Author Topic: NFL Thread (2012)  (Read 22488 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 3777
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #850: October 05, 2012, 01:36:32 AM »
Arizona's weaknesses on offense were clearly shown tonight. They have absolutely no running game, forcing them to have Kolb throw a lot, but their line sucks so much, he gets hammered before he can get good throws off.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 3777
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #851: October 07, 2012, 01:54:25 AM »
Larry Johnson arrested for assaulting a woman for the fifth time. Hope he actually goes to prison this time. Not like that will do anything though. He's simply a piece of crap and likely will always be a piece of crap.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52173
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #852: October 07, 2012, 08:26:48 AM »
Those PSU guys are model citizens. They beat up on chicks and rape children.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3776
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #853: October 07, 2012, 09:17:03 AM »
Those PSU guys are model citizens. They beat up on chicks and rape children.

I'm guessing you're being sarcastic, but you're painting with an awfully large brush, don't you think? The "vocal minority" so-to-speak hasn't done PSU any favors and definitely cast a terrible shadow on the school without even mentioning the victims of these needless crimes, but the vast majority of PSU fans/players etc are blameless here. I'm not at all upset however with the attempt at culture change in Happy Valley now though.

Makes me very thankful for Randy Edsal.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13883
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #854: October 07, 2012, 12:35:37 PM »
Terpfan: it's called "trolling PANatsFan" aka spidernat's favorite pastime.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 16557
  • Like my arm slot?
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #855: October 07, 2012, 04:02:27 PM »
could Indy beat GB?

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #856: October 07, 2012, 04:11:50 PM »
Jay Cutler sucks.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11563
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #857: October 07, 2012, 04:12:49 PM »
Nice win for the Steelers. Mendenhall back and the defense destroyed Vick all day. Just hope Woodley and Polamalu are OK.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 16557
  • Like my arm slot?
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #858: October 07, 2012, 05:14:59 PM »
Colts win, amazing.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33572
  • Lets go to work
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #859: October 07, 2012, 08:22:36 PM »
Faith Hill looks better every time I see her!

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33572
  • Lets go to work
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #860: October 07, 2012, 08:54:46 PM »
I can't believe I'm about to say this... but I wish there was less passing in the NFL.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33572
  • Lets go to work
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #861: October 07, 2012, 08:58:20 PM »
And there's the record.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 23756
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #862: October 08, 2012, 09:47:33 AM »
Faith Hill looks better every time I see her!

You "sound" like my buddy on this Faith Hill.   :P     Guess I gotta google her so see 1) who she is and 2) what she looks like.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #863: October 11, 2012, 11:45:12 PM »

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83602
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #864: October 11, 2012, 11:46:52 PM »
Mike Tomlin lost this game for the Steelers attempting a 54 yard FG with weak-footed Suisham. Idiotic. Punt it deep. Too much time left to risk a miss and giving them the ball in good field position.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52173
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #865: October 12, 2012, 01:54:29 PM »
Did anyone hear about the slip up by Vick where he tweeted a picture in his house and there was a box of milk bone biscuits visible?  :lmao:  He ended up having to admit that he has a dog even though he's not supposed to own a dog while on probation (is he still on probation?).



Offline Vega

  • Posts: 3777
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #867: October 14, 2012, 04:36:50 PM »
Russell Wilson is shredding New England.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52173
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #868: October 15, 2012, 03:10:08 PM »
Ravens defense was decimated yesterday in their win over Dallas. They lost Webb for the year. Lewis may be lost as well and Ngata sprained his knee. Plus Suggs won't be coming back anytime soon.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 23756
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #869: October 15, 2012, 03:10:54 PM »
Ravens defense was decimated yesterday in their win over Dallas. They lost Webb for the year. Lewis may be lost as well and Ngata sprained his knee. Plus Suggs won't be coming back anytime soon.

Aw   ...   

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52173
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #870: October 15, 2012, 03:11:20 PM »

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52173
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #871: October 15, 2012, 03:30:38 PM »
Dallas was gashing the Ravens defense on the ground even with their backup RB's.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 23756
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #872: October 15, 2012, 03:34:46 PM »
Dallas was gashing the Ravens defense on the ground even with their backup RB's.

Heard on TOP today that this is the first time in franchise history that they've given up 200 yards rushing in back to back weeks.   What?    No love for the Browns?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52173
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #873: October 15, 2012, 03:35:39 PM »
:rofl:  You know what they meant.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 23756
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: NFL Thread (2012)
« Reply #874: October 15, 2012, 03:46:59 PM »
:rofl:  You know what they meant.

Yeah, they're ignoring their past.    After all, we don't ignore the Expos.