Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 32373 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #600: August 26, 2012, 01:55:07 PM »
Redskins Get Extra Down & Still Lose!



Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #601: August 26, 2012, 01:57:02 PM »
Considering most of your post consisted of compiling stats between DC and Cleveland head-to-head, I assumed you were referring to the Redskins last victory. And a cookie would actually be really nice right now.

My post was compiling stats because of Terpsfan's post (if you had scrolled up you would have seen that).

And if you read the post, you'd be able to see that.

Online Vega

  • Posts: 4800
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #602: August 26, 2012, 01:58:17 PM »
The Browns and Redskins both have interesting and potentially bright futures. There. Is everyone happy with that assessment?

Online Clever

  • Posts: 1731
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #603: August 26, 2012, 01:59:03 PM »
 :lol:

Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #604: August 26, 2012, 01:59:27 PM »
Call your expansion team whatever you want,  most of those wins were by a franchise now located in baltimore- speaking of,  how many years until the new incarnation can get out?


A) No Browns team can or will be able to move before 2029.
B) Considering the Browns have much more loyal fans than the Skins do, it's funny you make a comment like that.  And no, that's not just MY personal belief...others say the same...

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/115646-the-10-most-passionate-fan-bases-in-the-nfl

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15500
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #605: August 26, 2012, 02:00:19 PM »
The Browns and Redskins both have interesting and potentially bright futures. There. Is everyone happy with that assessment?

The browns have a potentially bright future- why on earth would you think that?

Online GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12768
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #606: August 26, 2012, 02:01:51 PM »
So if you guys are going to argue with Tribe, could you not quote him? It makes the Ignore feature pointless.

Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #607: August 26, 2012, 02:03:16 PM »
The browns have a potentially bright future- why on earth would you think that?

Much brighter future than the Skins.  RG3 is incredibly overrated.

Online Vega

  • Posts: 4800
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #608: August 26, 2012, 02:03:26 PM »
The browns have a potentially bright future- why on earth would you think that?
Because I'm a Browns fan and I know the team. The defense is young and has several potential stars on it, the offensive line has some nice pieces, they have a high upside running back, and they finally have a QB who MIGHT actually be something. Sure, it could all go totally wrong, but it could also turn out quite well.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 27276
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #609: August 26, 2012, 02:04:48 PM »
So if you guys are going to argue with Tribe, could you not quote him? It makes the Ignore feature pointless.

+1

Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #610: August 26, 2012, 02:06:00 PM »
Because I'm a Browns fan and I know the team. The defense is young and has several potential stars on it, the offensive line has some nice pieces, they have a high upside running back, and they finally have a QB who MIGHT actually be something. Sure, it could all go totally wrong, but it could also turn out quite well.

EXACTLY.

Finally someone else here with common sense

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 25101
  • Home of the $400 blender
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #611: August 26, 2012, 02:07:14 PM »
The Redskins are doomed. Because Snyder.

Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #612: August 26, 2012, 02:09:21 PM »
The Redskins are doomed. Because Snyder.

I used to feel the same way when the Browns had Randy Lerner as owner. But with a new owner, he brings new promise - esp. since he states that he wants the football execs to do their jobs.  Snyder tried to do all the jobs for far too long

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11302
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #613: August 26, 2012, 02:24:36 PM »
And that's something to brag about???  RG3 is not going to be as good as you think.  I'm glad you got him.  I wanted Trent Richardson on the Browns all along.  We didn't need another QB.  I was happy with McCoy.  We got Weeden later - who might I add had very similar stats as RG3 AND beat RG3.

And as far as I remember, you gave up the next 2 years 1st AND 2nd round picks.

Not sure what your point is, but drafting RG3 who is 20/31 (64.5%) 193 yards  2 TD  0 INT in the preseason vs Brandon Weeden who is 25/49  (51%)  297 yards  0TD 1INT  shows any difference considering the Skins have played the Bills, Bears, and Colts in the Pre-Season and the Browns have played the Lions, Packers, and Eagles.  Browns played stiffer competion.  Granted it's only preseason, but you're expected to struggle against good teams.  Your QB struggled against bad teams.

Keep bragging about how you gave up a total of 6 picks to get a guy in RG3.  I'll keep being pleased we didn't give away our future and got a great RB in Trent Richardson.

In the next 2 years we'll be able to focus on improving our right side of our OL and our LB core in the 1st and 2nd round, while you'll be sitting back waiting 'till the 3rd or later rounds.  Have fun with that.

I am not a Redskins fan.

MY team has the best pass rush in the NFL and MY QB is a  two-time Super Bowl MVP

Care to try again?

Online Clever

  • Posts: 1731
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #614: August 26, 2012, 02:34:39 PM »
I am not a Redskins fan.

MY team has the best pass rush in the NFL and MY QB is a  two-time Super Bowl MVP

Care to try again?
None other than the San Diego Chargers!

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11302
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #615: August 26, 2012, 02:38:35 PM »
Tribe, are you really trying to convince the people on this forum or yourself?

Because you are going way out of your way to make the point that RG3 is gonna be the worst QB ever, that Washington sucks and that Cleveland is gods infallible gift to sports.

You come off like a completely uptight douche.

Online UMDNats

  • Posts: 12019
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #616: August 26, 2012, 03:05:26 PM »

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11302
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #617: August 26, 2012, 03:08:55 PM »
Call your expansion team whatever you want,  most of those wins were by a franchise now located in baltimore- speaking of,  how many years until the new incarnation can get out?

Devil's Advocate - can we stop referring to the 1924 Washington Nationals World Series Title as well? that team is in Minnesota.


Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #618: August 26, 2012, 03:12:13 PM »
The last time the Browns were relevant:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recapPlayoff2002?gameId=230105023

(Image removed from quote.)


Please don't ever post a picture of NObama in correlation with the Browns.  I prefer not to have to see a picture of someone who's run this country into the ground and can't responsibility for his awful decisions so he blames them on someone else.

Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #619: August 26, 2012, 03:13:09 PM »
The last time the Browns were relevant:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recapPlayoff2002?gameId=230105023

(Image removed from quote.)


Considering the Browns went 10-6 in 2006, your entire statement is a joke.

Offline Tribe Time

  • Posts: 128
  • Long Live LYNYRD SKYNYRD!!!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #620: August 26, 2012, 03:13:30 PM »
None other than the San Diego Chargers!

NY Giants.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15500
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #621: August 26, 2012, 03:13:51 PM »
Please don't ever post a picture of NObama in correlation with the Browns.  I prefer not to have to see a picture of someone who's run this country into the ground and can't responsibility for his awful decisions so he blames them on someone else.

In fairness Cleveland was starting to rust and people were fleeing long before he became president

Online UMDNats

  • Posts: 12019
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #622: August 26, 2012, 03:14:04 PM »
Please don't ever post a picture of NObama in correlation with the Browns.  I prefer not to have to see a picture of someone who's run this country into the ground and can't responsibility for his awful decisions so he blames them on someone else.



Online Vega

  • Posts: 4800
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #623: August 26, 2012, 03:57:42 PM »
Seriously Tribe Time. Either start acting civil or shut up.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11120
  • babble on
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #624: August 26, 2012, 04:06:59 PM »
Wow.  Fail.

Please don't ever post a picture of NObama in correlation with the Browns.  I prefer not to have to see a picture of someone who's run this country into the ground and can't responsibility for his awful decisions so he blames them on someone else.