Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3  (Read 19516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #300: May 12, 2010, 03:29:49 PM »
Or he'll do them a favor by striking himself out :?

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #301: May 12, 2010, 03:30:17 PM »
these are going to be the worst back-to-back losses of the year

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #302: May 12, 2010, 03:30:28 PM »
Why is Zimmerman always anti-clutch?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #303: May 12, 2010, 03:30:50 PM »
these are going to be the worst back-to-back losses of the year

Still time to accept my bet challenge.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #304: May 12, 2010, 03:31:49 PM »
Still time to accept my bet challenge.

What are the terms?  I'll take the bet.  No way the Nats win with 4 IP of this bullpen.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #305: May 12, 2010, 03:31:58 PM »
Want to see something funny?


Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #306: May 12, 2010, 03:32:46 PM »
What are the terms?  I'll take the bet.  No way the Nats win with 4 IP of this bullpen.

I was thinking the Rockies series (no posting or moderating :lol:) that the Nats win this ballgame.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #307: May 12, 2010, 03:33:12 PM »
I was thinking the Rockies series (no posting or moderating :lol:) that the Nats win this ballgame.

You know I can't do the latter but I'll take the former.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #308: May 12, 2010, 03:33:19 PM »
Erik Arnesen making a spot start (or maybe they are moving him back to the rotation): 6 ip, 3 h, bb, 5 k.  He is 1-2 with a 2.43 ERA.

Espinosa and Marrero both with two hits today ... Espinosa went yard for his 2nd homer and had a double (he also had 3 rbi's and a stolen base). 

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #309: May 12, 2010, 03:33:45 PM »
Barajajajajajajajas :lmao:

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #310: May 12, 2010, 03:33:50 PM »
Why is Zimmerman always anti-clutch?
This is the same guy referred to as Mr. walk-off, right? Also the one who came through with a walk-off homer in the first game at Nats Park?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #311: May 12, 2010, 03:34:41 PM »
Want to see something funny?



LOL Remember the commercial she made where she said Ortega always makes her taco pop?  :lmao:

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #312: May 12, 2010, 03:35:24 PM »
Want to see something funny?


It's probably a top 15 all-time bad first pitch.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37394
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #313: May 12, 2010, 03:36:05 PM »
let's trade brian bruney for nolan reimold ... two young pieces that are struggling for their respective teams

Offline PC

  • Posts: 47236
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #314: May 12, 2010, 03:36:12 PM »
Why WOULD Riggleman pinch hit, Gonzalez when Desmond and Willingham were available?

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #315: May 12, 2010, 03:36:36 PM »
LOL Remember the commercial she made where she said Ortega always makes her taco pop?  :lmao:
This one?

Offline Salamander Man

  • Posts: 316
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #316: May 12, 2010, 03:36:59 PM »
The team is going to get like 1 more opportunity to PH. Why are you saving both of them if there is 1 spot open?

Do I need to remind you Guzman, Bernadina, and Nieves are in the lineup?

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #317: May 12, 2010, 03:37:06 PM »
This is the same guy referred to as Mr. walk-off, right? Also the one who came through with a walk-off homer in the first game at Nats Park?

Let me rephrase it so it is technically correct; Why is Zimmerman always anti-clutch when there is no walk-off possibility?

Offline CJames0569

  • Posts: 1698
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #318: May 12, 2010, 03:37:22 PM »
Why WOULD Riggleman pinch hit, Gonzalez when Desmond and Willingham were available?

As mentioned earlier he is saving Willingham and Desmond for the later innings. Why would you waste a PH with 2 outs and bases empty?

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #319: May 12, 2010, 03:37:29 PM »
You know I can't do the latter but I'll take the former.

Dunn.  :lol:

Offline Salamander Man

  • Posts: 316
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #320: May 12, 2010, 03:37:33 PM »
let's trade brian bruney for nolan reimold ... two young pieces that are struggling for their respective teams

That would be a steal.  Do it O's.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 31799
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #321: May 12, 2010, 03:37:50 PM »
Might be able to get 2 IP out of Burnett

Offline NatsDad14

  • Posts: 5241
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #322: May 12, 2010, 03:38:15 PM »
Do I need to remind you Guzman, Bernadina, and Nieves are in the lineup?

Guzman is not leaving the game. Nieves would get pinch hit by Pudge. Willingham pinch hits for Bernadina. Desmond pinch hits in the 6th inning. Not that hard.

Offline DPMOmaha

  • Posts: 22875
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #323: May 12, 2010, 03:38:20 PM »
I'm up for Burnett starting the 7th.

Offline spidernat

  • Posts: 76956
  • The Lerners are Cheap AND Crooked
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 3
« Reply #324: May 12, 2010, 03:38:23 PM »
This one?

Yeah that one. Her parents should've fired her publicist/agent. 

Morgan almost freaked that up.