Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2  (Read 4490 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #225: April 09, 2011, 08:21:08 PM »
this is a good AB by JHjr

Online imref

  • Posts: 18853
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #226: April 09, 2011, 08:21:15 PM »
Snow flurries here in potomac. Wonderful

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 20537
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #227: April 09, 2011, 08:21:15 PM »
these umps suck

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37221
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #228: April 09, 2011, 08:21:35 PM »
these umps suck

They are just plain insane. Get tossed, Jerry. Get bent, ump!

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #229: April 09, 2011, 08:21:38 PM »
riggleman should be going up to HP ump and 1B ump

Online madj55

  • Posts: 5922
  • 2015 Nationals.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #230: April 09, 2011, 08:21:47 PM »
i used to strongly dislike carpenter when he was with don sutton or whatever his name is but i like him more now

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30151
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #231: April 09, 2011, 08:21:51 PM »
Not taking crap from the umps anymore.  Love it.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #232: April 09, 2011, 08:22:05 PM »
OH NO WAY

Online sportsfan882

  • Posts: 89745
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #233: April 09, 2011, 08:22:09 PM »
Bullcrap. He checked

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #234: April 09, 2011, 08:22:19 PM »
riggleman was furious

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37221
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #235: April 09, 2011, 08:22:43 PM »
riggleman was furious

He should have bumped the ump.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23248
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #236: April 09, 2011, 08:23:00 PM »
riggleman was furious

That was Jim going apecrap.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 20537
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #237: April 09, 2011, 08:23:03 PM »
Charlie and Dave said that that is usually not a swing, but that interpretation of a check swing always varies from one ump to another.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #238: April 09, 2011, 08:23:37 PM »
That was Jim going apecrap.

hahahaha ... but you can tell he's not happy tonight.  

it takes a lot to set him off, but when you do, he'll get in your face.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30151
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #239: April 09, 2011, 08:23:47 PM »
I'm not sure if you guys are joking or what, but we've definitely seen Riggleman more angry than that before.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 31977
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #240: April 09, 2011, 08:23:56 PM »
Crunch time.   I'm going to walk the dog.   In the past, this hasn't always worked out real well but I have confidence in this group.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 20537
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #241: April 09, 2011, 08:24:05 PM »
I bet Riggs gets tossed tonight.

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 14077
  • You have the right to remain swolen.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #242: April 09, 2011, 08:24:43 PM »
I'm not sure if you guys are joking or what, but we've definitely seen Riggleman more angry than that before.

Oh yeah, one game last year he laid into, of all people, Joe West.  Pretty awesome.

Offline shoeshineboy

  • Posts: 7538
  • Walks Kill!! Walks Kill! Walks Kill!!!!
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #243: April 09, 2011, 08:25:14 PM »
There's no rule about a checked swing. It comes down to whether the guy attempted to hit the ball, not how far he goes. That was close, but he did check up in a way that indicated he was backing off from it. We've been screwed on much more obvious attempts than that. These umps need to call that both ways.

Online PC

  • Posts: 44139
  • And then there were six...
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #244: April 09, 2011, 08:25:20 PM »
Yet, Lance Berkman's WASN'T a swing...

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #245: April 09, 2011, 08:26:15 PM »
There's no rule about a checked swing. It comes down to whether the guy attempted to hit the ball, not how far he goes. That was close, but he did check up in a way that indicated he was backing off from it. We've been screwed on much more obvious attempts than that. These umps need to call that both ways.
They should have a fault line, like in bowling.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #246: April 09, 2011, 08:26:24 PM »

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37363
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #247: April 09, 2011, 08:26:46 PM »
haha gorzelanny :clap:

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37221
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #248: April 09, 2011, 08:26:48 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)


ONE MORE WORD AND IM GONNA EAT YOUR FACE - RAWR PIZZA

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 14077
  • You have the right to remain swolen.