Author Topic: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2  (Read 8299 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 19714
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #200: September 04, 2010, 09:59:53 PM »
Just coming back from the dc united match, how are the nats doing? Gimme a short summary

Winning this match too.
 :uk:

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 15425
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #201: September 04, 2010, 10:00:04 PM »
Lannan pitched great through 7, Pudge hit a dinger and two more base hits (no GIDPs for Pudge tonight) and the kids are... alright! Up 9-2.
Up 9-2, Lannan great through 7, Espinosa is looking good.  Pudge didn't GIDP, actually had 4 RBIs including a 2 run HR :shock:

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #202: September 04, 2010, 10:00:12 PM »
Just coming back from the dc united match, how are the nats doing? Gimme a short summary

Pudge was hot.

Espinosa 2010 > Desmond 2009 but Desmond 2010 has three hits tonight

...and John Lannan is a better man than any of us.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10716
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #203: September 04, 2010, 10:00:46 PM »
Good ol' better mannan Lannan.

Online imref

  • Posts: 20805
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #204: September 04, 2010, 10:01:18 PM »
I like 108 and 137 both.  Clear view of the field that some other sections (101 specifically) don't have.

i've sat in the LF corner a bunch of times (usually a bit closer, 110), they aren't bad but I much prefer the infield gallery even at a lower cost.

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10716
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #205: September 04, 2010, 10:02:19 PM »
Up 9-2, Lannan great through 7, Espinosa is looking good.  Pudge didn't GIDP, actually had 4 RBIs including a 2 run HR :shock:
Almost forgot, Nyjer SLID instead of running over the catcher.  But was out anyway.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #206: September 04, 2010, 10:02:32 PM »
"How sweet it is !!"

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 19714
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #207: September 04, 2010, 10:03:16 PM »
... BANG!!! ...ZOOM!!!  NATIONALS WIN!!

POST ANOTHER CURLY  :w: BABY!!!!



Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 15425
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #208: September 04, 2010, 10:03:16 PM »
But Milledge made us forget about Nyjer by doing neither when coming home.
Almost forgot, Nyjer SLID instead of running over the catcher.  But was out anyway.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #209: September 04, 2010, 10:05:06 PM »
Damn, I like the interview with Pudge "in uniform".

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 15425
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #210: September 04, 2010, 10:05:10 PM »
That was the most natural intro I've ever heard Debbie do... she didn't flub a word in the whole five sentence interview.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 10612
  • Send the Tardis back for Bucky
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #211: September 04, 2010, 10:05:45 PM »
58 wins. Five more and < 100 losses; 15 more and under 90 losses.


Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #212: September 04, 2010, 10:06:19 PM »
good game.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #213: September 04, 2010, 10:10:54 PM »
Phil has a new haircut?    LOL

Online imref

  • Posts: 20805
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #214: September 04, 2010, 10:10:56 PM »
1-1 without Riggleman, seems like a no-brainer to fire him. :stir:

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #215: September 04, 2010, 10:11:34 PM »
Need a report from the 'burgh by Nats' fans.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #216: September 04, 2010, 10:12:16 PM »
1-1 without Riggleman, seems like a no-brainer to fire him. :stir:

... should have kept Acta.

Offline chemist

  • Posts: 1099
  • Cheering All Zimmermen
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #217: September 04, 2010, 10:14:12 PM »
Just coming back from the dc united match, how are the nats doing? Gimme a short summary

off topic, but I have followed dcu with the voraciousness of a thousand hyenas since 1996, but this year, i've found them completely unwatchable (hence me showing up here)

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #218: September 04, 2010, 10:14:31 PM »
McLaren looks like:


Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #219: September 04, 2010, 10:15:11 PM »
off topic, but I have followed dcu with the voraciousness of a thousand hyenas since 1996, but this year, i've found them completely unwatchable (hence me showing up here)

Let's go Dips !

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #220: September 04, 2010, 10:15:43 PM »
Did Wood ever play ball?

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #221: September 04, 2010, 10:16:44 PM »
Don't mean to be hoggish but I don't remember seeing a Luna commercial tonight.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37230
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday

Offline nats2playoffs

  • Posts: 19714
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #223: September 04, 2010, 10:20:56 PM »
John McLaren... TWO WORDS:


Online mitlen

  • Posts: 39167
  • We had 'em all the way
Re: Nationals @ Pirates, Game 2
« Reply #224: September 04, 2010, 10:23:24 PM »
How does Phil Wood remember this crap?   Speed?    Coke?