Author Topic: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2  (Read 1853 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 10405
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #275: August 27, 2011, 08:33:29 PM »
Another good thing about DirecTV is that we have an HD feed right now (I gather that Comcast is down in this area).

That's the only good thing about DirecTV.

Cox blows wang. Huh? :shrug:

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #276: August 27, 2011, 08:33:37 PM »
That makes hammonds .500 this week.

First round is on him at Sliders!

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12363
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #277: August 27, 2011, 08:33:39 PM »
Then you suck lately.
I am Davey Johnson.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10559
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #278: August 27, 2011, 08:33:49 PM »
Oh, you're talking about Harry Potter.  I had no idea.  You could have been talking about the Lord of the Rings and I wouldn't have known.
You are no longer my internet bff.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #279: August 27, 2011, 08:34:01 PM »
The Os won their fifth in a row yesterday. Ugh.

And are still 10 games behind us.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #280: August 27, 2011, 08:34:56 PM »
Oh, you're talking about Harry Potter.  I had no idea.  You could have been talking about the Lord of the Rings and I wouldn't have known.



Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #281: August 27, 2011, 08:35:03 PM »
And are still 10 games behind us.

We're both still, to quote that great American sage GG Allin, going to be last in line at the gang bang.

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4044
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #282: August 27, 2011, 08:35:07 PM »
Quote
the movie Secretariat.



The one with Maggie Gyllenhaal?  Hot.



Gyllenhaal wasn't in Secretariat.    Diane Lane . . .


Offline Bloo

  • Posts: 1562
  • Goin' down fightin'
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #283: August 27, 2011, 08:35:30 PM »
CHEESE ISN'T REALLY MAC'S IMAGINARY FRIEND!
Oh well. I didn't like how he wanted bunnies on the go-cart. I wanted flames  :evil:

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17490
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #284: August 27, 2011, 08:35:48 PM »
  

Great assist from LF!

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15498
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #285: August 27, 2011, 08:35:58 PM »
Another good thing about DirecTV is that we have an HD feed right now (I gather that Comcast is down in this area).

wow. :rofl: That sucks. I'm glad its still up here. Losing TV is almost as bad as losing internet.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #286: August 27, 2011, 08:35:58 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)


Oh, so it's a Star Trek thing, explains why I don't know crap about it. 

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8384
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #287: August 27, 2011, 08:36:32 PM »
Which part? :lol:

It has been well publicized that Rowling wrote Dumbledore as a gay character, she said so herself.

The other part was just a riff on PA.

I did not know this, when I looked it up, I got this:

"It's very disappointing that the author would have to make one of the characters gay," said Roberta Combs, president of the Christian Coalition of America, "It's not a good example for our children, who really like the books and the movies. It encourages homosexuality."

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #288: August 27, 2011, 08:36:50 PM »
Another good thing about DirecTV is that we have an HD feed right now (I gather that Comcast is down in this area).


I've still got HD :shrug:

Oh, so it's a Star Trek thing, explains why I don't know crap about it. 

:lmao:

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #289: August 27, 2011, 08:37:03 PM »
"It encourages homosexuality."

That guy should really go eat a bullet.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #290: August 27, 2011, 08:37:32 PM »
I did not know this, when I looked it up, I got this:

"It's very disappointing that the author would have to make one of the characters gay," said Roberta Combs, president of the Christian Coalition of America, "It's not a good example for our children, who really like the books and the movies. It encourages homosexuality."

I thought the Christians hated HP anyway because of the witchcraft and whatnot?

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #291: August 27, 2011, 08:38:08 PM »
I thought the Christians hated HP anyway because of the witchcraft and whatnot?

Probably explains why they gave up making crappy PCs...

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15498
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #292: August 27, 2011, 08:38:22 PM »
I thought the Christians hated HP anyway because of the witchcraft and whatnot?

They hate it because the daywalker gets with the hot jailbait.

Well thats why I hate it.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 29998
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #293: August 27, 2011, 08:38:33 PM »
Probably explains why they gave up making crappy PCs...

:doh: :lol:

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10559
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #294: August 27, 2011, 08:39:23 PM »
Oh well. I didn't like how he wanted bunnies on the go-cart. I wanted flames  :evil:
BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEE EEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!


Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13456
  • Bring on the ribs.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #295: August 27, 2011, 08:39:24 PM »
Can we get back to talking about this crappy game and how Stephen Strasbeeeeeeerg doesn't have a good fastball anymore?

Offline Bloo

  • Posts: 1562
  • Goin' down fightin'
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #296: August 27, 2011, 08:40:43 PM »
I want flames!!!!

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17490
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #297: August 27, 2011, 08:40:49 PM »
Desmond must have tattooed "F.P." on his ankle...


Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10559
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #298: August 27, 2011, 08:41:08 PM »
Oh, so it's a Star Trek thing, explains why I don't know crap about it. 
Now you're definitely not my internet bff  :evil:

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8384
Re: Nationals @ Reds, Game 2
« Reply #299: August 27, 2011, 08:41:50 PM »
That guy should really go eat a bullet.

Yup basically. That statement is wrong on so many levels.