Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 30801 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #200: March 18, 2012, 06:24:44 PM »
Why did the Redskins not sign Eric Winston.

Let's see ... good RT who can shift to LT if needed? Yes, we need that.
Understands the ZBS? Oh yea, he's been doing it since he came in the league
In his prime? Yup ... 28 years old


But thank God we got Garcon ...

Was Winston cut before or after Garcon?
Did we not get smacked with half our cap coming off?
Is Winston making more than 2.1 mil this year?

Armchair GM's, gotta love them.

Online KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 13965
  • Lerners = Bluth family
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #201: March 18, 2012, 06:26:22 PM »
Some people loved Eischen for whatever reason. What's funny is that Matt LeCroy actually became a coach.  :lol:


I loved Eischen, but he's the last guy I'd want as a coach.  I might hire him as a hitman or something.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53790
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #202: March 18, 2012, 06:28:53 PM »
I loved Eischen, but he's the last guy I'd want as a coach.  I might hire him as a hitman or something.

It's just nostalgia. Let's not forget Willie Harris. That's about a dozen names we've come up with already. Eischen was intense though.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37017
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #203: March 18, 2012, 06:58:24 PM »
Yes it is, although it would be absolutely hilarious if they didn't.
Maybe he took tips from those creepy guys that teach nerds how to trick women into liking them and wantgs to psych out the colts.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22887
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #204: March 18, 2012, 07:05:23 PM »
Was Winston cut before or after Garcon?
Did we not get smacked with half our cap coming off?
Is Winston making more than 2.1 mil this year?

Armchair GM's, gotta love them.

Yes
Didn't seem to stop them from spending a crap ton of money on Garcon
I'm pretty sure the Skins could make his cap hit whatever it needed to be

Bottom line is that the Redskins needed Winston more than they needed Garcon. In fact, offensive line is probably the most critical need on the team after QB.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53790
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #205: March 18, 2012, 07:08:07 PM »
DB

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14718
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #206: March 18, 2012, 07:34:20 PM »
Yes
Didn't seem to stop them from spending a crap ton of money on Garcon
I'm pretty sure the Skins could make his cap hit whatever it needed to be

Bottom line is that the Redskins needed Winston more than they needed Garcon. In fact, offensive line is probably the most critical need on the team after QB.

did you see the receivers last year?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22887
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #207: March 18, 2012, 07:52:49 PM »
did you see the receivers last year?

Did you see us  starting non-drafted free agents at the most important position on the offensive line?

Not saying we shouldn't be perusing receivers, but they've done nothing to bolster an offensive line that is injury/suspension prone.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14718
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #208: March 18, 2012, 08:08:12 PM »
I'm hoping they can find someone in the third round since zone blocking type linemen slip

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33617
  • Lets go to work
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #209: March 18, 2012, 08:11:19 PM »
Hankerson is a stud.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22887
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #210: March 18, 2012, 08:13:34 PM »
I'm hoping they can find someone in the third round since zone blocking type linemen slip

Oh no doubt. But I would prefer to fill as many holes as possible and not have to rely on 4th and 5th round rookies to have to be depended on as starters.

Hankerson is a stud.
We hope.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2810
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #211: March 18, 2012, 09:02:21 PM »
Excellent recall coladar. I knew there were more that I had forgotten. Both of those were suggested as hitting coaches. :clap:  :lmao:

Funny thing is Castilla ends up being a coach very shortly after retirement... Just not with us.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53790
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #212: March 18, 2012, 09:09:40 PM »
Hankerson is a stud.

Are you just trying to piss off SF?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53790
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #213: March 18, 2012, 09:11:31 PM »
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/18/rex-grossman-promises-to-be-a-good-soldier/


Say what you want about Rexy's talent or lack there of, the guy sure seems like a team player. I think he'll be OK as a back up... just so long as it stays that way.


So it's official. RGIII will be the signal caller for Washington in 2012.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22887
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #214: March 18, 2012, 09:26:51 PM »
So it's official. RGIII will be the signal caller for Washington in 2012.

Unless of course the Colts draft him

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53790
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #215: March 18, 2012, 09:45:28 PM »
Unless of course the Colts draft him

Either way, whoever they draft will have to beat out the incumbent, Rex Grossman III.   :mg:

Online MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13472
  • In the market for lavish mansions 'n NBA expansion
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #216: March 18, 2012, 09:45:59 PM »
Nobody beats me.  I need that veteran's minimum!!!

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 22887
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #217: March 18, 2012, 09:48:18 PM »
Nobody beats me.  I need that veteran's minimum!!!

Dude, you get way more than the vet minimum. After all, Daddy has to make sure little Kyle has someone to play with during the game :)

Online imref

  • Posts: 16839
  • Like my arm slot?
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #218: March 19, 2012, 11:47:16 AM »
a friend sent this along:

Quote
about the Redskins re-signing Rex Grossman. The Redskins now have "RG3" and "RG3 and out

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 53790
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #219: March 19, 2012, 11:58:55 AM »
It appears Grossman was also named after his father and grandfather so technically he was RGIII first.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 16298
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #220: March 19, 2012, 12:35:53 PM »
It appears Grossman was also named after his father and grandfather so technically he was RGIII first.

I wonder what they sucked at.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 25744
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #221: March 19, 2012, 01:38:00 PM »
I wonder what they sucked at.

From Wiki:    His father and grandfather were football players for Indiana University. His grandfather, Rex, also played for the Baltimore Colts (1948–1950) and Detroit Lions (1950), playing in 12 games during his career.[80] He resides in Bloomington, Indiana during the offseason with his wife Alison Miska, to whom he has been married since July 9, 2005.[81] Grossman also has a sister and nephew who live in Lincolnwood, Illinois, and his parents are friends with Archie Manning.[82]

Looks like they sucked at football as well.   It's a genetic disorder.


Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33617
  • Lets go to work
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #222: March 19, 2012, 02:18:52 PM »
a friend sent this along:


Stole that from Czabe this morning.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 4040
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #223: March 19, 2012, 03:44:27 PM »
Laron Landry to the Jets on a one year, $4 million deal.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15528
  • Future
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #224: March 19, 2012, 03:56:53 PM »
Our starting safeties next year are __________ and _________