Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 33583 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Boss Dealwiler

  • Posts: 144
  • Hit the lights.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1275: November 04, 2012, 04:01:35 PM »
FORESKINZ 4 DA LOSS.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11876
  • babble on
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1276: November 04, 2012, 04:12:32 PM »
I do like the kit. 

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 33009
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1277: November 04, 2012, 04:14:32 PM »
I do like the kit. 

Like the jerseys and the plain helmet.

Offline Boss Dealwiler

  • Posts: 144
  • Hit the lights.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1278: November 04, 2012, 04:15:36 PM »
The empty lower bowl makes me happy. Not as happy as Mike crapihan being dragged over flaming broken glass behind my Maserati at 100mph, but happy regardless.

Offline OldChelsea

  • Posts: 6276
  • From the best seat in the house at Nationals Park
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1279: November 04, 2012, 04:24:51 PM »
Hey the London cops are playing Crawley town (League 4?  Maybe even below that) in an FA Cup game if you want to watch some roundball

[edit: there's only one active cop playing for Metropolitan Police]


Crawley Town are actually in third place in League One (third tier of English footie) at present - not bad for a club only in their second season ever in the Football League. Like Stevenage which entered the League only in 2010, they've been moving up fast, at least within the lower divisions (Stevenage made the playoff pool last season).

Offline Boss Dealwiler

  • Posts: 144
  • Hit the lights.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1280: November 04, 2012, 04:26:13 PM »
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Brian Mitchell on FORESKINZ Post-Game Live - "the Redskins are a terrible team with terrible players and terrible playcalling".

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11876
  • babble on
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1281: November 04, 2012, 04:26:15 PM »
There's probably a longer line for that than for Virginia vehicle inspections. 

Not as happy as Mike crapihan being dragged over flaming broken glass behind my Maserati at 100mph, but happy regardless.


Online spidernat

  • Posts: 57853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1282: November 04, 2012, 04:45:51 PM »
PS Royster's been huge today

:lmao: typical bullcrap from the pedo lover. Royster showed what he's about today. He got owned in pass protection and got Griffin killed on one play and then when he was the lead blocker on the 4th and goal sweep he turned his ass to the man he was supposed to block like he was 10 years younger and Sandusky was approaching him in PSU's locker room. He was the main culprit in the play getting blown up.

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 57853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1283: November 04, 2012, 04:58:25 PM »
The defense got bailed out today by the mere fact that Carolina didn't aggressively attack them. These freaking guys suck ****. Kerrigan was "inactive" again.  :hang:  But let's not limit the blame to the defense. The offense has been awful lately. They've been decent on the ground but they have no passing game to speak of. They have two basic plays they run over and over again. They have the bubble screen that teams don't respect because they don't threaten deep so it's basically a useless play and more so when you run it to Brandon Banks.  :?  And then they have the play option out of the wishbone/pistol/option for a slant 12 yards or so down the middle of the field. There is no intermediate passing attack. Their passing offense looks like a preseason offense. By now teams have seen enough film to at least slow down the threat that Griffin poses. And the coaches don't get let off the hook either. Jr makes baffling playcalls at critical times. Calling a bubble screen 5 yards from the goal line is freaking moronic and especially when you target a 5'6, 150 lbs receiver. And then a sweep on 4th down and goal without any other option when Griffin's TD runs have been successful up the middle! WTF!

I don't see how this team can win another game. They may have a shot at winning in Cleveland but even that's questionable.

Offline Boss Dealwiler

  • Posts: 144
  • Hit the lights.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1284: November 04, 2012, 05:08:44 PM »
I watched most of the game once Brian Urlacher rumbled into the end zone for a pick-6 and all I can say is - I feel sorry for the FORESKINZ players. This is a horrible, horrible team that's not going to win another game this season and is quickly becoming the embarrassment I always knew they could be.

What's going to be hilariously funny is if the FORESKINZ finish with the worst overall record this season (very likely) they'll be giving the Rams the first pick overall. :lmao:

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14526
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1285: November 04, 2012, 05:33:29 PM »
Someone obviously isn't aware of the existence of the Chiefs

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 57853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1286: November 04, 2012, 05:37:20 PM »
Someone obviously isn't aware of the existence of the Chiefs

Ignore MDS when it comes to NFL football. He's already admitted that he doesn't even really follow the NFL. He just enjoys trolling Redskins fans.

Offline Boss Dealwiler

  • Posts: 144
  • Hit the lights.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1287: November 04, 2012, 06:14:17 PM »
Ignore MDS when it comes to NFL football. He's already admitted that he doesn't even really follow the NFL. He just enjoys trolling Redskins fans.

:nono:

I've actually watched more NFL football this year than any year prior. Blame the NFL Redzone in my newfound interest in the "pro" pointy ball.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 16448
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1288: November 04, 2012, 06:18:22 PM »
The lack of talent on this team is mind boggling. Not having first rounders for a few drafts is going to really hurt. I'm also wondering if Kerrigan is just not very good, Jenkins I'll buy he's still recovering, by Kerrigan has shown nothing

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 57853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1289: November 04, 2012, 06:29:11 PM »
The lack of talent on this team is mind boggling. Not having first rounders for a few drafts is going to really hurt. I'm also wondering if Kerrigan is just not very good, Jenkins I'll buy he's still recovering, by Kerrigan has shown nothing

Agreed.

Assuming the Chiefs go 1-15 and the FORESKINZ go 3-13 and no one else loses more than 13 game she Chiefs will have the number 1 and number 2 picks next year.

How will the Chiefs accomplish that feat?

Offline Boss Dealwiler

  • Posts: 144
  • Hit the lights.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1290: November 04, 2012, 06:55:21 PM »
How will the Chiefs accomplish that feat?

Confusion on my part. Still, if the Rams go 3-13 and the Chiefs and FORESKINZ all go 3-13 it's going to funny. At least for me.

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 57853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1291: November 04, 2012, 06:57:28 PM »
Confusion on my part. Still, if the Rams go 3-13 and the Chiefs and FORESKINZ all go 3-13 it's going to funny. At least for me.

It's all good. The Chiefs and Rams are from the same state. The mistake makes total sense from a fan of VT and Oregon.  :poke:

Offline Boss Dealwiler

  • Posts: 144
  • Hit the lights.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1292: November 04, 2012, 07:04:38 PM »
They're also both g-d awful teams so it's easy to get them confused. Regardless, my point stands - no matter how bad the FORESKINZ play from here on out it's not going to help them in the draft.

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 57853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1293: November 04, 2012, 07:16:25 PM »
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Brian Mitchell on FORESKINZ Post-Game Live - "the Redskins are a terrible team with terrible players and terrible playcalling".

I wonder if he'll get fired for dropping obscenities in his rant twice.

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 28899
  • FREE TURNER
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1294: November 04, 2012, 08:28:02 PM »
Quote
#Redskins HC Mike Shanahan throwing the towel on 2012 season. Said that the rest of the 2012 season would become an evaluation for next year

https://twitter.com/NFL_RealUpdates/statuses/265221200152772608

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 57853
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1295: November 04, 2012, 08:31:35 PM »
Yeah he said that in the post game presser. I can't say I blame him to the degree that this team is cooked. They will lose at least 12 games. But who is going to evaluate Mike Shanahan and his son?

Offline Slateman

  • Posts: 28899
  • FREE TURNER
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1296: November 04, 2012, 08:36:30 PM »
Hey at least we'll get a high draft pick








Oh .... wait ..... yea :(

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37225
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1297: November 04, 2012, 08:39:41 PM »
https://twitter.com/NFL_RealUpdates/statuses/265221200152772608

He's an overgrown baby. They very nearly beat the Giants for first place last week.

Online imref

  • Posts: 19135
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1298: November 04, 2012, 10:48:08 PM »
Shanahan is now 14-27 as head coach of the Redskins, at some point there has to be some discussion of firing him, correct?

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 16448
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1299: November 05, 2012, 05:59:34 AM »
Shanahan is now 14-27 as head coach of the Redskins, at some point there has to be some discussion of firing him, correct?


The local media has already told us its Haslett defense that's the problem (just ignore who is in charge of bringing in those players- the fact that hall,  a vinny hold over and one of the worst corners in the NFL,  is still arguably our best corner speaks volumes) and that you need to give a rookie time (because this is still the 1980s and there is no way a rookie could ever lead a team to the playoffs)