Author Topic: Nationals @ Rockies, Game 3  (Read 2722 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Nationals @ Rockies, Game 3
« Topic Start: May 15, 2010, 07:37:40 PM »
Game Time: 8:10 PM (ET)
Venue: Coors Field
TV: MASN2 HD
Radio: WFED 1500, SBN 1390

Nationals
(20-16)  


Luis Atilano                                                    
3-0, 3.57                                                    

     

Morgan CF
Harris LF
Zimmerman 3B
Dunn 1B
Guzman 2B
Bernadina RF
Desmond SS
Nieves C
Atilano P


Rockies
(17-18)


Jason Hamel
0-2, 9.16



Gonzalez Cf
Smith LF
Hawpe RF
Tulowitzki SS
Helton 1B
Stewart 3B
Barmes 2B
Phillips C
Hammel P


                               

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #1: May 15, 2010, 07:42:07 PM »
spidernat ftw ... we'll win tonight 4-2

Offline cmdterps44

  • Posts: 15536
  • Future
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #2: May 15, 2010, 07:48:27 PM »
Oh Farris is playing!

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14321
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #3: May 15, 2010, 07:48:51 PM »
Oh great, it's Phil Wood :spaz:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10679
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #5: May 15, 2010, 07:53:07 PM »
Atilano is not 0-2, he's 3-0, 3.57 ERA

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #6: May 15, 2010, 07:55:19 PM »
Atilano is not 0-2, he's 3-0, 3.57 ERA

I accidentally copied the wrong record for Atilano.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)

Offline PC

  • Posts: 41017
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #8: May 15, 2010, 08:04:11 PM »
We need to get to Hammel fast!

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #9: May 15, 2010, 08:07:02 PM »
Probably thanks to Riggleman's early hook, I'm free of the bet :woop:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #10: May 15, 2010, 08:07:35 PM »
We need to get to Hammel fast!

yeah ... he's a bit inconsistent ... i like our chances, our guys hit jimenez pretty hard and had him in jams most of the day.  their confidence should be up after the first two games of this series.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #11: May 15, 2010, 08:08:07 PM »
Probably thanks to Riggleman's early hook, I'm free of the bet :woop:

what was the bet again?  i want details.  i was too drunk and too lazy to look it up the other day.   8)

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #12: May 15, 2010, 08:09:22 PM »
I'm too lazy to detail the original bet and followup bet, but the "last chance" bet was either Livo gets a QS today or the Nats O hangs 4 or more on Jiminez.  I think it's pretty obvious which one I took.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #13: May 15, 2010, 08:10:45 PM »
haha nice.

random thought ... but i love seeing norris/burgess as 3/4 hitters for potomac :az:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #14: May 15, 2010, 08:10:47 PM »
Probably thanks to Riggleman's early hook, I'm free of the bet :woop:

If you want to lower the standards and count that as a quality start.  :?

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #15: May 15, 2010, 08:12:36 PM »
If you want to lower the standards and count that as a quality start.  :?

You said quality start - that's an established stat...  was I supposed to read your mind?  I'll change it back if you want :shrug:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #16: May 15, 2010, 08:13:52 PM »
You said quality start - that's an established stat...  was I supposed to read your mind?  I'll change it back if you want :shrug:

No I'm just messing with you Chief.  :lmao:  Hernandez wasn't his best today but he still gave us a shot to win. However, the next plea bargain HAS to involve Bruney.  :lol:

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #17: May 15, 2010, 08:15:11 PM »
damnit farris

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #18: May 15, 2010, 08:20:15 PM »
I was really hoping that by not following the first game, Nats would pull out a win somehow.  I'm nervous about this game.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #19: May 15, 2010, 08:22:27 PM »
I can't listen to Bob Carpenter, sometimes he's just the worst.  He's been better this year, but still, ehhhhhh.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #20: May 15, 2010, 08:22:49 PM »
Did you guys get to see Dunn's bomb?   :shock:

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 54502
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #21: May 15, 2010, 08:24:08 PM »
I thought what Carpenter is describing was not up to the teams but is regulated by MLB.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33835
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #22: May 15, 2010, 08:24:45 PM »
Not looking good for Luis.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #23: May 15, 2010, 08:25:00 PM »
not this crap again

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Rockies, game 3
« Reply #24: May 15, 2010, 08:25:16 PM »
Did you guys get to see Dunn's bomb?   :shock:

His swing was so effortless.  The Rockies announcers were so dry :lol:

I thought what Carpenter is describing was not up to the teams but is regulated by MLB.

It should be.