Author Topic: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2  (Read 5835 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #825: May 11, 2010, 10:49:02 PM »
Whoa, that is dark, man.


It's not the first time that opinion has been voiced on this board.  And statistically he's probably right.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33835
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #826: May 11, 2010, 10:49:15 PM »
Whoa, that is dark, man.


It's true.

I'm beyond done with Bruney.

Offline KnorrForYourMoney

  • Posts: 14321
  • Nats hitters = Maggie Lizer
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #827: May 11, 2010, 10:49:47 PM »
I guess it makes sense to put Storen in now.

The chances are he probably won't be around when he finally ends arbitration due to the fact that bullpen guys burn out so fast... so Super 2 probably won't apply to him.

Exactly, plus it stacks the deck for Strasburg not qualifying for S2 if we call him up for the Baltimore series

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11802

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #830: May 11, 2010, 10:51:11 PM »


JAIL!

Offline JMW IV

  • Posts: 11292
  • Name on the Front > Name on The Back
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #831: May 11, 2010, 10:56:07 PM »
I was kidding anyway, just stunned that JMad, who was equally entrenched, flipped to the other side of the argument.

Again, ideally, Lannan pitches 200 innings this season. I don't WANT him to fail, I'm just annoyed because the bullpen is exhausted.

Pitch Limit does not = "let him Prove he's healthy". It means "he is hurt but we don't want to DL him and we are hoping it is not serious"

which means that it IS serious, and they may as well DL him.

however, I did not agree with just flat out demoting him because he had 4 bad starts.  if you think he is hurt, then DL him though, don't wussyfoot around.

putting him on a pitch count is just extra measures that we don't have time for. either he is hurt, or he isn't. if he isn't, then let him go as far as he can and prove it. if he is, then stop bullcrapting and put him on the DL instead of waiting until he needs TJ surgery to do it.

Offline ernie0326

  • Posts: 2113
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #832: May 11, 2010, 10:56:20 PM »
Sometimes you bite the dog....and sometimes the dog bites you.  Keep ya heads up. We can still win the series tomorrow.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #833: May 11, 2010, 10:56:35 PM »
zimmerman sounded pretty confident about tomorrow that the club will :shrug: it off ... let's hope so.  i would hate to lose this freakin series.

Online PC

  • Posts: 41017
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #834: May 11, 2010, 10:57:58 PM »
Remember how incredibly indignant Bruney was after arbitration?


...and Bergmann and Burnett

The three B's of 2010 arbitration.

http://www.wnff.net/index.php/topic,17496.0.html

Offline UMDNats

  • Posts: 11802
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #835: May 11, 2010, 11:01:12 PM »
Hey guys, it's important to remember that even though times are tough, at least we're not the Pirates.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #836: May 11, 2010, 11:04:33 PM »
...and Bergmann and Burnett

The three B's of 2010 arbitration.

http://www.wnff.net/index.php/topic,17496.0.html


I don't understand why fans automatically side with the player in these cases. Not that I side with the team either, but both have jobs to do. The team offers what it thinks the guy is worth.

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1728
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #837: May 11, 2010, 11:04:48 PM »
Bruney kind of comes across as a jackass in interviews. He might just be upset though

Offline Nathan

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 10679
  • Wow. Such warnings. Very baseball. Moderator Doge.
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #838: May 11, 2010, 11:05:06 PM »
Bruney kind of comes across as a total jackass in interviews
Kind of?

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33835
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #839: May 11, 2010, 11:05:47 PM »
Oh, was it another classic interview?

Offline The Chief

  • Posts: 30122
    • http://www.wnff.net
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #840: May 11, 2010, 11:05:49 PM »
Bruney kind of comes across as a jackass in interviews. He might just be upset though

You aren't privileged to know that ;)

Now I'm wondering if anyone ever interviewed Joey Eischen back in the day.

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #841: May 11, 2010, 11:07:22 PM »
The Cards gave up 6 runs to the Astros in during the 7th and 8th, to blow their lead.

Offline KyleScha

  • Posts: 1728
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #842: May 11, 2010, 11:09:31 PM »
The Cards gave up 6 runs to the Astros in during the 7th and 8th, to blow their lead.

Has Bruney discovered faster than light travel?

Online PC

  • Posts: 41017
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #843: May 11, 2010, 11:10:54 PM »
I can't believe we actually TRADED for Bruney.  >:(

...something was actually given in exchange...

Offline natsfan4evr

  • Posts: 6171
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #844: May 11, 2010, 11:11:50 PM »
Has Bruney discovered faster than light travel?
Out of the 6 runs, only 2 were earned

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #845: May 11, 2010, 11:12:25 PM »
I can't believe we actually TRADED for Bruney.  >:(

...something was actually given in exchange...

Actually, the Yankees paid about $10k to get rid of him when it all shook out.

Offline Lintyfresh85

  • Posts: 33835
  • Next year, maybe?
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #846: May 11, 2010, 11:44:06 PM »
Losing sucks.

I don't think I'll ever get to sleep tonight.

I'd much rather lose a game 8-0 than to blow a game like what we saw tonight.

Offline PANatsFan

  • Posts: 37061
  • dogs in uncensored, nudes in gameday
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #847: May 11, 2010, 11:44:07 PM »
Whatever's happening in this thread is annoying.

Lannan's pitch count is 100. Objection halfway withdrawn.

Offline hammondsnats

  • Posts: 37348
  • LAC 8)
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #848: May 12, 2010, 12:09:29 AM »
lol wtf

Offline ColtonWillems

  • Posts: 1125
  • "You have no integrity"
Re: Nationals @ Mets, Game 2
« Reply #849: May 12, 2010, 12:19:33 AM »
Couple of questions for you guys, first I want to say that wow, I definitely picked the wrong game to go to.

Second, why did Olsen come out? He only threw 83 pitches and he was throwing some good balls.
Third, Tyler Walker, Brian Bruney, and Miguel Batista are pretty pathetic excuses for pitchers.
Fourth, I hate the mets.

Big rubber game tomorrow.