Author Topic: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2  (Read 5307 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87169
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #925: June 29, 2011, 01:23:57 AM »
I'm back to reality. That streak had me thinking playoffs were a possibility. :lol:
I was hoping we'd take 2 of 3 in this series and then kick some ass back at home.

Looking like we will be on the wrong side of a sweep after tomorrow and good bye to .500.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41709
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #926: June 29, 2011, 01:24:35 AM »
It would be nice is Nix was still available.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5960
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #927: June 29, 2011, 01:24:46 AM »
Amen. Oh well I officially think this game is over and I usually don't throw in the towel until the last out. But this game just doesn't feel like it's gonna go our way. And really hasn't since the Morse DP in the very first inning.

You cursed us!

But really, JZ should put us in good shape tomorrow to take one.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87169
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #928: June 29, 2011, 01:25:06 AM »
Awful, BP fastball.

This series has been excruciating. And the definition of pathetic pitching.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #929: June 29, 2011, 01:25:14 AM »
You guys don't think JZ is in for regression too?

Offline ghostface

  • Posts: 1123
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #930: June 29, 2011, 01:25:19 AM »
Balester like

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11177
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #931: June 29, 2011, 01:25:22 AM »
Well that's pretty much it.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87169
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #932: June 29, 2011, 01:26:03 AM »
7.1 IP 14 H 9 R 8 ER 5 BB 7 K for the pitching staff tonight. Pretty awesome

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5960
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #933: June 29, 2011, 01:26:40 AM »
K, not going to waste my energy. Good night guys.

Offline Kentucky_National

  • Posts: 4607
  • BANG ZOOM
    • My Twitter
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #934: June 29, 2011, 01:26:46 AM »
If we can win tomorrow, it would still be a 3-3 roadtrip which isn't bad at all. Most good teams tend to go .500 on the road, and then take care of business at home.

However, this game is officially over. Kind of an ass whooping now.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #935: June 29, 2011, 01:26:57 AM »
This'll wreak havoc on our run differential.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41709
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #936: June 29, 2011, 01:27:04 AM »
This isn't regression.  They're not this bad.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87169
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #937: June 29, 2011, 01:27:05 AM »
Mattheus showing that he belongs in AAA like Balester.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5960
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #938: June 29, 2011, 01:27:06 AM »
You guys don't think JZ is in for regression too?

Let me dream! :(

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #939: June 29, 2011, 01:27:44 AM »
This isn't regression.  They're not this bad.
Regression happens like this: a reliever is just as likely to have a really good streak as he is an equally bad one.  Over time, these streaks average out.  This is absolutely regression.

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87169
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #940: June 29, 2011, 01:27:48 AM »
I thought Mattheus was unavailable tonight?

Davey Johnson continues to baffle

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87169
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #941: June 29, 2011, 01:28:41 AM »
Hell, even if we had scored all the runs we should have scored we'd still be losing.

Just an embarrassing pitching performance. Getting behind batters all night and then giving in with bad pitches.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41709
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #942: June 29, 2011, 01:29:13 AM »
Regression happens like this: a reliever is just as likely to have a really good streak as he is an equally bad one.  Over time, these streaks average out.  This is absolutely regression.

You could also lower your average.  This isn't like a series of coin flips.

Offline BBQ

  • Posts: 1973
  • Not Werth it.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #943: June 29, 2011, 01:29:37 AM »
Did anyone else just start laughing at Desmond?

Offline Kentucky_National

  • Posts: 4607
  • BANG ZOOM
    • My Twitter
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #944: June 29, 2011, 01:29:45 AM »
Seriously I don't give a freak about the field. Get Desmond the freak out this damn game. You're a major leaguer you don't make this many damn errors you piece of crap. Bench his ass.

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 11177
  • babble on
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #945: June 29, 2011, 01:29:48 AM »
That was just downright ridiculous.

Blargh

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 87169
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #946: June 29, 2011, 01:29:49 AM »
5th error :lmao:

freak the field, Desmond bobbled the ball after fielding it

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #947: June 29, 2011, 01:30:11 AM »
You could also lower your average.  This isn't like a series of coin flips.
It kinda is...

Offline ghostface

  • Posts: 1123
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #948: June 29, 2011, 01:31:08 AM »
FP needs to STFU about the field conditions. 

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5960
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Angels, Game 2
« Reply #949: June 29, 2011, 01:31:54 AM »
It kinda is...

As factual as your thinking is, I just don't like it. Simplifying the way we all think with mathematical facts is just sort of.. disheartening?