Author Topic: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3  (Read 2683 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 27091
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #125: June 06, 2010, 03:12:02 PM »
Can we expect a football 'o lin?

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41238
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #126: June 06, 2010, 03:12:59 PM »
Did I hear this was a double switch?

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 27091
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #127: June 06, 2010, 03:13:03 PM »
NSO violin player. Tuned it himself, put in the pickups. He's a fixture now, and deservedly so. Teaches kids how music can be cool, for one thing. Sounds great, for another.

Music is cool.   Started when I was twelve with instruments of one kind or another.    Fifty years ago ...

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33916
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #128: June 06, 2010, 03:13:06 PM »
I think you keep Stammen over Atilano.  His peripherals are so much better and he's a better all-around pitcher.  Atilano is mediocre, Stammen is unlucky.  They're both due for an adjustment and I want the guy with upside to stay in the rotation.

Agreed.

Atilano and his 5 wins reminds me of Martis from last year.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #129: June 06, 2010, 03:13:16 PM »
I think you keep Stammen over Atilano.  His peripherals are so much better and he's a better all-around pitcher.  Atilano is mediocre, Stammen is unlucky.  They're both due for an adjustment and I want the guy with upside to stay in the rotation.

1st rounders tend to have upside :roll: Atilano has some tricky pitches.

Offline Grandstander

  • Posts: 207
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #130: June 06, 2010, 03:13:24 PM »
SOMEONE WAS WEARING NATIONALS HULK HANDS! Is that real product or were they homemade? ME WANT!

They're definitely sold at the stadium.  I think in the program stands.  They need a cupholder so you can drink with it.

Offline Neuman

  • Posts: 139
    • Washington Nationals Examiner
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #131: June 06, 2010, 03:14:02 PM »
http://bit.ly/9qGsX3

Get ready for Harper - Rizzo says its a lock

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #132: June 06, 2010, 03:14:07 PM »
They're definitely sold at the stadium.  I think in the program stands.  They need a cupholder so you can drink with it.

Guy was holding a beer bottle with it.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 27091
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #133: June 06, 2010, 03:14:10 PM »
When the rain comes they run and hide their heads.

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41238
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #134: June 06, 2010, 03:15:11 PM »
I don't know why they were being so coy about drafting Harper.  It's not like they can trade the pick.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 27091
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #135: June 06, 2010, 03:15:45 PM »
I don't know why they were being so coy about drafting Harper.  It's not like they can trade the pick.

Didn't sound like Rizzo was coy at all.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33916
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #136: June 06, 2010, 03:15:56 PM »
Come on Wil. If you can't hit you have to at least be able to bunt!

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 18349
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #137: June 06, 2010, 03:15:57 PM »
http://bit.ly/9qGsX3

Get ready for Harper - Rizzo says its a lock
That's not actually what he said. 

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 27091
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #138: June 06, 2010, 03:16:41 PM »
Good as a bunt ...

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41238
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #139: June 06, 2010, 03:17:20 PM »
Didn't sound like Rizzo was coy at all.

They were up until now.  They could have just said they were going to draft Harper, weeks ago.  There was no reason to not say it.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33916
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #140: June 06, 2010, 03:17:40 PM »
Lets go Willie!!!

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #141: June 06, 2010, 03:17:42 PM »
That's not actually what he said. 

I think if you don't hedge then it could be binding. I dunno.

Online mitlen

  • Posts: 27091
  • Bullets fever !!
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #142: June 06, 2010, 03:17:47 PM »
They were up until now.  They could have just said they were going to draft Harper, weeks ago.  There was no reason to not say it.

Agree ..

Offline houston-nat

  • Posts: 16518
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #143: June 06, 2010, 03:17:59 PM »
Why Willie Harris? Why not Adam Kennedy?

Offline Neuman

  • Posts: 139
    • Washington Nationals Examiner
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #144: June 06, 2010, 03:18:03 PM »
I don't know why they were being so coy about drafting Harper.  It's not like they can trade the pick.

Yeah, but the Boras factor changes everything.  Announcing that pick two months ago wouldve driven the price up

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41238
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #145: June 06, 2010, 03:18:15 PM »
This was a terrible decision by Riggleman.  Terrible all the way around.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37068
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #146: June 06, 2010, 03:18:20 PM »
Harper could blow out his knee tripping on a curb. It's good to wait, I think.

Offline Neuman

  • Posts: 139
    • Washington Nationals Examiner
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #147: June 06, 2010, 03:18:34 PM »
Why Willie Harris? Why not Adam Kennedy?

You are lucky JCA and the Chieft arent here....

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41238
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #148: June 06, 2010, 03:18:47 PM »
Yeah, but the Boras factor changes everything.  Announcing that pick two months ago wouldve driven the price up

How so?

Offline Grandstander

  • Posts: 207
Re: Nationals vs Reds, Game 3
« Reply #149: June 06, 2010, 03:19:25 PM »
They were up until now.  They could have just said they were going to draft Harper, weeks ago.  There was no reason to not say it.

You don't want to give up any leverage in a negotiation.  Saying you're going to draft him weeks ahead of time says that you think no one else even comes close to being as good as him.  Even if it's for show, you can't give an inch.  Obviously we're drafting Harper, I never doubted it for a second.