Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1  (Read 6168 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40929
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #75: April 08, 2011, 04:26:25 PM »
According to NESN, Manny Ramirez got popped again for steroids so he's retiring.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12648
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #76: April 08, 2011, 04:27:07 PM »
Is it just my TV, or are the close-up shots of Zimm painful? The two tone cap is looking pixelated and wierd.

Offline CJames0569

  • Posts: 1698
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #77: April 08, 2011, 04:27:08 PM »
Yeah, he is the best true CF right now.

We don't have anyone promising above him though, right? Isn't Perez only in single A or something.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #78: April 08, 2011, 04:27:36 PM »
i thought that was a gapper all the way (or at least base hit).

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 16278
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #79: April 08, 2011, 04:27:41 PM »
Is Eury Perez still considered our best CF player in the minors?

Until Bryce Harper gets experience there, yes.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #80: April 08, 2011, 04:27:43 PM »
friday night game, it was awesome.

It was Friday the 13th wasn't it?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #81: April 08, 2011, 04:27:44 PM »
Got lucky against Wright and Beltran. Leaving fastballs up in the zone. Needs to mix in another pitch to keep them off balanced

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12648
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #82: April 08, 2011, 04:28:09 PM »
Looked like Werth misjudged it a little too, or was forced to take a strange approach.

i thought that was a gapper all the way (or at least base hit).

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #83: April 08, 2011, 04:28:54 PM »
We don't have anyone promising above him though, right? Isn't Perez only in single A or something.

He is at Potomac, probably won't be up until September 2012 at the very earliest.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #84: April 08, 2011, 04:30:49 PM »
Looking weak against Dickey. Hitting the ball straight up in the air. Need to sit back and drive it the other way

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18191
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #85: April 08, 2011, 04:30:51 PM »
I like the swings we're getting early.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 16278
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #86: April 08, 2011, 04:30:52 PM »
Yeah Ankiel!

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #87: April 08, 2011, 04:30:59 PM »
good job rick :clap:

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12648
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #88: April 08, 2011, 04:31:06 PM »
Guys are making contact, but I guess that's part of a knuckle-baller's game?

Offline CJames0569

  • Posts: 1698
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #89: April 08, 2011, 04:31:07 PM »
Until Bryce Harper gets experience there, yes.

Haha that's where I was going Houston Nat, the Nats have Harper in RF currently, correct? Does he have enough speed to play CF? I know the idea has been mentioned but I was wondering how realistic it is.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12648
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #90: April 08, 2011, 04:32:12 PM »
Is that Mayor Bloomberg we keep getting a shot of, in the first row?

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #91: April 08, 2011, 04:33:19 PM »
thank god. Ankiel not even close

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #92: April 08, 2011, 04:33:28 PM »
how funny would it be if pudge got his first hit off this dude.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #93: April 08, 2011, 04:33:34 PM »
Time for Rodriguez to produce.

Offline RobDibblesGhost

  • Posts: 18388
  • Is it 2015 yet?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #94: April 08, 2011, 04:33:37 PM »
thank god. Ankiel not even close
  and it was a bad throw too

Offline CJames0569

  • Posts: 1698
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #95: April 08, 2011, 04:33:50 PM »
:rofl: the mets announcers were saying ball 4 to espinosa was right down the middle

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12648
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #96: April 08, 2011, 04:34:01 PM »
June of last year?
Time for Rodriguez to produce.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 86600
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #97: April 08, 2011, 04:34:20 PM »
:rofl: the mets announcers were saying ball 4 to espinosa was right down the middle

It looked like a strike

Offline CJames0569

  • Posts: 1698
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #98: April 08, 2011, 04:34:23 PM »
replayed showed it wasn't close or it was low and outside, late movement I guess. Ankiel looked hosed.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 1
« Reply #99: April 08, 2011, 04:34:27 PM »
swung at ball 3 old man