Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 32384 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13705
  • You're going to love it, Stan. Trust me.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #350: April 27, 2012, 08:03:28 PM »
Okay, currently being built, my mistake. You don't fix 20 years of mistakes in two seasons.

How long should it take?  I hope the LANDOVER FORESKINZ go 0-16 this season and every FORESKINZ fan sets themselves on fire.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15501
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #351: April 27, 2012, 08:05:31 PM »

With the churn rate of players in the nfl, the team should be improving by now, instead, the supposed coaching guru was a worse winning percentage than zorn

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #352: April 27, 2012, 08:06:19 PM »
With what Shanahan had to do when here? About the amount of time it has now. This year is the last of the rebuild, or at least should be. Next year is when the depth pieces start to come in and the team really starts to get moving.

Gibbs fixed a fair amount when he was here, but naturally after he left, Cerrato took control again and ruined everything.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13705
  • You're going to love it, Stan. Trust me.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #353: April 27, 2012, 08:07:47 PM »
:pray:

I hope they, at best, win no more than four games this year. 

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15501
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #354: April 27, 2012, 08:10:51 PM »
He still has worse winning percentages than his predecessors- most people call that regression

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #355: April 27, 2012, 08:15:37 PM »
You all post a lot in the Capitals thread, so if you've been watching that team as long as you claim, you should know how long a rebuild takes. This isn't basketball where one player can turn you into a winner. Granted, RGIII is going to be a BIG addition assuming he pans out.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15501
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #356: April 27, 2012, 08:20:40 PM »
In the nfl- a rebuild should be bearing fruit by now- this isn't hockey with a minor league system.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #357: April 27, 2012, 08:24:20 PM »
True, but it's not like the Redskins only had a couple areas to fill. they built from the bottom up. Lines, linebackers, tight ends, running backs, wr's, etc, etc, etc. You can't do that all in one season nor two. The Redskins basically did everything backward, instead of going QB forward, QB was last to put in.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15501
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #358: April 27, 2012, 08:30:03 PM »
They did qb in year 1- he flopped and they lost draft picks in the process

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #359: April 27, 2012, 09:15:12 PM »
True, but it's not like the Redskins only had a couple areas to fill. they built from the bottom up. Lines, linebackers, tight ends, running backs, wr's, etc, etc, etc. You can't do that all in one season nor two. The Redskins basically did everything backward, instead of going QB forward, QB was last to put in.

What are your inside sources telling you Boost?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54556
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #360: April 27, 2012, 09:30:50 PM »
Redskins traded their 3rd rounder to Buffalo essentially moving down two spots and picking up an extra 7th.

Buffalo scooped up a speed WR from NC St. Seems like a reach at that slot.


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54556
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #361: April 27, 2012, 09:39:27 PM »
Skins select Josh Leribeus, G, SMU, 6'3", 312.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #362: April 27, 2012, 09:47:11 PM »
Skins select Josh Leribeus, G, SMU, 6'3", 312.

I think we could have gotten him in the 4th. Brandon Brooks probably would have been the better guard to get there.

Not a terrible pick, though.

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #363: April 27, 2012, 09:48:26 PM »
Damn it, every time I see one of your posts I think it's SF and I get confused. 

LOL! What's up with your avatar? I see your posts and I think its Baseball is Life. When did you become a sun shiner?

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #364: April 27, 2012, 09:50:05 PM »
LOL! What's up with your avatar? I see your posts and I think its Baseball is Life. When did you become a sun shiner?

It's Linty's originally since he lost a bet with BiL. Not sure why MDS is doing it though. Funny stuff though :lol:

At least they picked an OG and not some other random position.

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #365: April 27, 2012, 09:52:53 PM »
They did qb in year 1- he flopped and they lost draft picks in the process

No denying Shanahan made a mistake, but the thing is, he told McNabb what he did wrong in Philly and that he could work with him, he agreed and did the complete opposite when he came here. Continued to not listen and the rest of that crap. So Shanny took his word and McNabb flopped. At least he got rid of him right?

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #366: April 27, 2012, 09:53:07 PM »
Is that Russell Wilson's mom or girlfriend

Offline InsaneBoost

  • Posts: 1479
  • Censored
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #367: April 27, 2012, 09:53:11 PM »
What are your inside sources telling you Boost?

What do you want to know?

Offline BerkeleyNat

  • Posts: 5026
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #368: April 27, 2012, 09:59:10 PM »
It's Linty's originally since he lost a bet with BiL. Not sure why MDS is doing it though. Funny stuff though :lol:

At least they picked an OG and not some other random position.

Damn...lots of avatar changes around here.  :lol:

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 27277
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #369: April 27, 2012, 10:01:21 PM »
Damn...lots of avatar changes around here.  :lol:

I think MDS is in his solidarity mode.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54556
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #370: April 27, 2012, 10:03:26 PM »
Brandon Brooks went to Houston.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54556
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #371: April 27, 2012, 10:05:53 PM »
Is that Russell Wilson's mom or girlfriend

If you can't tell that's probably a bad thing.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #372: April 27, 2012, 10:10:03 PM »
I don't know if the Skins need a CB, but if they do, they should trade up right now to get Alfonzo Dennard.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54556
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #373: April 27, 2012, 10:10:52 PM »
They absolutely need a CB. I'd like for them to sever ties with Hall.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54556
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #374: April 27, 2012, 10:13:04 PM »
What was he projected as before the arrest?