Author Topic: StanK in on Dodgers bid  (Read 3558 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 9863
    • Twitter
StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Topic Start: December 02, 2011, 01:41:00 PM »
Looks like he is joining a group with Magic Johnson with the Plan to assume the same role as he had with the Nats.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14601
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #1: December 02, 2011, 01:57:43 PM »
to assume the same role as he had with the Nats.

lead weight?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #2: December 02, 2011, 01:58:37 PM »
crap shoveling and Philly pandering?

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 9863
    • Twitter
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #3: December 02, 2011, 02:01:58 PM »

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 17180
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #4: December 02, 2011, 02:03:39 PM »
he's already working up the invites for Giant and Diamondback fans.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13458
  • Magic City is the place for me.
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #5: December 02, 2011, 02:05:02 PM »
Will he give Tony Gwynn the key to Dodgertown?!?!!?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 16663
  • Like my arm slot?
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #6: December 02, 2011, 10:16:26 PM »
he's already working up the invites for Giant and Diamondback fans.

if he buys the dodgers then that high speed rail line to SFO gets built.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16334
  • GOOOOOOOOOOD MORNIN' VIETNAM!
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #7: December 03, 2011, 09:36:38 AM »
Nats Enquirer's FB status this morning was StanK already lining up Phillies bus tours for Dodgers Stadium.  :lmao:

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 9863
    • Twitter
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #8: December 06, 2011, 07:13:05 AM »
According to Cots StanK is fooling around with the Dodgers while still officially our team President.  Is that Polygamy?


http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/2005/01/washington-nationals_01.html

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #9: December 06, 2011, 07:03:18 PM »
I don't think he's been the President of the Nats for a while.

Didn't they give his job to Fluffer the walking talking yes man?

Offline PowerBoater69

  • Posts: 9863
    • Twitter
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #10: December 06, 2011, 07:09:48 PM »
I don't think he's been the President of the Nats for a while.

Didn't they give his job to Fluffer the walking talking yes man?
 

He quit the position, it's unusual that Cots has this wrong as they are on top of the status for each all of our players.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 17180
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #11: December 07, 2011, 08:47:18 AM »
He was on MLB Hot Stove last night and praised the Marlins for opening their stadium the right way by spending money to put on an interesting, contending team.  He said that once you get someone to buy season tickets, they usually stay 3 - 4 years, so if you pump up attendance when you open your stadium and sell a lot of season tickets, it can pay for much of the contract of your FAs.

I was in shock.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 10890
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #12: December 07, 2011, 08:53:21 AM »
Two nights ago he was stressing that the Mets have to communicate their plan with the fans. Not sure which teams' fans he was referring to.

What an assclown.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27568
  • Hell yes!
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #13: December 07, 2011, 08:59:32 AM »
He was on MLB Hot Stove last night and praised the Marlins for opening their stadium the right way by spending money to put on an interesting, contending team.  He said that once you get someone to buy season tickets, they usually stay 3 - 4 years, so if you pump up attendance when you open your stadium and sell a lot of season tickets, it can pay for much of the contract of your FAs.

I was in shock.

This is really going to piss off Panatsfan.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13458
  • Magic City is the place for me.
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #14: December 07, 2011, 09:33:48 AM »
This is really going to piss off Panatsfan.

Can't wait.  :popcorn:

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 14601
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #15: December 07, 2011, 03:28:48 PM »
 

He quit the position, it's unusual that Cots has this wrong as they are on top of the status for each all of our players.


Maybe, they just leave it up until he gets replaced?


Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 17509
  • I'd like to buy a clutch hit, Pat
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #16: March 27, 2012, 11:45:06 PM »
from MLB Network Radio just now: "According to sources, the Dodgers will be sold to the ownership group led by Magic Johnson and Stan Kasten."  Giants fans can expect their invitation to Dodger Stadium any day now...

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #17: March 27, 2012, 11:49:06 PM »
:PALernersFan bat signal: :popcorn:

8)

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33586
  • Lets go to work
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #18: March 28, 2012, 08:13:14 AM »
Bought it for two BILLION dollars.

McCourt makes out like a bandit.

Five times as much what he paid for it. Makes me sick.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 10890
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #19: March 28, 2012, 08:14:08 AM »
Karma doesn't exist.

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 16239
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #20: March 28, 2012, 08:17:02 AM »
Bought it for two BILLION dollars.

McCourt makes out like a bandit.

Five times as much what he paid for it. Makes me sick.

That's without the parking lots, which are another $300M.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 17180
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #21: March 28, 2012, 08:18:26 AM »
Have they been able to set aside some of the conveyances of dodger assets into the financing shells McCourt set up?  $2B for the package McCourt bought originally miight be reasonable, but $2B stripped of the parking, tickets, and TV revenuws and stripped of the real estate would seem crazy.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 24731
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #22: March 28, 2012, 08:19:53 AM »
crap shoveling and Philly pandering?

"Hey Magic !    How are we gonna get all those fans in Philly to Dodger Stadium?"


Offline blue911

  • Posts: 16239
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #23: March 28, 2012, 08:20:06 AM »
Have they been able to set aside some of the conveyances of dodger assets into the financing shells McCourt set up?  $2B for the package McCourt bought originally miight be reasonable, but $2B stripped of the parking, tickets, and TV revenuws and stripped of the real estate would seem crazy.

The TV Revenue is part of the package, that's already been decided by the bankruptcy judge.

Offline JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 17180
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: StanK in on Dodgers bid
« Reply #24: March 28, 2012, 08:25:07 AM »
Blue - makes sense. When I said conveyances, I was specificaly thinking of fraudulent conveyances that a bankruptcy judge can set aside, but I'm not really a bankruptcy jock anymore and am not up on that area of the law. 

If you ask the Court of Appreals for the 5th Circuit, they might not think I'm up on the area of law I do practice in.