Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 33378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37221
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2075: January 05, 2013, 08:29:50 AM »
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000122125/article/christian-ponder-questionable-for-minnesota-vikings

Ponder questionable. Vikings need to win two for skins to get another home game.

Offline thepointe01

  • Posts: 4116
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2076: January 05, 2013, 07:24:49 PM »
Ponder is indeed out. Joe Webb starting, biggest mismatch in nfl history for the playoffs?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56582
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2077: January 05, 2013, 07:58:11 PM »
Ponder is indeed out. Joe Webb starting, biggest mismatch in nfl history for the playoffs?


They may be better off without Ponder.  :lmao:  I don't see how this can be considered so much more of a mismatch because he's out. These were mismatches though.




Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 16188
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2078: January 05, 2013, 08:25:40 PM »
No miners chargers super bowl pics?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56582
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2079: January 05, 2013, 08:27:29 PM »
No miners chargers super bowl pics?

Look again.

Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11477
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2080: January 05, 2013, 08:30:44 PM »
Tshirt available at my Giant.

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 16188
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2081: January 05, 2013, 08:33:55 PM »
I didn't recognize the white pants- that was an ass kicking

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 56582
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2082: January 05, 2013, 08:39:33 PM »
I didn't recognize the white pants- that was an ass kicking

That was the year the NFL wore throwbacks for the NFL's 75th anniversary and the 49ers decided to continue to wear theirs for the rest of the season. I loved the ones Washington wore that season.

Online madj55

  • Posts: 5833
  • #curlydub
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2083: January 06, 2013, 01:20:30 AM »
Just got tickets to the game, figured I was at the Nats game 4 I might as well go see my first Redskins playoff game.

Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11477
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!

Offline Copecwby20

  • Posts: 1581
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2085: January 06, 2013, 10:58:13 AM »
I'm so going to  that game if they win today. Wells Fargo Luxury Suite!  :woop: :panic: :woop: :money: :money:


Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2087: January 06, 2013, 11:57:32 AM »
i wonder what tribe time has to say about the redskins being in the playoffs and the browns not?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 43997
  • And then there were six...
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2088: January 06, 2013, 12:24:24 PM »
Why is James Andrews discussing the status of one of his patients with a reporter?  I guess if you're renowned enough doctor-patient confidentiality doesn't apply to you.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14514
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2089: January 06, 2013, 12:55:47 PM »
That was the year the NFL wore throwbacks for the NFL's 75th anniversary and the 49ers decided to continue to wear theirs for the rest of the season. I loved the ones Washington wore that season.

The uniforms must have been the only good thing about that season for the Redskins. :spaz:

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 17437
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2090: January 06, 2013, 03:42:33 PM »
Rex Grossman is inactive.

Online MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 14067
  • You have the right to remain swolen.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2091: January 06, 2013, 04:21:39 PM »
I still get my game check!

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 27851
  • FREE TURNER
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2092: January 06, 2013, 04:35:23 PM »
Seahawks 34
Redskins 17


But Kerrigan destroys Wilson's knee, forcing the Seahawks to play Flynn, who leads them to a Super Bowl.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 31834
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2093: January 06, 2013, 04:52:06 PM »
Why is James Andrews discussing the status of one of his patients with a reporter?  I guess if you're renowned enough doctor-patient confidentiality doesn't apply to you.

I thought the same thing.   HIPAA is a pretty stern test for insurance folks and/or providers.   Hell, I can't even access my son's records because he's over 18  ...  and he's on my insurance.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 27851
  • FREE TURNER
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2094: January 06, 2013, 04:52:26 PM »
TOUCHDOWN REDSKINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 31834
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2095: January 06, 2013, 04:53:32 PM »
TOUCHDOWN REDSKINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

'bout time.   :)

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 18830
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2096: January 06, 2013, 04:56:49 PM »
Seattle Seahawks          0
Washington Redskins   7


1st Quarter TD 10:15   
Evan Royster 4 Yard Pass From Robert Griffin (Kai Forbath Kick is Good)
Drive info: 9 plays, 80 yds, 5:03



Online MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 14067
  • You have the right to remain swolen.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2097: January 06, 2013, 04:58:51 PM »
FORESKINZ need to hurry up and start losing this game.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 17437
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2098: January 06, 2013, 05:02:48 PM »
FORESKINZ need to hurry up and start losing this game.

Rex being inactive isn't going to help

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 31834
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #2099: January 06, 2013, 05:04:20 PM »
Rex being inactive isn't going to help

I suppose that's why "Rex/MDS" is on this thread.