Author Topic: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2  (Read 3112 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #275: May 29, 2010, 10:43:16 PM »
Dude check again, I'm actually losing.

Aha, so you want Debbi to think you are cool?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #276: May 29, 2010, 10:44:22 PM »

Online PC

  • Posts: 41574
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #277: May 29, 2010, 10:45:27 PM »
It would be 2-1, Rob.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #278: May 29, 2010, 10:45:28 PM »
Ok lets get to fatty

Online Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33991
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #279: May 29, 2010, 10:45:40 PM »
I wouldn't care if Nyjer was just not hitting.

But his crappy fielding, terrible base running and brain locks make him worthless to the club.

If he goes back to playing within himself, he'll be fine.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 18098
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #280: May 29, 2010, 10:45:45 PM »
do you mean inverse?

yeah, sorry, too much time in the sun today. :-)

Most teams are lucky to have one or two guys who can close, the Padres have three.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #281: May 29, 2010, 10:46:36 PM »
I am still unable to let go the fact that broadcast time was dedicated to a report about a bbq at a hotel. Unreal.

Offline imref

  • Posts: 18098
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #282: May 29, 2010, 10:46:44 PM »
The three 3 NBA fans left are psyched.

I would have watched the finals if Nash & Co. made it. 

Offline imref

  • Posts: 18098
  • 1B: The New Hot Corner
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #283: May 29, 2010, 10:47:21 PM »
I am still unable to let go the fact that broadcast time was dedicated to a report about a bbq at a hotel. Unreal.

It would have been better to show her bender last night in Tijuana.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #284: May 29, 2010, 10:47:59 PM »
Quick game.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41574
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #285: May 29, 2010, 10:48:07 PM »
That wasn't close to strike!

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #286: May 29, 2010, 10:48:16 PM »
WTF Ump? Took a laxative or something? Boiling an egg?

Online PC

  • Posts: 41574
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #287: May 29, 2010, 10:48:26 PM »
That was more of a strike than the other one.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #288: May 29, 2010, 10:48:32 PM »
That should've been a walk!  >:(

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #289: May 29, 2010, 10:49:15 PM »
Ok Roger. Touch em all.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #290: May 29, 2010, 10:49:15 PM »
I freaking lost.  :bang:

The umpire denied the push by that bad strike call.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41574
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #291: May 29, 2010, 10:49:16 PM »
We should protest this game!

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #292: May 29, 2010, 10:49:23 PM »
I wouldn't care if Nyjer was just not hitting.

But his crappy fielding, terrible base running and brain locks make him worthless to the club.

If he goes back to playing within himself, he'll be fine.

Someone explain who the freak were going to place in his spot. Hes had three bone head plays the past couple weeks. It sucks but I'm not jumping the gun on him yet. Plus, if he was batting better he'd get on base more to raise that average. He has something mentally wrong with him but I still believe he'll turn it around in June. Id rather stick with him then put anyone else out there.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #293: May 29, 2010, 10:49:35 PM »
I freaking lost.  :bang:

50 posts in 5 days isn't that rough.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #294: May 29, 2010, 10:50:13 PM »
I have a feel Bell has been shopping at KRoger.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #295: May 29, 2010, 10:50:17 PM »
50 posts in 5 days isn't that rough.

It's 40.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #296: May 29, 2010, 10:50:43 PM »

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54704
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #297: May 29, 2010, 10:51:13 PM »
Plus, if he was batting better he'd get on base more to raise that average.

If Bruney had recorded more outs he would've been more effective. We should've kept him around.  :?

Online PC

  • Posts: 41574
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #298: May 29, 2010, 10:51:37 PM »
Someone explain who the freak were going to place in his spot. Hes had three bone head plays the past couple weeks. It sucks but I'm not jumping the gun on him yet. Plus, if he was batting better he'd get on base more to raise that average. He has something mentally wrong with him but I still believe he'll turn it around in June. Id rather stick with him then put anyone else out there.

Why do you think he'll get better in June?

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37074
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Padres, Game 2
« Reply #299: May 29, 2010, 10:51:51 PM »
If Bruney had recorded more outs he would've been more effective. We should've kept him around.  :?

That was a Debbi of a post.