Author Topic: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2  (Read 16848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #125: May 31, 2011, 07:36:13 PM »
Pudge should not be allowed to swing

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #126: May 31, 2011, 07:36:24 PM »
it doesn't matter, pudge.  jerry is awful with a man on 3rd and less than two outs.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35130
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #127: May 31, 2011, 07:37:23 PM »
I completely forgot Pudge was batting... and here I was thinking we'd avoid the DP.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #128: May 31, 2011, 07:37:33 PM »
it doesn't matter, pudge.  jerry is awful with a man on 3rd and less than two outs.

that random stat doesnt matter

Online RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31433
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #129: May 31, 2011, 07:37:38 PM »

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #130: May 31, 2011, 07:37:43 PM »
it doesn't matter, pudge.  jerry is awful with a man on 3rd and less than two outs.

yes because his performance is significantly altered by something not only out of his control but completely independent of the at-bat itself.

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 10139
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #131: May 31, 2011, 07:38:12 PM »
I completely forgot Pudge was batting... and here I was thinking we'd avoid the DP.
That DP is why Hairston should be hitting in front of Pudge

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #132: May 31, 2011, 07:38:14 PM »
that random stat doesnt matter

^this in a less sarcastic way than my post above.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #133: May 31, 2011, 07:38:53 PM »
Just seeing Jerry Hairston's ugly mug makes me want to punch him in the face.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #134: May 31, 2011, 07:38:55 PM »
Girl picking her nose behind the batting screen > Pudge

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #135: May 31, 2011, 07:38:55 PM »
yes because his performance is significantly altered by something not only out of his control but completely independent of the at-bat itself.

i'm just saying hairston has been awful with runner on 3rd go look it up. 

and if you think i was really sticking up for pudge there, you need to get yourself checked.

Online RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 31433
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #136: May 31, 2011, 07:39:16 PM »
that inning will cost us the game I'm sure.

Offline Frau Mau

  • Posts: 1121
  • Good boy!
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #137: May 31, 2011, 07:39:21 PM »
Cue SF freakout...3..2..1....

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 15101
  • Captain Sadness
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #138: May 31, 2011, 07:39:34 PM »
Just think, Bixler starts off the next inning.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #139: May 31, 2011, 07:39:43 PM »
that random stat doesnt matter

how is it random if it happens a lot and he fails?

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #140: May 31, 2011, 07:39:52 PM »
yes because his performance is significantly altered by something not only out of his control but completely independent of the at-bat itself.

Man on 3rd with 2 outs, I'd agree.  Man on 3rd with less than 2 outs, I disagree.  You're going to pitch differently if a reasonably deep fly brings in a run, unless perhaps you have a ridiculous lead.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 93631
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #141: May 31, 2011, 07:40:06 PM »
God, it's like the more runners we get on the bases the worse the results are.

Lately every time we get multiple runners on and no outs we don't score any. :? Let alone not getting many big innings, but many times we don't even get 1 run which is killer as all these games have usually gone down to 1 run.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #142: May 31, 2011, 07:40:26 PM »
Man on 3rd with 2 outs, I'd agree.  Man on 3rd with less than 2 outs, I disagree.  You're going to pitch differently if a reasonably deep fly brings in a run, unless perhaps you have a ridiculous lead.

we have a winner

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #143: May 31, 2011, 07:40:27 PM »
i'm just saying hairston has been awful with runner on 3rd go look it up. 

and if you think i was really sticking up for pudge there, you need to get yourself checked.

my point is that hairston doesn't control whether there's a guy on third or not, it doesn't really have any bearing on the at-bat, and thus that's more likely to be a fluke than anything else.

and i never said you were sticking up for pudge. my point was in your assertion that it wouldn't matter anyway...

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 22277
  • Let's drink a few for Mathguy.
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #144: May 31, 2011, 07:43:23 PM »
Then splooge.

AZ would reemerge out of nowhere to remind us of Dukes' greatness, his All Star debut, HR derby championship and NL MVP awards.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3582
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #145: May 31, 2011, 07:43:40 PM »
Marquis = Lannan.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #146: May 31, 2011, 07:45:09 PM »
how is it random if it happens a lot and he fails?

still random

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #147: May 31, 2011, 07:45:44 PM »
Man on 3rd with 2 outs, I'd agree.  Man on 3rd with less than 2 outs, I disagree.  You're going to pitch differently if a reasonably deep fly brings in a run, unless perhaps you have a ridiculous lead.

Okay, so if this is true, then wouldn't Hairston have an advantage? He knows where the pitcher can't pitch... not only does it not make sense logically, I guarantee you that over a larger sample, it proves to be relatively insignificant.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394

Offline PatsNats28

  • Posts: 8522
Re: Nationals vs Phillies, Game 2
« Reply #149: May 31, 2011, 07:46:08 PM »
still random

this. correlation does not imply causation (especially weak correlation).