51 PM »
I really hope Michael Floyd doesn't go to an NFC East team.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36987
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #471: April 26, 2012, 08:36:17 PM »
The Cowboys get the Redskins pick at #6 from St. Louis.  That's too close to a trade between the Redskins and the Cowboys for my liking!

Offline PC

  • Posts: 36987
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #472: April 26, 2012, 08:38:12 PM »
"The paper", Chris Berman?  The paper???

Offline imref

  • Posts: 15381
  • In Matt We Trust!
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #473: April 26, 2012, 08:46:20 PM »
Did the crowd just say "what?" After goodell paused?

Do we get a "yes yes yes" chant next?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 15381
  • In Matt We Trust!
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #474: April 26, 2012, 08:47:36 PM »
This crowd is awesome!