Author Topic: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)  (Read 24062 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 17867
  • #freeclarkson
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #75: February 04, 2012, 08:26:40 PM »
i'll miss him sprinting in from the pen more than anything else


i'll miss this:


Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #76: February 04, 2012, 09:34:34 PM »
i'll miss this:

(Image removed from quote.)




looks like a Looney Tunes character

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 9993
    • Twitter
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #77: February 05, 2012, 08:01:35 AM »
i'll miss this:

(Image removed from quote.)


Beyond the sizing issues, that is one ugly uniform, wonder how many of those they sold.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 17867
  • #freeclarkson
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #78: February 06, 2012, 01:24:23 PM »
Alex Cora to STL.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13700
  • You're going to love it, Stan. Trust me.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #79: February 06, 2012, 01:59:09 PM »
Alex Cora to STL.

That's really too bad.  I know I joked about him calling him "Joey" but that guy is a really solid guy that's going to be a great manager some day.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 4800
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #80: February 08, 2012, 05:23:24 PM »
Baltimore is working on signing Nick Johnson to a minor league deal.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 18491
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #81: February 08, 2012, 05:40:14 PM »
It is taking a while because they asked him to write down his medical history.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15486
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #82: February 08, 2012, 07:52:30 PM »
It is taking a while because they asked him to write down his medical history.

I can imagine all the player's charts neatly in file cabinets with his sitting off to the side in a banker's box

Offline imref

  • Posts: 17867
  • #freeclarkson
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #83: February 08, 2012, 07:55:17 PM »
It is taking a while because they asked him to write down his medical history.

I'd like to see him work his way back into the league, he could be a lot better Matt Stairs than Matt Stairs was last year.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 16540
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #84: February 08, 2012, 08:03:03 PM »
It is taking a while because they asked him to write down his medical history.

Speaking of which, Rich Harden is out for 2012.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86616
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #85: February 21, 2012, 01:44:42 PM »
Quote
The Indians will sign infielder Cristian Guzman to a minor league contract with a spring training invite, tweets MLB.com's Jordan Bastian.  He took his physical today and the deal will likely become official tomorrow.

Guzman, 33, last played in the Majors in 2010 with the Nationals and Rangers.  He sat out the 2011 season due to family issues.  Guzman is a career .271/.307/.383 hitter who has appeared at both middle infield positions.

:lmao: Acta

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14380
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #86: February 21, 2012, 02:11:18 PM »
Quick, where are Mike Bacsik and Chris Snelling?

Offline BrandonK

  • Posts: 482
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #87: February 28, 2012, 02:53:12 AM »
Quick, where are Mike Bacsik and Chris Snelling?

Bacsik is going to UT-Arlington down here in TX. Not sure what his plan is, but he's not pitching anymore.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #88: February 28, 2012, 06:29:03 AM »
Bacsik is going to UT-Arlington down here in TX. Not sure what his plan is, but he's not pitching anymore.



His plan is to be a bald racist 40 year old college student

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 28309
  • Hell yes!
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #89: February 28, 2012, 08:13:10 AM »
Bacsik is going to UT-Arlington down here in TX. Not sure what his plan is, but he's not pitching anymore.

Living off his signature.

Offline Vega

  • Posts: 4800
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #90: March 02, 2012, 07:14:08 PM »
Boston signed Garrett Mock. I thought he already signed somewhere though?

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #91: March 02, 2012, 07:27:28 PM »
Boston signed Garrett Mock. I thought he already signed somewhere though?

According to the transaction section on BR, he was signed by Toronto on December 1st and then released by them on February 17th.  Maybe a failed physical?  Or maybe they weren't impressed by his bullpen session.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13700
  • You're going to love it, Stan. Trust me.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #92: March 02, 2012, 07:31:05 PM »
According to the transaction section on BR, he was signed by Toronto on December 1st and then released by them on February 17th.  Maybe a failed physical?  Or maybe they weren't impressed by his bullpen session.

It was too cold there.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #93: March 02, 2012, 07:38:17 PM »
It was too cold there.



It was too Canadian.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10706
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #94: March 02, 2012, 07:44:40 PM »


It was too Canadian.

They probably expected him to not suck at pitching.

Online blue911

  • Posts: 17057
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #95: March 02, 2012, 07:51:32 PM »
They probably expected him to not suck at pitching.

Boston has Lackey, so sucking isn't a problem

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 18491
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #96: March 02, 2012, 08:26:02 PM »
Boston has Lackey, so sucking isn't a problem

Yes, but he is out for the year and Dice-K isn't due back until the All Star break.  They need some back up stink in case Scott Atchison does not stink. 

This is the kind of depth at stink big money can buy.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30110
    • http://www.wnff.net

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86616
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #98: March 05, 2012, 09:42:17 PM »
Pea**** got roughed up today vs Anaheim: 1.2 IP 4 H 4 ER 1 BB 1 K. Pujols crushed a double off him

Offline imref

  • Posts: 17867
  • #freeclarkson
Re: The "Former Nat Watch" Thread (2012)
« Reply #99: March 05, 2012, 10:58:37 PM »
Pea**** got roughed up today vs Anaheim: 1.2 IP 4 H 4 ER 1 BB 1 K. Pujols crushed a double off him

that's a tough lineup for anyone to face, even in spring training.