Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 30518 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84935
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #50: March 12, 2012, 09:16:36 PM »
freak I love Bruce Allen:

Outstanding. The Redskins abided by the rules. They will win this battle. Bullcrap from the NFL

Offline d_mc_nabb

  • Posts: 778
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #51: March 12, 2012, 09:27:17 PM »
I think the Redskins should sue over this- the NFL wouldn't pursue it for fear of violating Anti-Trust laws, and regardless would likely be fighting a losing battle.

It would be classic Colts to forgo Luck in favor of Griffin, just because. I wouldn't complain in that scenario.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #52: March 12, 2012, 09:33:19 PM »
Ah, Bach.    LOL    Thanks Linty.



Nice M*A*S*H* reference. I was thinking about M*A*S*H* the other day when I was looking at the Huey at the Udvar-Hazy center.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11584
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #53: March 12, 2012, 09:35:59 PM »
Roger Goodell inventing rules retroactively again than for no other reason than to be a dickhead to everyone. What a guy.

Offline Terpfan76

  • Posts: 3809
  • ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #54: March 12, 2012, 11:34:50 PM »
Wow... Didn't know anything about this. How the hell can they punish them when the league signed off on the contracts? If they didn't want it done, don't sign off on said contracts. I think we know Danny Boy isn't afraid to sue, so let's see what happens.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52930
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #55: March 12, 2012, 11:42:26 PM »
freak I love Bruce Allen:


Yeah what the freak! Every contract goes through the NFL office and has to be approved so how can they come back with this crap now. :bang:

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #56: March 13, 2012, 12:07:40 AM »
You can't tell me this wasn't planned. Almost exactly 1 day before free agency this happens? It's a load of bullcrap, a sham. On the other hand:


Online Kevrock

  • Posts: 10873
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #57: March 13, 2012, 06:08:02 AM »
I worry that RG3 could be the next JaMarcus Russell.

As college players, they don't remind me of each other at all.

I watched much less CFB in recent years, but I saw the Russell bust coming from a mile away. I didn't see RG3 enough to have a strong opinion, but he didn't remind me of Russell.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #58: March 13, 2012, 06:56:21 AM »
I didn't see RG3 enough to have a strong opinion, but he didn't remind me of Russell.

He's a more intelligent guy than JokeMarcus and doesn't share many characteristics to him as a player, but if the crapihans are going to have him conform to "The System™" it's going to be a total disaster.  In other words, he might be a bust if the FORESKINZ draft him but it wouldn't be his fault.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #59: March 13, 2012, 07:06:11 AM »
As college players, they don't remind me of each other at all.

I watched much less CFB in recent years, but I saw the Russell bust coming from a mile away. I didn't see RG3 enough to have a strong opinion, but he didn't remind me of Russell.



He's a junior and will need to be PAID, I just meant a complete and total disaster for tons of cash cash money.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 16215
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #60: March 13, 2012, 07:11:41 AM »
He's a more intelligent guy than JokeMarcus and doesn't share many characteristics to him as a player, but if the crapihans are going to have him conform to "The System™" it's going to be a total disaster.  In other words, he might be a bust if the FORESKINZ draft him but it wouldn't be his fault.


Am I to infer that you believe Griffin is a "System" quarterback?

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #61: March 13, 2012, 07:16:59 AM »
Am I to infer that you believe Griffin is a "System" quarterback?

But not "The System™".

Online blue911

  • Posts: 16215
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #62: March 13, 2012, 07:33:50 AM »
But not "The System™".

That isn't an answer.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14569
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #63: March 13, 2012, 07:41:43 AM »


He's a junior and will need to be PAID, I just meant a complete and total disaster for tons of cash cash money.
Rookie wage scale

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #64: March 13, 2012, 07:55:26 AM »
That isn't an answer.

Baylor was a spread system, so yes.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 24419
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #66: March 13, 2012, 08:11:09 AM »
Nice M*A*S*H* reference. I was thinking about M*A*S*H* the other day when I was looking at the Huey at the Udvar-Hazy center.

Think I've seen every TV episode but never saw the movie.


Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14569
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #67: March 13, 2012, 08:11:49 AM »
Think I've seen every TV episode but never saw the movie.



Wise choice

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 24419
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #68: March 13, 2012, 08:16:32 AM »
Wise choice

I was busy (drafted) when the movie came out.    :)


Online blue911

  • Posts: 16215
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #69: March 13, 2012, 08:16:47 AM »
Baylor was a spread system, so yes.

Then the problem isn't Shanahan's system. Frankly, if the only system Griffin can thrive in is the spread, he's just another Colt Brennan.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #70: March 13, 2012, 08:53:53 AM »
Then the problem isn't Shanahan's system. Frankly, if the only system Griffin can thrive in is the spread, he's just another Colt Brennan.

I see what you're saying but I think you're missing my clowning on crapihan and his Mythical System®.  I don't think RGIII is going to thrive in that kind of system (under center > 50% of the time) so it looks like we're on the same page.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #71: March 13, 2012, 10:23:20 AM »
LOL, so now the NFL docked 18mil off this year. Could have sworn they said we could split the money however we wanted. That being take it all this year, all next year, some this year some next. Interesting how they're making our decision for us.

Can't wait till the Redskins fight this, NFL is in for a rude awakening. Personally, think the reason they're docking it, is because next year we are so low, we can take almost all of the hit and still have like 20 mil to spend. They're trying to screw us, plain and simple.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 84935
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #72: March 13, 2012, 10:43:53 AM »
I thought they had to take all of the penalty in either this season or next season.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33585
  • Lets go to work
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #73: March 13, 2012, 11:02:54 AM »
I don't think RGIII is a system QB.

I think he'll be a solid NFL QB from day one.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14569
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #74: March 13, 2012, 11:17:22 AM »
I don't think RGIII is a system QB.

I think he'll be a solid NFL QB from day one.

who knows the recent history of big 12 qbs in the nfl is less than storied