Author Topic: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1  (Read 4309 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14314
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #225: April 05, 2011, 07:30:58 PM »
Good catch by Morse :clap:

Yep.  If he misjudges it just a tad, it might be out.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33803
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #226: April 05, 2011, 07:31:07 PM »
Vamos Ramos!

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #227: April 05, 2011, 07:31:10 PM »
if he gets shelled today we should send him down and bring up bixler 8)

Nice, but make it 3 in a row and then bring up Detwiler

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #228: April 05, 2011, 07:31:29 PM »
Thank you Omar Infante for that bunt out.  Still baffled/grateful he did that.
Yeah that made absolutely no sense.

:crazy: ... it's a 1-0 game in the bottom of 1st, interesting.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #229: April 05, 2011, 07:31:30 PM »
Ramos might be ROY

Online Vega

  • Posts: 4465
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #230: April 05, 2011, 07:31:33 PM »
Ramos is a beast.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33803
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #231: April 05, 2011, 07:31:40 PM »
If Cora bunts here... I will flip my lid.

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #232: April 05, 2011, 07:31:49 PM »
he should bunt here to set the table for Marquis!

Offline JMUalumni

  • Posts: 7789
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #233: April 05, 2011, 07:31:55 PM »
In general, small ball is stupid and hurts your chances of scoring runs. *

* - Mindfact

Oh I don't disagree.

Ramos is doing his best to lock down the catching job.  It seems obvious to everyone but Riggs that he is the starting catcher for this team.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #234: April 05, 2011, 07:31:59 PM »
If Cora bunts here... I will flip my lid.

hE'll smack a double

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #235: April 05, 2011, 07:32:17 PM »
Nice, but make it 3 in a row and then bring up Detwiler

remember when folks were :panic: when werth was batting less than .200 in spring training ... desmond will be fine.  and his defense so far looks great (knock on wood).

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #236: April 05, 2011, 07:32:27 PM »
Nice, but make it 3 in a row and then bring up Detwiler



Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #237: April 05, 2011, 07:32:28 PM »
no low strikes today.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #238: April 05, 2011, 07:32:52 PM »
Ramos.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33803
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #239: April 05, 2011, 07:33:09 PM »
We heard the "guess who was working out next to me" story with Dibble and Pudge last year.

Now it's FP and Cora.

Heh.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #240: April 05, 2011, 07:33:35 PM »
Ramos is doing his best to lock down the catching job.  It seems obvious to everyone but Riggs that he is the starting catcher for this team.

see i disagree ... he came out the other day and said they would split the first 10 games and in the process they'd groom ramos as the everyday guy.  so the plan is already in affect.  i'm glad it's happening now and not 2 months into the season.

pudge as our backup catcher :az: i'll take it

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 26674
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #241: April 05, 2011, 07:33:41 PM »
Double switch

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #242: April 05, 2011, 07:33:41 PM »
hE'll smack a double

haha nice - morrison is a pathetic fielder

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54493
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #243: April 05, 2011, 07:33:46 PM »

The Marlins outfield defense is going to be atrocious with Infante in CF and Bonifacio in right. We need bloops!

:shock:

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33803
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #244: April 05, 2011, 07:33:58 PM »
If there's a time for a player to bunt, I don't mind a pitcher doing that.

Of course, Marquis is a decent hitter... so maybe he should swing away.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #245: April 05, 2011, 07:34:06 PM »
no low strikes today.

that's going to hurt marquis :nervous:

Offline Tyler Durden

  • Posts: 7971
  • Leprechaun
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #246: April 05, 2011, 07:34:08 PM »
Marquis is a better hitter than Pudge.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40941
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #247: April 05, 2011, 07:34:33 PM »
Speaking of Logan Morrison...

Why is his name highlighted in ESPN boxscore?  It was like this last year too.

http://scores.espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=310405128&teams=washington-nationals-vs-florida-marlins

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #248: April 05, 2011, 07:34:37 PM »
If there's a time for a player to bunt, I don't mind a pitcher doing that.

Of course, Marquis is a decent hitter... so maybe he should swing away.

Riggs avoiding the DP, playing to not lose, I hate it.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23228
Re: Nationals @ Marlins, Game 1
« Reply #249: April 05, 2011, 07:34:46 PM »
Ramos might be ROY

I think Espinosa is going to get it. Hopefully both end up in the top 5. That'd be great.