Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 62555 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67163
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #300: April 19, 2012, 08:22:16 AM »
:shock:

They won't travel west of the central time zone all season. In fact, they travel to NO and St Louis the first two weeks and don't leave the eastern time zone until the Thanksgiving game in Dallas.

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7786
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #301: April 19, 2012, 10:57:36 AM »
According to Schefter, Colts have officially told Luck that he will be the #1 pick.  As expected, Redskins will take RGIII.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #302: April 19, 2012, 11:33:13 AM »
Now someone says RGIII has "problems" or something and this whole area is having a fit. This is why I hate D.C fans. Go from not giving a freak about the Redskins, to now wanting to defend them. I'm close to quitting on sports, hate fake fanbases.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67163
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #303: April 19, 2012, 11:38:29 AM »
InaneBoost

Offline Tokeydog

  • Posts: 1236
  • I like beer!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #304: April 19, 2012, 11:41:35 AM »
Now someone says RGIII has "problems" or something and this whole area is having a fit. This is why I hate D.C fans. Go from not giving a freak about the Redskins, to now wanting to defend them. I'm close to quitting on sports, hate fake fanbases.



Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 42118
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #305: April 19, 2012, 11:56:55 AM »
Who says RGIII has problems? I don't consider having too much money a "problem"

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19026
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #306: April 19, 2012, 11:58:12 AM »
Who says RGIII has problems? I don't consider having too much money a "problem"

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2012/04/scout-robert-griffin-iii-has-a-selfish-streak/1#.T5A15Y78HsE

unnamed scouts- this happens every year- guy rises, people praise him, then rip him, then move on to the next guy

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 42118
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #307: April 19, 2012, 12:37:18 PM »
Well, this is the first we've really heard anything bad about Griffin. Even Luck has had more detractors at this point

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #308: April 19, 2012, 01:55:58 PM »
It's just an idiot making a name for themselves. Peyton Manning and Brady both were known for telling their teams they'd be stupid not to draft them, etc, going to make the NFL pay for not taking them. Nothing new.

Just jerks who realize they can't bash the Redskins anymore, so they're getting one last jab in. Why this fanbase just can't laugh makes no sense.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 53391
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #309: April 19, 2012, 01:57:08 PM »
:shock:

They won't travel west of the central time zone all season. In fact, they travel to NO and St Louis the first two weeks and don't leave the eastern time zone until the Thanksgiving game in Dallas.

The good news is they can only lose 3 games in the other time zones.


Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 19026
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #310: April 19, 2012, 01:58:03 PM »
It's just an idiot making a name for themselves. Peyton Manning and Brady both were known for telling their teams they'd be stupid not to draft them, etc, going to make the NFL pay for not taking them. Nothing new.

Just jerks who realize they can't bash the Redskins anymore, so they're getting one last jab in. Why this fanbase just can't laugh makes no sense.

how are they making a name- the sources are anonymous? as far as bashing the redskins anymore, get back to me when we win a superbowl, because until then anyone can bash away

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10724
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #311: April 19, 2012, 06:11:30 PM »
Got an issue of Sports Illustrated today about Luck or RGIII and who would be #1 or some such crap, not sure which one of them was on the cover.  Didn't read it yet as I was heading out the door to work.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #312: April 19, 2012, 07:03:26 PM »
how are they making a name- the sources are anonymous? as far as bashing the redskins anymore, get back to me when we win a superbowl, because until then anyone can bash away

The names always come out, don't be stupid. It's just like the anonymous source for the Saints. They'll be ousted soon. Well in that case, all 31 teams can be bashed right now ROFL.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11326
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #313: April 19, 2012, 07:19:31 PM »
The names always come out, don't be stupid. It's just like the anonymous source for the Saints. They'll be ousted soon. Well in that case, all 31 teams can be bashed right now ROFL.

One team can't.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 14893
  • I am Djour Djilios.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #314: April 19, 2012, 07:21:17 PM »
not sure which one of them was on the cover.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10724
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #315: April 19, 2012, 07:23:17 PM »
 :confused:

I don't follow football that closely.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10724
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #316: April 20, 2012, 04:12:34 PM »
Got an issue of Sports Illustrated today about Luck or RGIII and who would be #1 or some such crap, not sure which one of them was on the cover.  Didn't read it yet as I was heading out the door to work.

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

:confused:

I don't follow football that closely.

 :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #317: April 26, 2012, 06:28:24 PM »
Current wait line to get into FedExField for the Redskins draft viewing:


Offline DC_Nats

  • Posts: 122
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #318: April 26, 2012, 06:50:41 PM »
Current wait line to get into FedExField for the Redskins draft viewing:


I'm all for tailgating and going to games but I've never quite understood this. I wouldn't even want to go to RCMH to witness the draft in person. What gives? Am i missing something? :shrug:

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #319: April 26, 2012, 06:59:38 PM »
Not to sure either. Draft Day parties are fun because the first round pick is there to answer questions, along with former and current players signing autographs, but just to watch the draft? No idea myself.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67163
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #320: April 26, 2012, 07:14:45 PM »
Current wait line to get into FedExField for the Redskins draft viewing:

(Image removed from quote.)

Idiots.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5025
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #321: April 26, 2012, 07:58:15 PM »
Redskins might shock the world and take Ryan Tannehill. What are your inside sources saying Boost?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 67163
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #322: April 26, 2012, 08:07:39 PM »
:lmao:  They've already come out and said they would take Griffin.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10724
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #323: April 26, 2012, 08:14:17 PM »
Redskins took RGIII :panic: :panic: :panic: :panic: :panic: :panic: :panic:

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 21582
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #324: April 26, 2012, 08:15:25 PM »
S H O C K I N G   C H O I C E !!!!!!!!!



Now The Lavar Arrington Show on 106.7 FM can spend 5 hours per day discussing:

RGIII: Boxers or Briefs?  And other important issues...