Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 31424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #275: April 13, 2012, 02:22:25 PM »
Redskins negotiating with London Fletcher according to Shefter. It's about damn time.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #276: April 13, 2012, 02:23:00 PM »
Redskins negotiating with London Fletcher according to Shefter. It's about damn time.

yea seriously.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 24180
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #277: April 13, 2012, 02:25:18 PM »
They've been negotiating the whole time. Fletcher wants more money than the Skins were offering. So they let him test the free agent market. He realizes that he'll get a similar deal here.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #278: April 13, 2012, 02:30:16 PM »
^  I thought you had me on ignore?    :|  This still should've already been done because he's such a key component of the team. I'm sure had they not been penalized they would've already signed him but that's not really an excuse in my book.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15054
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #279: April 13, 2012, 02:37:48 PM »
He wants to be paid as an elite mlb- the skins can't afford that

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 24180
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #280: April 13, 2012, 02:38:15 PM »
^  I thought you had me on ignore?    :|  This still should've already been done because he's such a key component of the team. I'm sure had they not been penalized they would've already signed him but that's not really an excuse in my book.

No. Only SF. And I think Hammonds. But that was because he was basically on both knees with baby wipes and goggles about his precious Orioles

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #281: April 13, 2012, 02:38:59 PM »
No. Only SF. And I think Hammonds. But that was because he was basically on both knees with baby wipes and goggles about his precious Orioles

:lmao:  @ hammonds drooling over the birds. Today he's been drooling over the yankees.  :?

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 26672
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #282: April 13, 2012, 04:52:17 PM »
Looking through some "stuff" and found this:


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #283: April 13, 2012, 06:25:54 PM »
It cost 20 bucks to attend the NFC championship game against dallas.  :shock:  Now it cost more than that to just park at a preseason game.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #284: April 14, 2012, 06:59:34 PM »
London Fletcher officially back in the fold. He signed a two year deal.  :clap:  They also signed two CB's, Madieu Williams and Tanard Jackson

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #285: April 15, 2012, 07:46:09 AM »
It cost 20 bucks to attend the NFC championship game against dallas.  :shock:  Now it cost more than that to just park at a preseason game.
sec 514 is basically in the parking lot

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 26672
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #286: April 15, 2012, 09:54:42 AM »
sec 514 is basically in the parking lot


$20 and it was the LAST row.    LOL    But what a freakin' day.   The guy in the row in front of us had a little 5" color TV, NFC Championship ... 'skins vs Dallas and I didn't care who won (though my buddy did), Randy White got knocked the freak out, etc.    I had a pint of apricot brandy and a gram  .... and you're worried about where the seats were.    Sheesh  ... :roll:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #287: April 15, 2012, 11:47:06 AM »
^  Danny White.

And yeah being at a championship game for $20 is a great deal. It costs 3 times that amount to sit in the last row at Fed Ex to watch a preseason game.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 26672
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #288: April 15, 2012, 12:25:41 PM »
^  Danny White.

And yeah being at a championship game for $20 is a great deal. It costs 3 times that amount to sit in the last row at Fed Ex to watch a preseason game.

Man, I really was freaked up.   LOL   Of course, it was Danny.   My bad  ...   BTW   Didn't like Randy White either.   Hell, it could have been Betty White we were so far away.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #289: April 15, 2012, 01:04:11 PM »
:lmao:

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #290: April 15, 2012, 10:21:32 PM »

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #291: April 15, 2012, 10:26:11 PM »
$20 and it was the LAST row.    LOL    But what a freakin' day.   The guy in the row in front of us had a little 5" color TV, NFC Championship ... 'skins vs Dallas and I didn't care who won (though my buddy did), Randy White got knocked the freak out, etc.    I had a pint of apricot brandy and a gram  .... and you're worried about where the seats were.    Sheesh  ... :roll:



:lol:

I don't drink apricot brandy nor do drugs, so I guess seating is important to me :lol:

I'm getting hooked on live soccer, but it sucks on TV (relevant because of RFK)

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 26672
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #292: April 16, 2012, 07:13:00 AM »


:lol:

I don't drink apricot brandy nor do drugs, so I guess seating is important to me :lol:

I'm getting hooked on live soccer, but it sucks on TV (relevant because of RFK)

That was 29 years ago.   I'm more mature now.   :)     I'm lovin' some soccer myself.    Got into it as a youngster and have liked it ever since.


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #293: April 16, 2012, 08:29:51 AM »
PANatsFan prefers apple martinis.


Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13592
  • Ain't nothing but a peanut.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #294: April 16, 2012, 10:47:22 AM »

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #295: April 17, 2012, 07:11:29 PM »
Redskins open up in NO and don't have a home game until September 3 against the bengals. Only one prime time game (Monday night at home against the giants).  :clap:  Only one division game before November.  :shock:  The games after the bye are brutal. 5 of the seven against division opponents including Thanksgiving in Dallas. One against the ravens.  :hang:

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 26672
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #296: April 17, 2012, 07:27:47 PM »
Redskins open up in NO and don't have a home game until September 3 against the bengals. Only one prime time game (Monday night at home against the giants).  :clap:  Only one division game before November.  :shock:  The games after the bye are brutal. 5 of the seven against division opponents including Thanksgiving in Dallas. One against the ravens.  :hang:

Of course, I'm interested as to when they play the Steelers?     :P   October 28 at Pittsburgh ... gotta call my sister.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15054
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #297: April 17, 2012, 07:45:41 PM »
Redskins open up in NO

I think we can all support Drew Brees in his refusal to sign the franchise tender and hope roger suspends anyone associated with the saints defense under greg williams for at least one game

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #298: April 17, 2012, 07:55:35 PM »
Vilma and probably one or two others are slated to be suspended for that game.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #299: April 18, 2012, 10:19:48 PM »
Should be a W in NO. We usually always win there, mix in suspensions / all bounty talk, their heads are going to be screwed. I think we have a good shot at opening 4-0 or 3-1.