Author Topic: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3  (Read 2943 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #125: June 30, 2010, 08:28:24 PM »
freak you Atlanta

Online The Chief

  • Posts: 30107
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #126: June 30, 2010, 08:28:42 PM »
Haha, good job idiot Atlanta fan.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54355
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #127: June 30, 2010, 08:28:51 PM »
J.D. Martin is awesome

Will there ever be a time when we're completely rid of AAA garbage?

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #128: June 30, 2010, 08:29:01 PM »
Did dibble miss the orioles series? When have we really been down by 5 or 6 early since the tigers series

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54355
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #129: June 30, 2010, 08:29:47 PM »
For what other team is the 2nd run given up, the back breaker?   :icon_frown:

Oftentimes it feels like the first run is a back breaker.

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #130: June 30, 2010, 08:29:59 PM »
So. What can we do with this lineup to get our offense back? Dunn third? etc etc?

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #131: June 30, 2010, 08:29:59 PM »
Why would a fan do that? He's going to be escorted out of the park now.

Offline Evolution33

  • Posts: 5093
    • Blown Save, Win
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #132: June 30, 2010, 08:30:09 PM »
Will there ever be a time when we're completely rid of AAA garbage?

No. But hopefully it is a fifth starter due to injury

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #133: June 30, 2010, 08:30:15 PM »
The Taco Bell girls replaced Mercury girl. Not fair.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54355
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #134: June 30, 2010, 08:30:45 PM »
So. What can we do with this lineup to get our offense back? Dunn third? etc etc?

With this lineup nothing. Riggleman has too many defective tools in his toolbag.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54355
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #135: June 30, 2010, 08:31:17 PM »
The Taco Bell girls replaced Mercury girl. Not fair.

WTF! I didn't get that commercial either. Are they hot?

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8758
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #136: June 30, 2010, 08:31:25 PM »
So. What can we do with this lineup to get our offense back? Dunn third? etc etc?
Riggs still hasn't done the names in a hat trick.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40860
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #137: June 30, 2010, 08:31:42 PM »
There's no sense of urgency with this team. 

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54355
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #138: June 30, 2010, 08:32:08 PM »
No. But hopefully it is a fifth starter due to injury

That's all right because it's spot starts. But we have way too many AAAA garbage pitching on a regular basis. But they're cheaper.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #139: June 30, 2010, 08:32:38 PM »
WTF! I didn't get that commercial either. Are they hot?

The blond girl is prettier than anyone coming for conjugal visits to your block.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #140: June 30, 2010, 08:33:47 PM »
Not fair that Jurrjens got an out because the batter was worried about him.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54355
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #141: June 30, 2010, 08:34:41 PM »
The blond girl is prettier than anyone coming for conjugal visits to your block.




I know which one you're talking about now. I was getting some watermelon during the break and missed it. I backed it up and saw the two chicks with the one hiding a taco in her purse. They're not as hot as the Mercury chick.

Offline GburgNatsFan

  • Posts: 12626
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #142: June 30, 2010, 08:35:51 PM »
C'mon, Spidernat. It was a chalupa.

I've had a girl hide her taco *with* a purse, but not in it.

(Image removed from quote.)

I know which one you're talking about now. I was getting some watermelon during the break and missed it. I backed it up and saw the two chicks with the one hiding a taco in her purse. They're not as hot as the Mercury chick.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #143: June 30, 2010, 08:35:54 PM »
I'd let him hit, he's better than Nyjer currently

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #144: June 30, 2010, 08:36:08 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

I know which one you're talking about now. I was getting some watermelon during the break and missed it. I backed it up and saw the two chicks with the one hiding a taco in her purse. They're not as hot as the Mercury chick.


I know that's why I complained.

Keep hitting these comebackers and we'll score a run.

Online PC

  • Posts: 40860
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #145: June 30, 2010, 08:37:00 PM »
Now we're stuck with Nyjer Morgan, so that bunt does no good.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #146: June 30, 2010, 08:37:01 PM »
Come on Nyjer, a single scores 2

Offline ghostface

  • Posts: 1052
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #147: June 30, 2010, 08:37:03 PM »
i'd rather have jd hit than nyjer

Online PC

  • Posts: 40860
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #148: June 30, 2010, 08:37:28 PM »
There is no way Morgan comes through!

Offline EdStroud

  • Posts: 8758
Re: Nationals @ Braves, Game 3
« Reply #149: June 30, 2010, 08:38:01 PM »
RaJa time