Poll

Sign Guillen?

Yes
7 (35%)
No
13 (65%)

Total Members Voted: 14

Voting closed: August 29, 2006, 11:27:45 AM

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sign Guillen?  (Read 4520 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18063
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #25: August 29, 2006, 06:05:40 PM »
Once again, where will he play?
RF? What about Kearns? Move him to CF? I don't know. I'd rather try to make him as comfortable as possible.
CF? I figured Church would start the year.
LF? Could be Soriano, I'd rather have Casto.
Logged

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9422
  • Through Fick and Zim
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #26: August 29, 2006, 06:10:28 PM »
Quote from: "Nats19"
Once again, where will he play?
RF? What about Kearns? Move him to CF? I don't know. I'd rather try to make him as comfortable as possible.
CF? I figured Church would start the year.
LF? Could be Soriano, I'd rather have Casto.


You'd rather have Casto than Soriano?  BS.
Logged

Offline Kenz aFan

  • Posts: 5443
  • Just a fan
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #27: August 30, 2006, 10:58:59 AM »
I wouldn't even resign Guillen as a bench player. He's proven to be more a Major League Mouth than anything else. What I dislike most about him, is that even after seeing a much lighter player like Soriano pop dingers left and right out of RFK, he still whimpers about the fences beign to far. He can always go back to playing Little League and see if he can hit out over a 200 foot fence.
Logged

Offline expos96

  • Posts: 1722
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #28: August 30, 2006, 11:54:06 AM »
I would sign him a contract which comes in effect as he can get into the team.
But if I had to choose between Guillen and Daryle, I would choose Daryle.
Logged

Offline 2k6nats

  • Posts: 9422
  • Through Fick and Zim
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #29: August 30, 2006, 11:56:09 AM »
Quote from: "expos96"
I would sign him a contract which comes in effect as he can get into the team.
But if I had to choose between Guillen and Daryle, I would choose Daryle.


Daryle is a great PH, lets leave him at that.
Logged

Offline ColtonWillems

  • Posts: 1125
  • "You have no integrity"
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #30: August 30, 2006, 11:56:31 AM »
Quote from: "2k6nats"
Quote from: "Nats19"
Once again, where will he play?
RF? What about Kearns? Move him to CF? I don't know. I'd rather try to make him as comfortable as possible.
CF? I figured Church would start the year.
LF? Could be Soriano, I'd rather have Casto.


You'd rather have Casto than Soriano?  BS.


I would rather Casto also, because if Soriano isn't there, it means we have some extra money to do some Minor League Advancements or upgrade the pitching.

As for Guillen, get him the **** out of here.
Logged

Offline expos96

  • Posts: 1722
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #31: August 30, 2006, 12:51:35 PM »
Quote from: "2k6nats"
Quote from: "expos96"
I would sign him a contract which comes in effect as he can get into the team.
But if I had to choose between Guillen and Daryle, I would choose Daryle.


Daryle is a great PH, lets leave him at that.


Hmm I forgotten the mention the role of bench player-ph.
 :oops:

But I also think Daryle can play more than ph.
Outfield and 1B.
Logged

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #32: August 30, 2006, 01:30:32 PM »
Absolutely not. His downside heavily outweighs any positives he may bring to the table. You can't get rid of this guy soon enough.
Logged

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 18063
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #33: August 30, 2006, 05:16:02 PM »
Quote from: "2k6nats"
Quote from: "Nats19"
Once again, where will he play?
RF? What about Kearns? Move him to CF? I don't know. I'd rather try to make him as comfortable as possible.
CF? I figured Church would start the year.
LF? Could be Soriano, I'd rather have Casto.


You'd rather have Casto than Soriano?  BS.


It's simple really. Casto is through with the minors by the end of the year (if he proves he can handle the MLB). I'd rather have the 2 more 1st round picks to be honest.

Nats fans need to move on - we're probably not going to sign Soriano, and I think we don't need to.
Logged

Offline Nat of the Living Dead

  • Posts: 16790
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #34: August 30, 2006, 05:18:01 PM »
Quote from: "Nats19"
Quote from: "2k6nats"
Quote from: "Nats19"
Once again, where will he play?
RF? What about Kearns? Move him to CF? I don't know. I'd rather try to make him as comfortable as possible.
CF? I figured Church would start the year.
LF? Could be Soriano, I'd rather have Casto.


You'd rather have Casto than Soriano?  BS.


It's simple really. Casto is through with the minors by the end of the year (if he proves he can handle the MLB). I'd rather have the 2 more 1st round picks to be honest.

Nats fans need to move on - we're probably not going to sign Soriano, and I think we don't need to.


Yep.
Logged

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11345
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Sign Guillen?
« Reply #35: August 30, 2006, 07:41:18 PM »
Good Riddance, Guillen.

I don't want any players who do not enjoy playing at Home and profess to the public how much he looks forward to going on the road to play.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up