So BPro and anything stat-geeky is garbage, unless they praise the Nats, in which case we should applaud the finding?
I never called it "garbage" (and if I did it was in an effort to piss tomterp off), I've always maintained in serious discussions that "stat-geeky" material needs to be mixed with a dose of non-quantifyable scouting material in order to paint the full picture. Topics often get divided proving a player either "rules" or "sucks" by people cherry-picking their favorite numbers to prove their arguments.
But whatever. Yes. You nailed it Inspector. You got me.
And I would've gotten away with it if it weren't for you meddling kids.