Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2  (Read 3555 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TylerDC

  • Posts: 5954
  • The Future.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #725: April 09, 2011, 10:18:11 PM »
Fun while it lasted.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13474
  • In the market for lavish mansions 'n NBA expansion
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #726: April 09, 2011, 10:18:14 PM »
Throw Jose a stirke. The Mofo can't hit to save his life.

You were saying?

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30008
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #727: April 09, 2011, 10:18:21 PM »
I think that's the universe telling us that those runs were destined to be scored, interference be damned.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #728: April 09, 2011, 10:18:48 PM »
i really hate brad anus

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12261
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #729: April 09, 2011, 10:18:55 PM »
 :hang:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27836
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #730: April 09, 2011, 10:18:56 PM »
Only in that they both sucked when they got on the bump. Other than that, I'm sure they're life story is very different.

Broderick is a prospect, who's shown nice promise.  Sure, he's overwhelmed by the stress of reaching the bigs, but that's independent of his abilities.  Bruney?  Not a prospect, no future at all.

And you could improve your posts if you learned the difference between "they're" and "their".  "They're" is a contraction of "they are", which obviously doesn't fit in your sentence.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #731: April 09, 2011, 10:19:04 PM »
broderick sucks

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13474
  • In the market for lavish mansions 'n NBA expansion
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #732: April 09, 2011, 10:19:06 PM »
Now FP is moving into "this is unacceptable" mode.

Online Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 10624
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #733: April 09, 2011, 10:19:13 PM »
Hit two guys in an inning and you wil pay.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 25817
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #734: April 09, 2011, 10:19:19 PM »
Is Slaten going to walk in a run?!?!

Worse !!!

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7350
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #735: April 09, 2011, 10:20:01 PM »
inexcusable pitching by slaten. Pathetic inability to throw strikes early in the count with bases loaded.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15531
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #736: April 09, 2011, 10:20:03 PM »
This blows. Whatever, tomorrow is the rubber game. 3-5 is better than 2-6, 1-7, 0-8. (still sucks :rant: )

yes I know, half an inning left

Online PC

  • Posts: 40474
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #737: April 09, 2011, 10:20:04 PM »
We have got to get Broderick into the minors!  Of course, since we're in open warfare with the Cardinals (thanks, Nyjer and Tony LaRussa) they'll never make a trade with us.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13474
  • In the market for lavish mansions 'n NBA expansion
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #738: April 09, 2011, 10:20:15 PM »
"Sharkmen" looks pretty interesting.

Offline Senators2005

  • Lake Ridge, VA
  • Posts: 12261
  • Go Natsssssss!
    • http://nationalsnation.spaces.live.com/
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #739: April 09, 2011, 10:20:54 PM »
Good night everyone...it's been yet another E.D. evening without viagra thanks to the NL East version of the Pittsburgh Pirates.   :?

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #740: April 09, 2011, 10:21:14 PM »
Broderick is a prospect, who's shown nice promise.  Sure, he's overwhelmed by the stress of reaching the bigs, but that's independent of his abilities.  Bruney?  Not a prospect, no future at all.

And you could improve your posts if you learned the difference between "they're" and "their".  "They're" is a contraction of "they are", which obviously doesn't fit in your sentence.

if anyone is this year's bruney, it could be gaudin.

good 'stuff,' has a decent history of pitching at least ok.  but pretty much melts down every time once he's in the game for us.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #741: April 09, 2011, 10:21:30 PM »
alex cora and not nix?

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27836
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #742: April 09, 2011, 10:22:02 PM »
broderick sucks

He is/should be a minor leaguer.  That's not the same as sucking.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13474
  • In the market for lavish mansions 'n NBA expansion
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #743: April 09, 2011, 10:22:04 PM »

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37347
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #744: April 09, 2011, 10:22:10 PM »
alex cora and not nix?

it really doesn't matter

Online ronnynat

  • Posts: 23223
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #745: April 09, 2011, 10:22:21 PM »
Broderick is a prospect, who's shown nice promise.  Sure, he's overwhelmed by the stress of reaching the bigs, but that's independent of his abilities.  Bruney?  Not a prospect, no future at all.

He was also a starter in the minors and never pitched above AA. Can't be easy. Still, I think we should have sent this one back.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 13474
  • In the market for lavish mansions 'n NBA expansion
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #746: April 09, 2011, 10:22:21 PM »
He is/should be a minor leaguer.  That's not the same as sucking.

Unfortunately he's still in the Show. 

Offline skippy1999

  • Posts: 5253
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #747: April 09, 2011, 10:22:29 PM »
inexcusable pitching by slaten. Pathetic inability to throw strikes early in the count with bases loaded.

That's a bit harsh, he was brought in with the bases loaded and no outs, he was kind of doomed from the start.

Online Baseball is Life

  • Posts: 10624
  • Proud member of the Sunshine Squad.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #748: April 09, 2011, 10:22:39 PM »

And you could improve your posts if you learned the difference between "they're" and "their".  "They're" is a contraction of "they are", which obviously doesn't fit in your sentence.
Thanks. I know the diff. I just don't give a sh*t. This is not English class. And I was a journalist for 15 years. I actually used to write for a living.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 25817
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #749: April 09, 2011, 10:23:21 PM »
Thanks. I know the diff. I just don't give a sh*t. This is not English class. And I was a journalist for 15 years. I actually used to write for a living.

Damn I like that attitude.