Author Topic: NFL Thread (2012)  (Read 23959 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 24490
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1350: January 12, 2013, 09:41:15 PM »
?  Oh, Tebow?

Is there some other Chosen One I'm not aware of in the NFL?

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 26791
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1351: January 12, 2013, 09:43:40 PM »
Is there some other Chosen One I'm not aware of in the NFL?

My bad    ....

Online GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12685
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1352: January 12, 2013, 09:44:01 PM »
Maybe. It might increase defensive scoring. Who knows. I think it's too subjective a penalty to call. It gets missed a lot, or called when it's not there.

Then, like hockey, football would become a game of defense.  Let's face it - football is popular because of scoring.  Doing away with interference would inhibit scoring

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15141
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1353: January 12, 2013, 09:52:29 PM »
Maybe. It might increase defensive scoring. Who knows. I think it's too subjective a penalty to call. It gets missed a lot, or called when it's not there.

Corners would just tackle receivers the second the qb released the ball-it would be unbearably bad

Online GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12685
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1354: January 12, 2013, 09:54:26 PM »
Kaepernick is a good QB.

Online GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12685
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1355: January 12, 2013, 09:55:07 PM »
You'd have to let the receivers be more physical, too.
Corners would just tackle receivers the second the qb released the ball-it would be unbearably bad

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15141
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1356: January 12, 2013, 09:56:05 PM »
You'd have to let the receivers be more physical, too.

If two guys are knocking the crap out of each other,  no one is catching the ball

Online GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12685
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1357: January 12, 2013, 09:57:35 PM »
Wrestle the corner down and you are wide open...

If two guys are knocking the crap out of each other,  no one is catching the ball

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4725
  • Natitude
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1358: January 12, 2013, 09:58:09 PM »
Wasn't Alex Smith the starting QB last year?


Online GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12685
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1359: January 12, 2013, 09:58:49 PM »
Got injured and couldn't get his starting job back.
Wasn't Alex Smith the starting QB last year?

Offline lastobjective

  • Posts: 4725
  • Natitude
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1360: January 12, 2013, 10:03:32 PM »
Got injured and couldn't get his starting job back.
Thanks.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15141
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1361: January 12, 2013, 10:07:27 PM »
Great example of why players hide injury

Offline imref

  • Posts: 17614
  • Like my arm slot?
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1362: January 12, 2013, 10:22:09 PM »
OK, this Kaepernick kid is pretty good.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 24490
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1363: January 12, 2013, 10:51:22 PM »
Kap is having his way with GB

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 4614
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1364: January 12, 2013, 11:30:06 PM »
I remember back during the 2011 draft when everyone assumed that Buffalo would take Kaepernick in the second round. They didn't. They took cornerback Aaron Williams instead. Right before Cinci and Buffalo took Andy Dalton and Kaepernick. Nice job, Buddy Nix.

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33840
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1365: January 12, 2013, 11:48:50 PM »
Nix is senile.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 18108
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1366: January 13, 2013, 10:09:21 AM »
I'd like to see the NFL do away with interference calls. All contact is okay (except spearing a defenseless receiver).
Mike Martz would like to have a word with you.   Those kind of rules won the Pats 3 Super Bowls.

The whining from Dungy and the Colts GM led to the current state of play.  It be fun to see it called that way now against the Pats now that they are the air circus.

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14322
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1367: January 13, 2013, 01:44:42 PM »
I hope the Seahawks get annihilated for being dirty mother freakers.  Especially Browner.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11035
  • babble on
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1368: January 13, 2013, 01:49:35 PM »
A pox on both their houses
I hope the Seahawks get annihilated for being dirty mother freakers.  Especially Browner.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13611
  • PK Subban will eat your soul.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1369: January 13, 2013, 02:08:58 PM »
I hope the Seahawks get annihilated for being dirty mother freakers.  Especially Browner.

Dirty?  U mad bro?

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 26791
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1370: January 13, 2013, 02:14:14 PM »
This game is gettin' ugly.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41034
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1371: January 13, 2013, 02:32:00 PM »
This is the real Seattle Seahawks...

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15141
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1372: January 13, 2013, 02:43:20 PM »
Why are surprised Seattle sucks on the road- every team they beat on the road this year either fired their GM or coach,  that doesn't exactly speak to any quality wins

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13611
  • PK Subban will eat your soul.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1373: January 13, 2013, 02:45:21 PM »
Didn't they beat the LANDOVER FORESKINZ last week?

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 26791
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #1374: January 13, 2013, 02:52:38 PM »
Didn't they beat the LANDOVER FORESKINZ last week?

My thought as well about Washington firing Allen or Shannie.    :P