Author Topic: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3  (Read 2694 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33589
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #125: August 12, 2010, 10:52:47 PM »
Here comes something in the dirt.

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85278
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #126: August 12, 2010, 10:53:05 PM »
predictable. not even close :lmao:

Offline NatsAddict

  • Posts: 4095
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #127: August 12, 2010, 10:53:23 PM »
He's expanded his zone significantly this year.  Note the drop in walks.

That stunk.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33589
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #128: August 12, 2010, 10:53:23 PM »
I win.

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 53295
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #129: August 12, 2010, 10:53:57 PM »
Contract this freaking team!   :panic:   :rant: :doh: :smh: :spaz: :hang: :bag: :bang: :hang:

Online PC

  • Posts: 40043
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #130: August 12, 2010, 10:54:11 PM »
This series = EPIC FAIL

Offline sportsfan882

  • Posts: 85278
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #131: August 12, 2010, 10:54:53 PM »
You could see it in Dunn's eyes right before Nolasco threw that pitch. He knew he was cooked.

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 53295
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #132: August 12, 2010, 10:55:19 PM »
:UMD batsignal:  The offense is fixed!


Online spidernat

  • Posts: 53295
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #133: August 12, 2010, 10:55:56 PM »
You could see it in Dunn's eyes right before Nolasco threw that pitch. He knew he was cooked.

:lmao:

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33589
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #134: August 12, 2010, 10:58:45 PM »
:lmao:

The camera never left the mound.

Apparently ASSCLOWN has super vision that could see into Dunn's eyes.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #135: August 12, 2010, 10:59:18 PM »
The camera never left the mound.

Apparently ASSCLOWN has super vision that could see into Dunn's eyes.

He's in the stadium crouching in the dugout.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27625
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #136: August 12, 2010, 11:01:00 PM »
6-3, a quality start.

So, what happens if he ends up 7-4, does that undo the previously earned QS?

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11602
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #137: August 12, 2010, 11:01:35 PM »

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33589
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #138: August 12, 2010, 11:02:06 PM »
6-3, a quality start.

So, what happens if he ends up 7-4, does that undo the previously earned QS?

What game are you talking about?

But yes, any game where you give up more than three earned runs does not end up a quality start.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37010
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday

Offline NatsAddict

  • Posts: 4095
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #140: August 12, 2010, 11:03:24 PM »
6-3, a quality start.

So, what happens if he ends up 7-4, does that undo the previously earned QS?

Yes it would.  Even at 9-4, with a better game ERA, he'd still lose the QS.

Offline Coladar

  • Posts: 2808
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #141: August 12, 2010, 11:03:33 PM »
He's in the stadium crouching in the dugout.

Since I'm in the front row behind our dugout... I thought I heard someone yelling "Elijah, where are you?" Glad it wasn't just my imagination.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33589
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #142: August 12, 2010, 11:03:38 PM »
Hey Morse, he's going offspeed, off the plate.

Offline tomterp

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 27625
  • Hell yes!
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #143: August 12, 2010, 11:05:51 PM »
What game are you talking about?

But yes, any game where you give up more than three earned runs does not end up a quality start.

This one, of course.  Livan's pitched 6 innings, 3 runs.  If he quit now it's a QS. 

What if you go 9-4, is that a QS?  That's better than a 6-3, more innings with a lower ERA.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33589
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #144: August 12, 2010, 11:06:08 PM »
I'd love for the Nats to sign Lee.

It'd make my day.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40043
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #145: August 12, 2010, 11:06:09 PM »
The Lerners can afford 6-years, 120 million for Lee!

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33589
  • Lets go to work
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #146: August 12, 2010, 11:06:43 PM »
This one, of course.  Livan's pitched 6 innings, 3 runs.  If he quit now it's a QS.  

What if you go 9-4, is that a QS?  That's better than a 6-3, more innings with a lower ERA.

OH. I thought you said the score was 6-3.

No, anytime you go over three earned runs in a game, no matter how many innings you go... it no longer counts as a QS.

Offline NatsAddict

  • Posts: 4095
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #147: August 12, 2010, 11:06:50 PM »
6-3, a quality start.

So, what happens if he ends up 7-4, does that undo the previously earned QS?

What's worse is Harvey Haddix losing a perfect game in he 13th.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40043
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #148: August 12, 2010, 11:07:23 PM »
This front office is constantly trying to sign an "innings eater".  Wouldn't it be nice to get one who's actually good?

Online spidernat

  • Posts: 53295
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals vs Marlins, Game 3
« Reply #149: August 12, 2010, 11:08:25 PM »


This one, of course.  Livan's pitched 6 innings, 3 runs.  If he quit now it's a QS. 

What if you go 9-4, is that a QS?  That's better than a 6-3, more innings with a lower ERA.

True but you cannot yield more than 3 runs and still be credited with a QS. That only illustrates the futility of the stat. It's only meant to give pitchers credit for doing as little as possible.