Author Topic: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3  (Read 37481 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #150: September 08, 2010, 03:11:30 PM »
Or, at least spend moderate cash on Werth. :P

werth is fine.  i'd rather have crawford, but i'd still be :az: if we went out and got werth. 

that'd mean bernie vs. nyjer for center.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #151: September 08, 2010, 03:11:49 PM »
bottom 9th ... let's see how we fail this time around.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #152: September 08, 2010, 03:12:06 PM »
fingers crossed that Espinosa adds a walk-off to his first few weeks.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35128
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #153: September 08, 2010, 03:12:55 PM »
werth is fine.  i'd rather have crawford, but i'd still be :az: if we went out and got werth. 

that'd mean bernie vs. nyjer for center.

It's all about improving where you can.

You're not going to do better than Zimm and Dunn at the corners.

Desmond and Espinosa seem to be fine up the middle.

OF is the big question outside of the rotation.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #154: September 08, 2010, 03:13:37 PM »
werth is fine.  i'd rather have crawford, but i'd still be :az: if we went out and got werth. 

that'd mean bernie vs. nyjer for center.
If it comes to that, I'd have to give the edge to Bernie.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #155: September 08, 2010, 03:14:14 PM »
Oh, yeah.  I forgot KRod wasn't on the team right now...

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #156: September 08, 2010, 03:15:08 PM »
ORDER PLACED: Hit and walkoff.


Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #157: September 08, 2010, 03:16:32 PM »
oh good asian pitchers pwn us.

Offline ronnynat

  • Posts: 23269
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #158: September 08, 2010, 03:16:59 PM »
Wow, that was an ugly swing.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #159: September 08, 2010, 03:17:11 PM »
wow three runs last two games ... good job guys! 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #160: September 08, 2010, 03:17:23 PM »
is there any way espinosa can hit a solo 2R HR?

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7593
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #161: September 08, 2010, 03:19:11 PM »
The most exciting thing in this inning was a foul ball. :?

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #162: September 08, 2010, 03:19:20 PM »
down to .409.  Sigh...

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 35128
  • World Champions!!!
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #163: September 08, 2010, 03:19:20 PM »
Almost.

Offline mitlen

  • Posts: 66171
  • We had 'em all the way.
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #164: September 08, 2010, 03:20:00 PM »
is there any way espinosa can hit a solo 2R HR?

Pudge could :)

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 23843
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #165: September 08, 2010, 03:20:40 PM »
GAME OVER.  WE LOSE.




Offline bglide

  • banned
  • Posts: 452
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #166: September 08, 2010, 03:21:09 PM »
Wow, this team sucks.  As bad as the offense was the last two games, the starting pitching let us down against this Mutts team.  A ton of colleges could run out a better lineup than they did the last two nights. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #167: September 08, 2010, 03:23:02 PM »
guess we can lock the "catch the mets" thread.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 42404
  • Re-contending in 202...5?
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #168: September 08, 2010, 03:24:08 PM »
Wow, this team sucks.  As bad as the offense was the last two games, the starting pitching let us down against this Mutts team.  A ton of colleges could run out a better lineup than they did the last two nights. 

3 ER in 6.1 IP isn't "letting us down", it's not great, but we had a chance to win this game.  What let us down was 0-2 with the bases loaded, 1 out.

Offline HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 21588
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #169: September 08, 2010, 03:24:19 PM »
Maybe the pressure of being only three wins away from 63 is getting to the team

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #170: September 08, 2010, 03:26:47 PM »
3 ER in 6.1 IP isn't "letting us down", it's not great, but we had a chance to win this game.  What let us down was 0-2 with the bases loaded, 1 out.

yeah ummm livan was fine.  the leadoff walk hurt and his pitching to the opposing pitcher wasn't stellar, but other than that he gave us a chance to win.  the nats offense provided two runs after crapting the bed against a rookie last night.  they didn't do their job.  just a pathetic performance from the bats.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37398
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #171: September 08, 2010, 03:27:25 PM »
Ramos is awesome.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #172: September 08, 2010, 03:28:23 PM »
i hate midweek day games.  sucks.

Offline bglide

  • banned
  • Posts: 452
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #173: September 08, 2010, 03:34:26 PM »
Just a really disappointing series.   Every time it looks like we are going to go on a run, we implode. 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Mets, Game 3
« Reply #174: September 08, 2010, 03:34:53 PM »