Author Topic: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)  (Read 41928 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 43320
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1175: October 22, 2012, 07:01:00 PM »
He's a steelers fan. Not everyone has split loyalties.

:shock:



I had Nats' fever.   That's the only reason I would have missed the games so far.   :P      I read so much about the Steelers' being old, etc. that I was pleasantly surprised (especially in the 2nd half) with the Steelers last night* and RGIII should have won that game yesterday.   Defense let 'im down.


*   Got to watch the game at a bar in Western PA.   

Offline CALSGR8

  • Posts: 11545
  • BE LOUD. BE PROUD. BE POSITIVE!
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1176: October 22, 2012, 09:20:52 PM »
Actually the Steelers and Skins are both celebrating 80 years in football!

Oh!  And welcome back!

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1177: October 22, 2012, 09:24:08 PM »
Not really sure what Cooley brings to the table. He hasn't been working out and he didn't look that effective in training camp and pre-season.

Still, anything's better than Niles Paul.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 62409
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1178: October 23, 2012, 10:53:29 AM »
This is actually the Redskins' 81st NFL season. The Eagles and Steelers were founded in 1933 so this would be those respective team's 80th season unless you count the 1943 season as half since the two teams merged during the war due to lack of players on the roster and played that season as the Steagles.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 18566
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1179: October 23, 2012, 10:59:27 AM »
Big game this week.  I have lunch riding on this one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 62409
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1180: October 23, 2012, 11:03:58 AM »
Big game this week.  I have lunch riding on this one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I hope you settled on a place that isn't too expensive.  :lol:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 62409
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1181: October 23, 2012, 06:46:14 PM »
Ryan Grant released.

Offline Bloo

  • Posts: 2054
  • We win. We lose. We win again.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1182: October 27, 2012, 10:30:11 PM »
...Chris Cooley apparently wanted to have beer in part of the negotiations of his contract. Freaking Awesome! The Redskins need a party animal in the group to keep things interesting.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 62409
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1183: October 28, 2012, 12:36:57 PM »
Fletcher active. I hope this isn't about extending the consecutive game streak.

wussy Galore out again and I doubt she even plays again this season. She's already paid so she's taking it easy lest she hurts herself running around in those high heeled pumps.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1184: October 28, 2012, 01:04:15 PM »
What is that garbage the Steelers are wearing?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1185: October 28, 2012, 01:11:49 PM »
Well that didn't take long.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 17970
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1186: October 28, 2012, 01:17:17 PM »
Haslett is awful,  any play requiring our defense to adjust works

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1187: October 28, 2012, 01:21:47 PM »
Game

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1188: October 28, 2012, 01:39:59 PM »
The talent level around Griffin is appallingly low. 

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1189: October 28, 2012, 01:40:39 PM »
TOUCHDOWN REDSKINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 17970
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1190: October 28, 2012, 01:42:06 PM »
How is Danny Smith still employed?

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1191: October 28, 2012, 01:55:57 PM »
How is Danny Smith still employed?

I assume that he and Jim Hasslett are Dan Snyders gay lovers

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1192: October 28, 2012, 02:01:30 PM »
And Griffin get's an offensive pass interference call

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23260
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1193: October 28, 2012, 02:04:15 PM »
And Griffin get's an offensive pass interference call

Not a good 3rd down play. Perfect for 2nd down.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23260
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1194: October 28, 2012, 02:05:41 PM »
Defense is getting roughed up.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1195: October 28, 2012, 02:12:49 PM »
Not a good 3rd down play. Perfect for 2nd down.

It's whatever. They should just play all the rookies and use the season as an extended pre-season.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 43320
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1196: October 28, 2012, 02:13:50 PM »
What is that garbage the Steelers are wearing?

Wife said if they had wings, they could be bumble bees.

Online Slateman

  • Posts: 36448
  • BELIEVE
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1197: October 28, 2012, 02:19:31 PM »
Wish we had Garcon ...

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 43320
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1198: October 28, 2012, 02:34:49 PM »
Wish we had Garcon ...

...  or somebody who could catch.   Goodness, Shannie's gonna get RGIII killed with those calls.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 34961
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Washington Redskins Thread (2012)
« Reply #1199: October 28, 2012, 02:38:08 PM »
What in the hell are the Steelers wearing?