Author Topic: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2  (Read 1517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline whupass

  • Posts: 112
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #25: May 28, 2011, 01:26:42 PM »
there's just no way morse should be given the green light on a pitcher that had just issued 3 consecutive walks. 
Ye' wudn't think so - but hell, he's swinging the hot bat.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #26: May 28, 2011, 01:27:22 PM »
Bet you didn't say that last night.

there's a difference.  when a pitcher had just walked 3 batters in a row.

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4044
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #27: May 28, 2011, 01:28:10 PM »
That was the second time in a row (Ankiel) misjudged a ball.


But, at least he's not as bad as Werth is on balls over his head.

Offline whupass

  • Posts: 112
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #28: May 28, 2011, 01:29:40 PM »

But, at least he's not as bad as Werth is on balls over his head.
Why JayDub don't play CF.

Offline whupass

  • Posts: 112
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #29: May 28, 2011, 01:30:00 PM »
Ankiel shows more good leather.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5954
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #30: May 28, 2011, 01:30:41 PM »
there's a difference.  when a pitcher had just walked 3 batters in a row.

Lol my powers out, I'm on espn from my phone. I have no idea what's going on.

Offline whupass

  • Posts: 112
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #31: May 28, 2011, 01:32:24 PM »
Lol my powers out, I'm on espn from my phone. I have no idea what's going on.
Where?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37344
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #32: May 28, 2011, 01:34:05 PM »
man it would've been nice to have gotten some runs that 1st inning :?

Offline whupass

  • Posts: 112
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #33: May 28, 2011, 01:36:11 PM »
With this line-up, the picher hasta' hit - nobody else will.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52101
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #34: May 28, 2011, 01:48:50 PM »
Bat hitting catcher's glove.   Never seen that before in my life.


How old are you?  :shock:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52101
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #35: May 28, 2011, 01:49:54 PM »
Bet you didn't say that last night.

Exactly. It's just moronic to nag about that. If he saw a pitch he liked he should swing and try to drive it.

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4044
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #36: May 28, 2011, 01:54:05 PM »
Quote
Bat hitting catcher's glove.   Never seen that before in my life.


How old are you?  


Let me clarify - I've seen catchers hit on swing follow-throughs.   When was the last time though that there was an "I-2" recorded in a game.

Also, keep in mind I was overseas for a while ... didn't see a baseball game for almost ten years.   And there was no team here for many years also.

Offline RL04

  • Posts: 4044
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #37: May 28, 2011, 02:00:51 PM »

But, at least he's not as bad as Werth is on balls over his head.


What did I just say . . .   :doh:

Online Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10559
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #38: May 28, 2011, 02:01:03 PM »
Who the hell is Tekotte?

Offline chemist

  • Posts: 1099
  • Cheering All Zimmermen
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #39: May 28, 2011, 02:01:03 PM »
how are we losing to this terrible team

shameful

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 17465
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #40: May 28, 2011, 02:06:50 PM »
4th   B Tekotte tripled to deep right, C Headley scored.   1   0
4th   K Phillips singled to left, B Tekotte scored.   2   0

Padres       2
Nationals  0


 :popcorn:

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83458
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #41: May 28, 2011, 02:07:56 PM »
lmao same old JZ. Too many strikes

Just lost the game against two guys I've never heard of

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52101
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #42: May 28, 2011, 02:16:35 PM »
 When was the last time though that there was an "I-2" recorded in a game.



As of last week there have been at least 93 "i-2" recorded in games since 2007 (in the regular season). So that probably averages out to just slightly under one "i-2" per week.  :lol:

Here's a table that shows the leaders (notice most of those guys are lefties). Pudge has been charged with 3 including today's.

link

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83458
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #43: May 28, 2011, 02:36:05 PM »
Haha pathetic Tim Stauffer owning. No offense per usual

Good game. No offense and JZ bends over for some minor leaguers with 2 outs

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52101
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #44: May 28, 2011, 02:36:54 PM »
how are we losing to this terrible team

shameful

Do you really have to ask?

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 83458
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #45: May 28, 2011, 02:38:14 PM »
74 pitches in 6 innings embarrassing

Good job Rizzo you douchebag

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52101
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #46: May 28, 2011, 02:39:03 PM »
It's imbecilic to nag about Zimmermann. That was a quality start and gave the team a chance to win this game.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #47: May 28, 2011, 02:40:49 PM »
Ugh I just woke up, maybe I should go back to bed

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 52101
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #48: May 28, 2011, 02:41:27 PM »
Ugh I just woke up, maybe I should go back to bed

Take another swig of the whiskey and crash back down.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5954
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals vs Padres, Game 2
« Reply #49: May 28, 2011, 02:43:03 PM »
Best Burnett we've seen in a while.