Author Topic: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1  (Read 3948 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 26775
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #350: August 20, 2010, 09:59:44 PM »
Dibs is rough.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 26775
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #351: August 20, 2010, 10:00:40 PM »
there goes my winning streak...

I thought you'd pull it off.    I got the blues.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #352: August 20, 2010, 10:00:45 PM »
there goes my winning streak...

yeah but you fixed Marquis to some degree.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18213
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #353: August 20, 2010, 10:01:41 PM »
yeah but you fixed Marquis to some degree.
Yeah, but I'm not into close calls.  Just the W's.

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7666
  • ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    • Photos
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #354: August 20, 2010, 10:01:46 PM »
So freaking close. Bah!

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 26775
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #355: August 20, 2010, 10:02:11 PM »
Yeah, but I'm not into close calls.  Just the W's.

Moral victory :)

Online PC

  • Posts: 41015
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #356: August 20, 2010, 10:04:05 PM »
YOU KILLED US BERNADINA!

Offline ernie0326

  • Posts: 2113
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #357: August 20, 2010, 10:04:13 PM »

Offline NeedaNewNick

  • Posts: 425
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #358: August 20, 2010, 10:04:46 PM »
Another terrible loss by our low payroll ballclub

yup, and plenty more to come in 2011 if they don't up the budget for the field manager

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #359: August 20, 2010, 10:08:15 PM »
I can't help but imagine what would have happened if they sent Nyjer home on that fly ball in the 1st inning.

Offline Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 16832
  • Mantra of the SSS
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #360: August 20, 2010, 10:09:00 PM »

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #361: August 20, 2010, 10:09:46 PM »
God Dunn Bernadina is awful and Desmond is a beast.

Embarrassing loss.

ASSCLOWN!

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7666
  • ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    • Photos
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #362: August 20, 2010, 10:12:30 PM »
The LOB hall of Shame.

You cannot win if you don't score.

Bernadina (6)
Zimmerman (4)
Morgan (2)
Kennedy (2)

*Marquis (3) omitted because his is a pitcher.

Offline GMUNat

  • Posts: 5212
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #363: August 20, 2010, 10:14:07 PM »
Only with the Nats do the fans actually applaud performances by starters who throw 5 IP and walk 4 guys with 1 K, allow 8 baserunners in 5 innings (1.60 WHIP). Just goes to show you how low the bar of expectation is after what MLB and the Lerners did to this team.

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11291
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #364: August 20, 2010, 10:14:18 PM »
God Dunn is awful and Desmond is a beast.

Embarrassing loss.

shut up and go sit in the corner.

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33832
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #365: August 20, 2010, 10:16:06 PM »
Only with the Nats do the fans actually applaud performances by starters who throw 5 IP and walk 4 guys with 1 K, allow 8 baserunners in 5 innings (1.60 WHIP). Just goes to show you how low the bar of expectation is after what MLB and the Lerners did to this team.

Were you not applauding Lannan and his 1.50 WHIP yesterday? I sure seem to remember you doing that.

Offline Mathguy

  • Posts: 3863
  • Whoa That Was A Good One ! Poke His Brain Here !
    • Outer Banks Beach House
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #366: August 20, 2010, 10:20:14 PM »
So how did Marquis do tonight ?

Offline GMUNat

  • Posts: 5212
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #367: August 20, 2010, 10:21:14 PM »
Were you not applauding Lannan and his 1.50 WHIP yesterday? I sure seem to remember you doing that.
There is a difference between a 1.50 WHIP that is because of 4 walks and 4 hits and one that has 7 hits and 1 walk. The first is unsustainable while the 2nd one is unlucky. Since Lannan has come back, he has a sustainable 3.09 ERA because his WHIP is 1.20, BABIP is .310, FIP is 3.11, His K rate doubled from the first half (2.9 K/9 to 5.8 K/9), Walk rate was cut in half (4.2 to 1.9).

Online HalfSmokes

  • Posts: 15113
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #368: August 20, 2010, 10:22:03 PM »
So how did Marquis do tonight ?

depends on whether or not you believe in luck (8 baserunners, 5 innings, but only 1 run)

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #369: August 20, 2010, 10:22:05 PM »
There is a difference between a 1.50 WHIP that is because of 4 walks and 4 hits and one that has 7 hits and 1 walk. The first is unsustainable while the 2nd one is unlucky. Since Lannan has come back, he has a sustainable 3.09 ERA because his WHIP is 1.20, BABIP is .310, FIP is 3.11, His K rate doubled from the first half (2.9 K/9 to 5.8 K/9), Walk rate was cut in half (4.2 to 1.9).


Lannan is better than Halliday? :lmao: :crazy: :hurr:

Offline Obed_Marsh

  • Posts: 7666
  • ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    • Photos
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #370: August 20, 2010, 10:22:54 PM »
So how did Marquis do tonight ?

He got lucky by only allowing one run. Could have been much worse. Fielding was brutal. Offense lacked clutch hitting entirely.

The only consolation was being in it until the end. We could have tied it or won at nearly any time.

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33832
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #371: August 20, 2010, 10:24:54 PM »
There is a difference between a 1.50 WHIP that is because of 4 walks and 4 hits and one that has 7 hits and 1 walk. The first is unsustainable while the 2nd one is unlucky. Since Lannan has come back, he has a sustainable 3.09 ERA because his WHIP is 1.20, BABIP is .310, FIP is 3.11, His K rate doubled from the first half (2.9 K/9 to 5.8 K/9), Walk rate was cut in half (4.2 to 1.9).

Gotcha, so its lucky when another pitcher does it, but its old hat when Lannan pulls it off. Ok.

Offline GMUNat

  • Posts: 5212
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #372: August 20, 2010, 10:26:09 PM »

Lannan is better than Halliday? :lmao: :crazy: :hurr:
Where did I say that? I'm assuming that you are arguing about whether Lannan's start yesterday was better than Halladay's start today. I'd argue it was close. Lannan had a better K rate, BB rate, WHIP. Halladay's 7 inning's pitched probably gives him the edge, but Halladay faced a crappy lineup while Lannan faced a decent lineup. Anyways it's a dumb argument because arguing over 1 start sample sizes isn't productive.

Offline GMUNat

  • Posts: 5212
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #373: August 20, 2010, 10:28:25 PM »
Gotcha, so its lucky when another pitcher does it, but its old hat when Lannan pulls it off. Ok.
Lannan had a decent outing because he did the things he could control well (K's, BB's, HR, GB) and limited the damage. Marquis had a 1/4 K/BB rate. That is embarrasing. When Lannan was "lucky" the past 2 years, he wasn't walking more guys than strike outs.

Offline welch

  • Posts: 8524
  • Myer and Travis and Rice, and Bucky to manage...
Re: Nationals @ Phillies, Game 1
« Reply #374: August 20, 2010, 10:56:40 PM »
well, Marquis lowered his ERA, if that matters. (which is doesn't).