Author Topic: Define Natitude  (Read 46101 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30001
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Define Natitude
« Reply #325: December 22, 2011, 07:31:49 AM »
No one has addressed the logical flaw that the MASN money hasn't changed yet and isn't guaranteed to do so. Or the fact that they could sign Prince and Cespedes.
Boswell BASES his whole piece on the MASN money, which is a logical flaw. It's a poor piece because he focused on emotion and not on the fact that the MASN money is actually irrelevant to the low payroll.
You admitted the logical flaw. It's a poor piece.
Are you really that stupid? In his zeal to go off on a rant, the logical foundation of the piece is missing. It was bad journalism. The subject of the article is irrelevant to that statement.

This isn't a high school debate.  You can't "win" on a technicality.  Whether the increased TV money is coming or not is completely irrelevant to the general point of the piece, which is that the Lerners need to stop micromanaging payroll and trust their execs.  The fact that you keep harping on the "logical flaw" of putting the cart before the horse while dropping turds like this...

Quote
Or the fact that they could sign Prince and Cespedes.
You mean like, Gio Gonzalez? Aren't they getting Gio Gonzalez?

...deserves some kind of award.  Increased TV money is practically a forgone conclusion compared to this stuff, but even if it doesn't happen, it doesn't magically invalidate everything said in the piece.

Are you really that stupid?

:spit: :lmao: