Author Topic: Bright Spots on the Nats  (Read 3016 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #25: June 21, 2010, 12:40:57 PM »
The stars and stripes "DC" ones?

Yeah I think it's really sharp. I like the bold blue and the DC logo.

Online DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22115
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #26: June 21, 2010, 12:44:26 PM »
Yeah I think it's really sharp. I like the bold blue and the DC logo.
Yeah, I like the blue, but I still am not a huge fan of the stars and stripes DC part.  Personal preference, I guess.  I think a blue Curly W alternate for on the road would be a home run though. 

Online Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 19647
  • #DCU
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #27: June 21, 2010, 12:50:59 PM »
Honestly I'd be happy if they just made the red alternates the permanent home uni.

I think there's a uniform code that states each team shall have home white uniforms and that any colors other than white or grey are considered "alternates" and each team can only wear alternates a certain amount of times per year (home or away).  Can't recall where I read that but I'll see if I can dig it up.

EDIT:

From the MLB Official Rules:

Quote
1.11
(a) (1) All players on a team shall wear uniforms identical in color, trim and style, and all players uniforms shall include minimal six-inch numbers on their backs.
     (2) Any part of an undershirt exposed to view shall be of a uniform solid color for all players on a team. Any player other than the pitcher may have numbers, letters, insignia attached to the sleeve of the undershirt.
     (3) No player whose uniform does not conform to that of his teammates shall be permitted to participate in a game.
(b) A league may provide that
     (1) each team shall wear a distinctive uniform at all times, or
     (2) that each team shall have two sets of uniforms, white for home games and a different color for road games.
(c) (1) Sleeve lengths may vary for individual players, but the sleeves of each individual player shall be approximately the same length.
     (2) No player shall wear ragged, frayed or slit sleeves.
(d) No player shall attach to his uniform tape or other material of a different color from his uniform.
(e) No part of the uniform shall include a pattern that imitates or suggests the shape of a baseball.
(f) Glass buttons and polished metal shall not be used on a uniform.
(g) No player shall attach anything to the heel or toe of his shoe other than the ordinary shoe plate or toe plate. Shoes with pointed spikes similar to golf or track shoes shall not be worn.
(h) No part of the uniform shall include patches or designs relating to commercial advertisements.
(i) A league may provide that the uniforms of its member teams include the names of its players on their backs. Any name other than the last name of the player must be approved by the League President. If adopted, all uniforms for a team must have the names of its players.

Source:  MLB.com

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #28: June 21, 2010, 02:24:05 PM »
Yeah, and the Brewers logo violates that rule. Oops, did Selig own that team?

Online Minty Fresh

  • Posts: 19647
  • #DCU
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #29: June 21, 2010, 02:46:07 PM »
Yeah, and the Brewers logo violates that rule. Oops, did Selig own that team?

What rule do the Brewer uniforms violate?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #30: June 21, 2010, 02:48:09 PM »
What rule do the Brewer uniforms violate?






part e

Online DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22115
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #31: June 21, 2010, 03:01:36 PM »
Yeah, and the Brewers logo violates that rule. Oops, did Selig own that team?
Brewers don't wear that logo on the field.  It's just the brewers script and the M as far as I can tell.

The Dodgers, Red Sox, Mariners, Marlins, Mets, Twins, Rangers, Royals, Giants, Rockies and Nats all have a ball incorporated into their corporate logo, but don't wear them on the field.

Offline aspenbubba

  • Posts: 4235
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #32: June 21, 2010, 03:11:14 PM »
When I saw the title of this thread I immediately thought of the joke about the series of books entitled "The thinnest book of ...........".

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #33: June 21, 2010, 03:24:15 PM »
Brewers don't wear that logo on the field.  It's just the brewers script and the M as far as I can tell.

The Dodgers, Red Sox, Mariners, Marlins, Mets, Twins, Rangers, Royals, Giants, Rockies and Nats all have a ball incorporated into their corporate logo, but don't wear them on the field.





It's not a big deal, but another straw on the camel's back for Selig.

Offline Galah

  • Posts: 2850
  • 2016 - the year that everything changed, again.
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #34: June 21, 2010, 04:10:49 PM »
[quote ]
   (3) No player whose uniform does not conform to that of his teammates shall be permitted to participate in a game.
[/quote]

Hmmm so last years game with Zimmereman and Dunn as NATINALS never really happened?

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 12508
  • Troll So Hard University
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #35: June 21, 2010, 10:12:36 PM »
Michael Morse.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #36: June 21, 2010, 10:46:42 PM »
Pudge turned this team around again. Sweet game for him.

Sounded like Nyjer made a really good play.

Capps has a high gear that is awesome.

Livo being Livo.

Online DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22115
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #37: June 21, 2010, 10:48:49 PM »
The front office having the ballz to send down Lannan.

Offline Galah

  • Posts: 2850
  • 2016 - the year that everything changed, again.
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #38: June 21, 2010, 11:54:39 PM »
A triple yesterday and a HR tonight, sure am gonna be sorry to see Guzman go, but the WNFF has spoken

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #39: June 22, 2010, 07:39:59 AM »
The front office having the ballz to send down Lannan.
This times infinity!
Did anyone seriously expect this to happen? This is another sign of a real major league ball club.

Offline Kevrock

  • Posts: 12508
  • Troll So Hard University
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #40: June 22, 2010, 08:32:38 AM »
This times infinity!
Did anyone seriously expect this to happen? This is another sign of a real major league ball club.

I thought it was inevitable the way he was pitching.

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 19039
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #41: June 23, 2010, 12:00:04 AM »
The entire bullpen.

Since May 17, the bullpen has an ERA of 2.51. (Zuckerman)

Offline Galah

  • Posts: 2850
  • 2016 - the year that everything changed, again.
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #42: June 23, 2010, 12:01:43 AM »

c-a-p-p-s  Capps, Capps, Capps!

Offline Ali the Baseball Cat

  • Posts: 14813
  • babble on
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #43: June 23, 2010, 12:36:38 AM »
But Caesar can change his mind!

A triple yesterday and a HR tonight, sure am gonna be sorry to see Guzman go, but the WNFF has spoken

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #44: June 23, 2010, 12:46:09 AM »
Pitching, pitching, pitching, and Dunn.

Zimmy remembered how to hit!

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #45: June 27, 2010, 11:26:38 AM »
The pen. Walker, Peralta, yes Burnett, the back of the pen is reliable. Batista won't be here next year, but Walker can take his role and then you can keep a surprising guy like Peralta for instance. I wonder who goes down when the next starter comes up, I think Peralta has to go through waivers.

Dunn can hit. Flat out hit.

Guzman had a nice a day at the plate without getting a hit :lol:

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30670
  • it's a thumb
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #46: June 27, 2010, 11:38:43 AM »
Guzman had a nice a day at the plate without getting a hit :lol:

No, he sucks, awful, terrible.  He's only allowed to be "okay" if he has a 5-for-5 day, and even then he's slap-happy unless he hits 3 homers.  And even then, he should've taken more walks.

:? :roll:

Offline blue911

  • Posts: 17780
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #47: June 27, 2010, 11:54:32 AM »
No, he sucks, awful, terrible.  He's only allowed to be "okay" if he has a 5-for-5 day, and even then he's slap-happy unless he hits 3 homers.  And even then, he should've taken more walks.

:? :roll:


He didn't cure cancer, so he's lazy.

Online JCA-CrystalCity

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 25709
  • Platoon - not just a movie, a baseball obsession
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #48: June 27, 2010, 05:47:41 PM »
No, he sucks, awful, terrible.  He's only allowed to be "okay" if he has a 5-for-5 day, and even then he's slap-happy unless he hits 3 homers.  And even then, he should've taken more walks.

:? :roll:
Last I saw, oil was still coming up all over the place in the Gulf. WTF is he doing!

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37395
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Bright Spots on the Nats
« Reply #49: June 27, 2010, 05:52:28 PM »
Today, Atilano didn't collapse after a 3 running inning (2 earned).

I think that's all I got. No more interleague and no more awful combined announce teams.