Author Topic: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1  (Read 12701 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37365
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #150: September 17, 2010, 09:13:31 PM »
Yet potomac you continue to act like kasten and say you think this team is close to competing.

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #151: September 17, 2010, 09:13:32 PM »
these are the kinds of games that Dibble made watchable.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #152: September 17, 2010, 09:14:50 PM »
Showalter had a point about the September call-ups making managing too easy, he proposed that teams should have to pick 25 players to dress a night, that might make things more interesting.

That's a really good idea.  It's like the NFL's active/inactive designation except this one makes sense.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 37714
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #153: September 17, 2010, 09:15:00 PM »
Kennedy went 4-5 during Oswalt's first start for the Phills back in July - I think it was Kilgore that tweeted "Kennedy kills Oswalt"

I remember the original ... :)

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #154: September 17, 2010, 09:17:24 PM »
That's a really good idea.  It's like the NFL's active/inactive designation except this one makes sense.

yeah, showalter was laughing at how some teams were scanning the waiver wire just to get an extra pinch runner.

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #155: September 17, 2010, 09:19:52 PM »
top of the ninth at Potomac, P-Nats still up 2-1

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #156: September 17, 2010, 09:21:00 PM »
for all the negatives about this team, at least we get to see Zimmerman play almost every night.

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #157: September 17, 2010, 09:22:35 PM »
NATS WIN THE CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!

(Potomac!)

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 37714
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #158: September 17, 2010, 09:23:17 PM »
NATS WIN THE CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!

(Potomac!)

Yes sir !!!

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47235
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #159: September 17, 2010, 09:23:37 PM »
Dunn, the rally killer.

Offline Spinman

  • Posts: 2148
  • Grandpa Spinman
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #160: September 17, 2010, 09:24:43 PM »

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47235
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #161: September 17, 2010, 09:27:33 PM »
Ray kneeling before the Lerners.   :spaz:

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 29905
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #162: September 17, 2010, 09:29:09 PM »
Dunn's great defense is not enough to save the rest of the bums from themselves.

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #163: September 17, 2010, 09:31:56 PM »
Ray kneeling before the Lerners.   :spaz:

a few weeks ago he was praising the lerners for signing our high draft picks.  sigh...

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #164: September 17, 2010, 09:32:25 PM »
for all the negatives about this team, at least we get to see Zimmerman play almost every night.
It's like '07-'09 all over again!

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #165: September 17, 2010, 09:32:40 PM »
Dunn's great defense is not enough to save the rest of the bums from themselves.
:funny:
  :thumbs:

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #166: September 17, 2010, 09:34:35 PM »
i'm guessing we'll see Bally shortly.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #167: September 17, 2010, 09:44:10 PM »
Can't wait to never hear Wil Nieves's batting music again.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #168: September 17, 2010, 09:51:41 PM »
Can't wait to never hear Wil Nieves's batting music again.

HEY!  There's nothing wrong with the music.  Give it to Espinosa and have Wil move along.

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #169: September 17, 2010, 09:54:24 PM »
HEY!  There's nothing wrong with the music.  Give it to Espinosa and have Wil move along.
Fair enough.

Nats lost by the way for those of you who were wondering.

Online imref

  • Posts: 20551
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #170: September 17, 2010, 09:54:52 PM »
let us never speak of this game again.

Offline Potomac Cannons

  • Posts: 3279
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #171: September 17, 2010, 09:55:50 PM »
let us never speak of this game again.

What game?

Offline MarquisDeSade

  • Posts: 14585
  • Yeah, it's a 50 caliber.
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #172: September 17, 2010, 10:00:31 PM »
The wit and wisdom of Phil Wood - "Its not that Marquis pitched all that bad, he just couldn't get anyone out."

Offline bglide

  • banned
  • Posts: 452
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #173: September 17, 2010, 10:51:17 PM »
Marquis is trash.  DFA that bum, Willie Harris, Kevin Mench, Will Nieves, Alberto Gonzalez, and Justin Maxwell. No reason any of these guys should be on a big league club.  Why are they here?  They don't help us win, and they are all old.  Play the young kids. 

Offline Sharp

  • Posts: 3583
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #174: September 17, 2010, 11:07:15 PM »
Marquis is trash.  DFA that bum, Willie Harris, Kevin Mench, Will Nieves, Alberto Gonzalez, and Justin Maxwell. No reason any of these guys should be on a big league club.  Why are they here?  They don't help us win, and they are all old.  Play the young kids. 
Maxwell isn't old... he's not a big leaguer IMO, but he's not old.